Compatibility of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training for Skeletal Muscle Size and Function: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Journal
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1179-2035
Titre abrégé: Sports Med
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 8412297
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
accepted:
16
10
2021
pubmed:
11
11
2021
medline:
22
3
2022
entrez:
10
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Both athletes and recreational exercisers often perform relatively high volumes of aerobic and strength training simultaneously. However, the compatibility of these two distinct training modes remains unclear. This systematic review assessed the compatibility of concurrent aerobic and strength training compared with strength training alone, in terms of adaptations in muscle function (maximal and explosive strength) and muscle mass. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the influence of training modality, training type, exercise order, training frequency, age, and training status. A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus were systematically searched (12 August 2020, updated on 15 March 2021). Eligibility criteria were as follows. healthy adults of any sex and age; Intervention: supervised concurrent aerobic and strength training for at least 4 weeks; Comparison: identical strength training prescription, with no aerobic training; Outcome: maximal strength, explosive strength, and muscle hypertrophy. A total of 43 studies were included. The estimated standardised mean differences (SMD) based on the random-effects model were - 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.20 to 0.09; p = 0.446), - 0.28 (95% CI - 0.48 to - 0.08; p = 0.007), and - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.16 to 0.18; p = 0.919) for maximal strength, explosive strength, and muscle hypertrophy, respectively. Attenuation of explosive strength was more pronounced when concurrent training was performed within the same session (p = 0.043) than when sessions were separated by at least 3 h (p > 0.05). No significant effects were found for the other moderators, i.e. type of aerobic training (cycling vs. running), frequency of concurrent training (> 5 vs. < 5 weekly sessions), training status (untrained vs. active), and mean age (< 40 vs. > 40 years). Concurrent aerobic and strength training does not compromise muscle hypertrophy and maximal strength development. However, explosive strength gains may be attenuated, especially when aerobic and strength training are performed in the same session. These results appeared to be independent of the type of aerobic training, frequency of concurrent training, training status, and age. CRD42020203777.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Both athletes and recreational exercisers often perform relatively high volumes of aerobic and strength training simultaneously. However, the compatibility of these two distinct training modes remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review assessed the compatibility of concurrent aerobic and strength training compared with strength training alone, in terms of adaptations in muscle function (maximal and explosive strength) and muscle mass. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the influence of training modality, training type, exercise order, training frequency, age, and training status.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus were systematically searched (12 August 2020, updated on 15 March 2021). Eligibility criteria were as follows.
POPULATION
METHODS
healthy adults of any sex and age; Intervention: supervised concurrent aerobic and strength training for at least 4 weeks; Comparison: identical strength training prescription, with no aerobic training; Outcome: maximal strength, explosive strength, and muscle hypertrophy.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 43 studies were included. The estimated standardised mean differences (SMD) based on the random-effects model were - 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.20 to 0.09; p = 0.446), - 0.28 (95% CI - 0.48 to - 0.08; p = 0.007), and - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.16 to 0.18; p = 0.919) for maximal strength, explosive strength, and muscle hypertrophy, respectively. Attenuation of explosive strength was more pronounced when concurrent training was performed within the same session (p = 0.043) than when sessions were separated by at least 3 h (p > 0.05). No significant effects were found for the other moderators, i.e. type of aerobic training (cycling vs. running), frequency of concurrent training (> 5 vs. < 5 weekly sessions), training status (untrained vs. active), and mean age (< 40 vs. > 40 years).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Concurrent aerobic and strength training does not compromise muscle hypertrophy and maximal strength development. However, explosive strength gains may be attenuated, especially when aerobic and strength training are performed in the same session. These results appeared to be independent of the type of aerobic training, frequency of concurrent training, training status, and age.
PROSPERO
UNASSIGNED
CRD42020203777.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34757594
doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01587-7
pii: 10.1007/s40279-021-01587-7
pmc: PMC8891239
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
601-612Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Li R, Xia J, Zhang XI, et al. Associations of muscle mass and strength with all-cause mortality among US older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(3):458–67.
pubmed: 28991040
pmcid: 5820209
Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301(19):2024–35.
pubmed: 19454641
Hawley JA. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to prolonged, intense endurance training. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002;29(3):218–22.
pubmed: 11906487
Tesch PA. Skeletal muscle adaptations consequent to long-term heavy resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20(5 Suppl):S132–4.
