Extensive analysis of mitochondrial DNA quantity and sequence variation in human cumulus cells and assisted reproduction outcomes.
BMI
assisted reproduction
cumulus cells
mitochondria
mitochondrial genome sequencing
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1460-2350
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 12 2021
27 12 2021
Historique:
received:
15
04
2021
revised:
16
09
2021
pubmed:
11
11
2021
medline:
3
3
2022
entrez:
10
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Are relative mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content and mitochondrial genome (mtGenome) variants in human cumulus cells (CCs) associated with oocyte reproductive potential and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes? Neither the CC mtDNA quantity nor the presence of specific mtDNA genetic variants was associated with ART outcomes, although associations with patient body mass index (BMI) were detected, and the total number of oocytes retrieved differed between major mitochondrial haplogroups. CCs fulfil a vital role in the support of oocyte developmental competence. As with other cell types, appropriate cellular function is likely to rely upon adequate energy production, which in turn depends on the quantity and genetic competence of the mitochondria. mtDNA mutations can be inherited or they can accumulate in somatic cells over time, potentially contributing to aging. Such mutations may be homoplasmic (affecting all mtDNA in a cell) or they may display varying levels of heteroplasmy (affecting a proportion of the mtDNA). Currently, little is known concerning variation in CC mitochondrial genetics and how this might influence the reproductive potential of the associated oocyte. This was a prospective observational study involving human CCs collected with 541 oocytes from 177 IVF patients. mtDNA quantity was measured in all the samples with a validated quantitative PCR method and the entire mtGenome was sequenced in a subset of 138 samples using a high-depth massively parallel sequencing approach. Associations between relative mtDNA quantity and mtGenome variants in CCs and patient age, BMI (kg/m2), infertility diagnosis and ART outcomes were investigated. Massively parallel sequencing permitted not only the accurate detection of mutations but also the precise quantification of levels of mutations in cases of heteroplasmy. Sequence variants in the mtDNA were evaluated using Mitomaster and HmtVar to predict their potential impact. The relative mtDNA CC content was significantly associated with BMI. No significant associations were observed between CC mtDNA quantity and patient age, female infertility diagnosis or any ART outcome variable. mtGenome sequencing revealed 4181 genetic variants with respect to a reference genome. The COXI locus contained the least number of coding sequence variants, whereas ATPase8 had the most. The number of variants predicted to affect the ATP production differed significantly between mitochondrial macrohaplogroups. The total number of retrieved oocytes was different between the H-V and J-T as well as the U-K and J-T macrohaplogroups. There was a non-significant increase in mtDNA levels in CCs with heteroplasmic mitochondrial mutations. N/A. Although a large number of samples were analysed in this study, it was not possible to analyse all the CCs from every patient. Also, the results obtained with respect to specific clinical outcomes and macrohaplogroups should be interpreted with caution due to the smaller sample sizes when subdividing the dataset. These findings suggest that the analysis of mtDNA in CCs is unlikely to provide an advantage in terms of improved embryo selection during assisted reproduction cycles. Nonetheless, our data raise interesting biological questions, particularly regarding the interplay of metabolism and BMI and the association of mtDNA haplogroup with oocyte yield in ovarian stimulation cycles. This study was funded by National Institutes of Health grant 5R01HD092550-02. D.J.N. and C.R. co-hold patent US20150346100A1 and D.J.N. holds US20170039415A1, both for metabolic imaging methods. D.W. receives support from the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34755183
pii: 6424608
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab231
pmc: PMC8730313
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Mitochondrial
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
66-79Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD092550
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Hum Reprod. 2020 May 1;35(5):1120-1129
pubmed: 32358599
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2018 Dec;29(8):1240-1244
pubmed: 29429383
DNA Cell Biol. 2020 Aug;39(8):1370-1378
pubmed: 31603716
Hum Genet. 2017 Jul;136(7):805-819
