An In Situ, Child-Led Intervention to Promote Emotion Regulation Competence in Middle Childhood: Protocol for an Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.
children
efficacy
emotion
emotion regulation
exploratory
in situ intervention
intervention
model
prevention
protocol
randomized controlled trial
risk factor
treatment
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Nov 2021
09 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
06
04
2021
accepted:
25
05
2021
revised:
24
05
2021
entrez:
9
11
2021
pubmed:
10
11
2021
medline:
10
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emotion regulation is a key transdiagnostic risk factor for a range of psychopathologies, making it a prime target for both prevention and treatment interventions in childhood. Existing interventions predominantly rely on workshops or in-person therapy-based approaches, limiting the ability to promote emotion regulation competence for children in everyday settings and at scale. Purrble is a newly developed, inexpensive, socially assistive robot-in the form of an interactive plush toy-that uses haptic feedback to support in-the-moment emotion regulation. It is accessible to children as needed in their daily lives, without the need for a priori training. Although qualitative data from previous studies show high engagement in situ and anecdotal evidence of the robot being incorporated into children's emotion regulation routines, there is no quantitative evidence of the intervention's impact on child outcomes. The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of a new intervention model for child-led emotion regulation-Purrble-that can be deployed across prevention and treatment contexts. Overall, 134 children aged 8 to 10 years will be selected from an enriched nonclinical North American population; for inclusion, the cutoff for the parents' rating of child dysregulation will be ≥10 points in the total difficulties score on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. This cutoff was selected to obtain a measurable, but not necessarily clinical, level of the child's emotion regulatory difficulties. The selected families will be randomly assigned with .5 probability to receive either a Purrble or an active control (noninteractive plush toy). The primary outcome will be a daily ecological momentary assessment measure of child emotion regulation capability (as reported by parents) over a period of 4 weeks. Exploratory analyses will investigate the intervention impact on secondary outcomes of child emotion regulation, collected weekly over the same 4-week period, with follow-ups at 1 month and 6 months postdeployment. Quantitative data will be analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. A proportion of families (approximately 30% of the sample) will be interviewed after deployment as part of the process analysis. The study is funded by the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/T041897/1) and an in-kind contribution from the Committee for Children. This study received ethical approval from the Pearl institutional review board (#18-CFC-101). Participant recruitment started in February 2021, with the 1-month deployment in April-May 2021. The results of this analysis will be published in 2022. This study will be the first quantitative evaluation of the efficacy of an innovative, proof-of-concept intervention model for an in situ, child-led emotion regulation intervention. Insights into the trajectory of daily changes, complemented with weekly questionnaire batteries and postdeployment interviews, will result in an in-depth understanding of whether and how the hypothesized intervention logic model works, leading to further intervention optimization. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04810455; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04810455. PRR1-10.2196/28914.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Emotion regulation is a key transdiagnostic risk factor for a range of psychopathologies, making it a prime target for both prevention and treatment interventions in childhood. Existing interventions predominantly rely on workshops or in-person therapy-based approaches, limiting the ability to promote emotion regulation competence for children in everyday settings and at scale. Purrble is a newly developed, inexpensive, socially assistive robot-in the form of an interactive plush toy-that uses haptic feedback to support in-the-moment emotion regulation. It is accessible to children as needed in their daily lives, without the need for a priori training. Although qualitative data from previous studies show high engagement in situ and anecdotal evidence of the robot being incorporated into children's emotion regulation routines, there is no quantitative evidence of the intervention's impact on child outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of a new intervention model for child-led emotion regulation-Purrble-that can be deployed across prevention and treatment contexts.