pubmed: 3057312
Daly RM, Dalla Via J, Fyfe JJ, et al. Effects of exercise frequency and training volume on bone changes following a multi-component exercise intervention in middle aged and older men: Secondary analysis of an 18-month randomized controlled trial. Bone. 2021;148:115944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2021.115944 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115944
pubmed: 33836310
Severinsen MCK, Pedersen BK. Muscle-organ crosstalk: the emerging roles of myokines. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(4):594–609.
pmcid: 7288608
Casas-Herrero A, Cadore EL, Zambom-Ferraresi F, et al. Functional capacity, muscle fat infiltration, power output, and cognitive impairment in institutionalized frail oldest old. Rejuvenation Res. 2013;16(5):396–403.
pubmed: 23822577
pmcid: 3804230
Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK, et al. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1:CD012424. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2 .
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2
pubmed: 30703272
Hickson RC. Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980;45(2–3):255–63.
pubmed: 7193134
Häkkinen K, Alen M, Kraemer WJ, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89(1):42–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-002-0751-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0751-9
pubmed: 12627304
McCarthy JP, Agre JC, Graf BK, et al. Compatibility of adaptive responses with combining strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27(3):429–36.
pubmed: 7752872
McCarthy JP, Pozniak MA, Agre JC. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(3):511–9.
pubmed: 11880817
Chtara M, Chaouachi A, Levin GT, et al. Effect of concurrent endurance and circuit resistance training sequence on muscular strength and power development. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(4):1037–45.
pubmed: 18545210
Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, et al. Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2293–307.
pubmed: 22002517
Petré H, Hemmingsson E, Rosdahl H, et al. Development of maximal dynamic strength during concurrent resistance and endurance training in untrained, moderately trained, and trained individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01426-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01426-9
pubmed: 33751469
pmcid: 8053170
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
pubmed: 2707010
pmcid: 2707010
Drevon D, Fursa SR, Malcolm AL. Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data. Behav Modif. 2017;41(2):323–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516673998 .
doi: 10.1177/0145445516673998
pubmed: 27760807
pmcid: 27760807
Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3):1–48. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/1059637?limo=0 .
Morris SB. Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ Res Methods. 2008;11(2):364–86.
Becker BJ. Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1988;41(2):257–78.
Viechtbauer W. Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. J Educ Behav Stat. 2005;30(3):261–93.
Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10(1):101.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.
pubmed: 12111919
pmcid: 12111919
Viechtbauer W, Cheung MW-L. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):112–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.11 .
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.11
pubmed: 26061377
Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088.
Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester: Wiley; 2005.
Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0.: Cochrane Collab. 2011.
Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, et al. Rating the quality of trials in systematic reviews of physical therapy interventions. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2010;21(3):20–6.
pubmed: 20957075
pmcid: 2941354
Gravelle BL, Blessing DL. Physiological adaptation in women concurrently training for strength and endurance. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14(1):5–13.
Jones TW, Howatson G, Russell M, et al. Performance and neuromuscular adaptations following differing ratios of concurrent strength and endurance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(12):3342–51.
pubmed: 24270456
Mikkola J, Rusko H, Izquierdo M, et al. Neuromuscular and cardiovascular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training in untrained men. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(9):702–10. http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L366368740 .
Gettman LR, Ward P, Hagan RD. A comparison of combined running and weight training with circuit weight training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(3):229–34.
pubmed: 7109892
Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Jacobs I, et al. Interaction between concurrent strength and endurance training. J Appl Physiol. 1990;68(1):260–70. http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L20075241 .
Hennessy LC, Watson AWS. The interference effects of training for strength and endurance simultaneously. J Strength Cond Res. 1994;8(1):12.
Kraemer WJ, Patton JF, Gordon SE, et al. Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995;78(3):976–89. http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L25098185 https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1995.78.3.976 .
Dolezal BA, Potteiger JA. Concurrent resistance and endurance training influence basal metabolic rate in nondieting individuals. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998;85(2):695–700.