pubmed: 28393271
Clin Genet. 2015 Nov;88(5):416-24
pubmed: 25523230
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40449
pubmed: 22848380
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0206003
pubmed: 30403687
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 May;94(5):1533-40
pubmed: 19223519
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2019 Jul;226(3):e13267
pubmed: 30803138
Mitochondrion. 2020 May;52:24-39
pubmed: 32081727
BMC Genet. 2016 May 18;17(1):67
pubmed: 27188709
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 May;34(5):573-580
pubmed: 28190213
Nat Cell Biol. 2018 Jul;20(7):745-754
pubmed: 29950572
Cell Biosci. 2019 Mar 19;9:27
pubmed: 30931098
Reprod Biomed Online. 2000;1(3):96-100
pubmed: 12804188
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014 Jan 02;2:1
pubmed: 24383468
Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):2150-2151
pubmed: 28938742
Reprod Sci. 2021 Sep;28(9):2495-2502
pubmed: 33689162
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):607-614
pubmed: 28077604
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 3;11(1):102
pubmed: 31900386
BMC Biol. 2014 May 27;12:34
pubmed: 24884669
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Dec;13(12):878-90
pubmed: 23154810
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2020 Jan;31(1):11-16
pubmed: 31797714
PLoS Genet. 2015 Jun 03;11(6):e1005241
pubmed: 26039092
Panminerva Med. 2019 Mar;61(1):82-96
pubmed: 29962188
Kidney Int. 2019 Aug;96(2):480-488
pubmed: 31248648
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 May;42(5):901-908
pubmed: 33771465
Fertil Steril. 2015 Sep;104(3):534-41.e1
pubmed: 26051102
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):954-962
pubmed: 28333210
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Mar;33(3):367-371
pubmed: 26749386
Semin Reprod Med. 2015 Nov;33(6):401-9
pubmed: 26565384
Mitochondrion. 2014 Sep;18:1-6
pubmed: 25132080
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):1282-1292
pubmed: 28387858
Reproduction. 2019 Jun;157(6):R235-R242
pubmed: 30844752
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 May;101(5):2235-45
pubmed: 27003307
Hum Mutat. 2009 Feb;30(2):E386-94
pubmed: 18853457
Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 1;32(12):2465-2473
pubmed: 29045673
Mol Hum Reprod. 2010 Oct;16(10):715-25
pubmed: 20435609
Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):2149-2150
pubmed: 28938741
Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):2101-2109
pubmed: 28938736
Mitochondrion. 2020 May;52:157-162
pubmed: 32173566
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013 Mar;14(3):141-52
pubmed: 23429793
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Nov;36(11):2315-2324
pubmed: 31512049
Schizophr Res. 2017 Sep;187:67-73
pubmed: 28693754
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W58-63
pubmed: 27084951
Fertil Steril. 2017 Nov;108(5):742-747
pubmed: 29101999
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014 Feb;30(2):90-4
pubmed: 24188449
J Int Med Res. 2012;40(2):734-9
pubmed: 22613437
Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1100-1107
pubmed: 28333293
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;27(3):175-81
pubmed: 25719756
BBA Clin. 2017 Apr 05;7:141-146
pubmed: 28660134
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 15;18(7):e3000745
pubmed: 32667908
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 May;6(5):389-402
pubmed: 15861210
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Feb;38:216.e7-216.e10
pubmed: 26639155
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D1202-D1210
pubmed: 30371888
Biol Reprod. 2020 Mar 13;102(3):607-619
pubmed: 31621839
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Feb;36(2):223-228
pubmed: 30362054
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2015 Jul;38(4):629-40
pubmed: 25778941
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jul;30(7):1653-64
pubmed: 25994667
Fertil Steril. 2004 Sep;82(3):593-600
pubmed: 15374701
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):12-17
pubmed: 23273984
Nat Genet. 1999 Oct;23(2):147
pubmed: 10508508
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Dec 20;2018(4):hoy023
pubmed: 30895263
J Intern Med. 2020 Jun;287(6):634-644
pubmed: 32187761
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:964614
pubmed: 25276836
Hum Reprod. 1995 Feb;10(2):415-24
pubmed: 7769073
J Cell Physiol. 2014 Mar;229(3):353-61
pubmed: 24002908
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Feb;1797(2):113-28
pubmed: 19761752
Reprod Sci. 2016 Apr;23(4):498-507
pubmed: 26468254
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Aug;41(2):183-190
pubmed: 32600944
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):34-42.e3
pubmed: 27793366