METHODS
METHODS
Overall, 134 children aged 8 to 10 years will be selected from an enriched nonclinical North American population; for inclusion, the cutoff for the parents' rating of child dysregulation will be ≥10 points in the total difficulties score on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. This cutoff was selected to obtain a measurable, but not necessarily clinical, level of the child's emotion regulatory difficulties. The selected families will be randomly assigned with .5 probability to receive either a Purrble or an active control (noninteractive plush toy). The primary outcome will be a daily ecological momentary assessment measure of child emotion regulation capability (as reported by parents) over a period of 4 weeks. Exploratory analyses will investigate the intervention impact on secondary outcomes of child emotion regulation, collected weekly over the same 4-week period, with follow-ups at 1 month and 6 months postdeployment. Quantitative data will be analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. A proportion of families (approximately 30% of the sample) will be interviewed after deployment as part of the process analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study is funded by the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/T041897/1) and an in-kind contribution from the Committee for Children. This study received ethical approval from the Pearl institutional review board (#18-CFC-101). Participant recruitment started in February 2021, with the 1-month deployment in April-May 2021. The results of this analysis will be published in 2022.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study will be the first quantitative evaluation of the efficacy of an innovative, proof-of-concept intervention model for an in situ, child-led emotion regulation intervention. Insights into the trajectory of daily changes, complemented with weekly questionnaire batteries and postdeployment interviews, will result in an in-depth understanding of whether and how the hypothesized intervention logic model works, leading to further intervention optimization.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04810455; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04810455.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
PRR1-10.2196/28914.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34751666
pii: v10i11e28914
doi: 10.2196/28914
pmc: PMC8663453
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04810455']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e28914Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T041897/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
©Petr Slovak, Brett Q Ford, Sherri Widen, Claudia Daudén Roquet, Nikki Theofanopoulou, James J Gross, Benjamin Hankin, Predrag Klasnja. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.11.2021.
Références
Dev Psychol. 2002 Mar;38(2):222-35
pubmed: 11881758
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;20(1):47-63
pubmed: 26564248
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Oct;110(2):171-97
pubmed: 21514596
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e17757
pubmed: 33021487
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):359-65
pubmed: 23527510
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):731-44
pubmed: 17469955
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):163-81
pubmed: 23163767
Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):906-16
pubmed: 9383613
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Aug 05;6(8):e14029
pubmed: 31381502
Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31
pubmed: 4139420
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Aug;147(8):1170-1190
pubmed: 29620380
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar;30(2):217-37
pubmed: 20015584
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;177:534-9
pubmed: 11102329
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Apr;72(4):946-57
pubmed: 26689434
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2002 Dec;30(6):657-67
pubmed: 12481978
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Mar;34(2):157-172
pubmed: 33156724
J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Apr;39(3):369-79
pubmed: 24163438
Dev Psychopathol. 2003 Winter;15(1):139-62
pubmed: 12848439
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 09;3:234
pubmed: 22866043
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Feb;65(1):93-109
pubmed: 9103739
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354
Am Psychol. 2006 Apr;61(3):192-203
pubmed: 16594836
Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1032-9
pubmed: 17201784
Child Dev. 1991 Dec;62(6):1352-66
pubmed: 1786720
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:81-8
pubmed: 27086086
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1337-45
pubmed: 11699809
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Feb;35:35-46
pubmed: 25462112
Psychophysiology. 2002 May;39(3):281-91
pubmed: 12212647
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 May;43(5):729-739
pubmed: 28903637
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016 Aug;47(4):603-17
pubmed: 26443503
Prev Sci. 2001 Sep;2(3):165-92
pubmed: 11678292
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;57:141-163
pubmed: 28941927
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;13(5):634-650
pubmed: 29958060
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;72:101751
pubmed: 31271848
Cogn Behav Pract. 2010 Feb;17(1):88-101
pubmed: 33762811
Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2227-47
pubmed: 9022240
Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;143(9):939-991
pubmed: 28616996
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Jul;38(5):707-20
pubmed: 20180009
J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1301-33
pubmed: 15509284
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):365-76
pubmed: 12585810
Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1195-210
pubmed: 23914957
Cogn Emot. 2018 Jun;32(4):773-795
pubmed: 28737108