Bell GJ, Syrotuik D, Martin TP, et al. Effect of concurrent strength and endurance training on skeletal muscle properties and hormone concentrations in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81(5):418–27.
pubmed: 10751104
Balabinis CP, Psarakis CH, Moukas M, et al. Early phase changes by concurrent endurance and strength training. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(2):393–401.
pubmed: 12741884
Glowacki SP, Martin SE, Maurer A, et al. Effects of resistance, endurance, and concurrent exercise on training outcomes in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(12):2119–27.
pubmed: 15570149
Haykowsky M, McGavock J, Muhll IV, et al. Effect of exercise training on peak aerobic power, left ventricular morphology, and muscle strength in healthy older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(3):307–11.
pubmed: 15860465
Cadore EL, Pinto RS, Lhullier FLR, et al. Physiological effects of concurrent training in elderly men. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31(10):689–97.
pubmed: 20617484
Hendrickson NR, Sharp MA, Alemany JA, et al. Combined resistance and endurance training improves physical capacity and performance on tactical occupational tasks. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109(6):1197–208.
pubmed: 20383644
Silva RF, Cadore EL, Kothe G, et al. Concurrent training with different aerobic exercises. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(8):627–34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1299698 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299698
pubmed: 22562730
Libardi CA, de Souza GV, Cavaglieri CR, et al. Effect of resistance, endurance, and concurrent training on TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1):50–6.
pubmed: 21697747
Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Gustafsson T, et al. Aerobic exercise does not compromise muscle hypertrophy response to short-term resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013;114(1):81–9.
de Souza EO, Tricoli V, Roschel H, et al. Molecular adaptations to concurrent training. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(3):207–13.
pubmed: 23044732
Cantrell GS, Schilling BK, Paquette MR, et al. Maximal strength, power, and aerobic endurance adaptations to concurrent strength and sprint interval training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(4):763–71.
pubmed: 24390691
Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Norrbom J, et al. Truncated splice variant PGC-1\alpha4 is not associated with exercise-induced human muscle hypertrophy. Acta Physiol. 2014;212(2):142–51.
Fyfe JJ, Bartlett JD, Hanson ED, et al. Endurance training intensity does not mediate interference to maximal lower-body strength gain during short-term concurrent training. Front Physiol. 2016;7:487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00487 .
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00487
pubmed: 27857692
pmcid: 5093324
Kazior Z, Willis SJ, Moberg M, et al. Endurance exercise enhances the effect of strength training on muscle fiber size and protein expression of akt and mTOR. PLoS One 2016;11(2):e0149082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149082 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149082
pubmed: 26885978
pmcid: 4757413
Robineau J, Babault N, Piscione J, et al. Specific training effects of concurrent aerobic and strength exercises depend on recovery duration. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(3):672–83.
pubmed: 25546450
Laird RH, Elmer DJ, Barberio MD, et al. Evaluation of performance improvements after either resistance training or sprint interval-based concurrent training. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(11):3057–65.
pubmed: 26950345
Terzis G, Spengos K, Methenitis S, et al. Early phase interference between low-intensity running and power training in moderately trained females. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(5):1063–73.
pubmed: 27040693
Tsitkanou S, Spengos K, Stasinaki A-N, et al. Effects of high-intensity interval cycling performed after resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(11):1317–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12751 .
doi: 10.1111/sms.12751
pubmed: 27659479
Osuka Y, Fujita S, Kitano N, et al. Effects of aerobic and resistance training combined with fortified milk on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(10):1349–57.
pubmed: 29188900
Robineau J, Lacome M, Piscione J, et al. Concurrent training in rugby sevens: effects of high-intensity interval exercises. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(3):336–44.
pubmed: 27294374
Panissa VLG, Fukuda DH, de Oliveira FP, et al. Maximum strength development and volume-load during concurrent high intensity intermittent training plus strength or strength-only training. J Sports Sci Med. 2018;17(4):623–32.
pubmed: 30479531
pmcid: 6243621
Spiliopoulou P, Zaras N, Methenitis S, et al. Effect of concurrent power training and high-intensity interval cycling on muscle morphology and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;35(9):2464–71. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003172
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003172
Lee MJ-C, Ballantyne JK, Chagolla J, et al. Order of same-day concurrent training influences some indices of power development, but not strength, lean mass, or aerobic fitness in healthy, moderately-active men after 9 weeks of training. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233134.
pubmed: 32407361
pmcid: 7224562
Karavirta L, Häkkinen A, Sillanpää E, et al. Effects of combined endurance and strength training on muscle strength, power and hypertrophy in 40–67-year-old men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(3):402–11.
pubmed: 20030775
Karavirta L. Cardiorespiratory, neuromuscular and cardiac autonomic adaptations to combined endurance and strength training in ageing men and women 162 studies in sports, physical education and health. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-4216-8
Shamim B, Devlin BL, Timmins RG, et al. Adaptations to concurrent training in combination with high protein availability: a comparative trial in healthy, recreationally active men. Sports Med. 2018;48(12):2869–83.
pubmed: 30341593
pmcid: 6244626
Jones TW, Howatson G, Russell M, et al. Performance and endocrine responses to differing ratios of concurrent strength and endurance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(3):693–702.
pubmed: 26907840
Kraemer WJ, Vescovi JD, Volek JS, et al. Effects of concurrent resistance and aerobic training on load-bearing performance and the Army physical fitness test. Mil Med. 2004;169(12):994–9.
pubmed: 15646194
Sillanpää E, Häkkinen A, Nyman K, et al. Body composition and fitness during strength and/or endurance training in older men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(5):950–8.
pubmed: 18408601
Sillanpää E, Häkkinen A, Laaksonen DE, et al. Serum basal hormone concentrations, nutrition and physical fitness during strength and/or endurance training in 3964-year-old women. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31(2):110–7.
pubmed: 20222003
Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Tesch PA. Exercise-induced AMPK activation does not interfere with muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in men. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014;116(6):611–20. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01082.2013 .
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01082.2013
Timmins RG, Shamim B, Tofari PJ, et al. Differences in lower limb strength and structure after 12 weeks of resistance, endurance, and concurrent training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020:1–8. https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L631343334&from=export . https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0788 .
Del Vecchio A, Negro F, Holobar A, et al. You are as fast as your motor neurons: speed of recruitment and maximal discharge of motor neurons determine the maximal rate of force development in humans. J Physiol. 2019;597(9):2445–56. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP277396 .
doi: 10.1113/JP277396
pubmed: 30768687
pmcid: 6487919
Eklund D, Pulverenti T, Bankers S, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations to different modes of combined strength and endurance training. Int J Sports Med. 2015;36(2):120–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1385883 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385883
pubmed: 25259588
Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Alberton CL, et al. Strength prior to endurance intra-session exercise sequence optimizes neuromuscular and cardiovascular gains in elderly men. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47(2):164–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2011.11.013 .
doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2011.11.013
pubmed: 22178632
Rønnestad BR, Hansen EA, Raastad T. Strength training affects tendon cross-sectional area and freely chosen cadence differently in noncyclists and well-trained cyclists. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(1):158–66.
pubmed: 22201692
Cheung MW-L. A guide to conducting a meta-analysis with non-independent effect sizes. Neuropsychol Rev. 2019;29(4):387–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09415-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s11065-019-09415-6
pubmed: 31446547
pmcid: 6892772
Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Stepto NK. Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role of individual training variables. Sports Med. 2014;44(6):743–62.
pubmed: 24728927
Coffey VG, Hawley JA. Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? J Physiol. 2017;595(9). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27506998/ .
Hawley JA. Molecular responses to strength and endurance training: are they incompatible? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34(3):355–61.
pubmed: 19448698
Atherton PJ, Babraj J, Smith K, et al. Selective activation of AMPK-PGC-1alpha or PKB-TSC2-mTOR signaling can explain specific adaptive responses to endurance or resistance training-like electrical muscle stimulation. FASEB J. 2005;19(7):786–8. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-2179fje .
doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2179fje
pubmed: 15716393
Thomson DM, Fick CA, Gordon SE. AMPK activation attenuates S6K1, 4E-BP1, and eEF2 signaling responses to high-frequency electrically stimulated skeletal muscle contractions. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008;104(3):625–32. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00915.2007 .
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00915.2007
Apró W, Moberg M, Hamilton DL, et al. Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;308(6):E470–81. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2014 .
doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2014
pubmed: 25605643
Carrithers JA, Carroll CC, Coker RH, et al. Concurrent exercise and muscle protein synthesis: implications for exercise countermeasures in space. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78(5):457–62.
pubmed: 17539438
Sabag A, Najafi A, Michael S, et al. The compatibility of concurrent high intensity interval training and resistance training for muscular strength and hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(21):2472–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1464636 .
doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1464636
pubmed: 29658408
Vechin FC, Conceição MS, Telles GD, et al. Interference phenomenon with concurrent strength and high-intensity interval training-based aerobic training: an updated model. Sports Med. 2021;51(4):599–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01421-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01421-6
pubmed: 33405189
Schroeder EC, Franke WD, Sharp RL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of aerobic, resistance, and combined training on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210292 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210292
pubmed: 30615666
pmcid: 6322789
Timmons JF, Minnock D, Hone M, et al. Comparison of time-matched aerobic, resistance, or concurrent exercise training in older adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(11). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29947107/ .