External Quality Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Sequencing: an ESGMD-SSM Pilot Trial across 15 European Laboratories.
NGS
external quality assessment
ring trial
whole-genome sequencing
Journal
Journal of clinical microbiology
ISSN: 1098-660X
Titre abrégé: J Clin Microbiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 01 2022
19 01 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
11
11
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
10
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This first pilot trial on external quality assessment (EQA) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) whole-genome sequencing, initiated by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Genomic and Molecular Diagnostics (ESGMD) and the Swiss Society for Microbiology (SSM), aims to build a framework between laboratories in order to improve pathogen surveillance sequencing. Ten samples with various viral loads were sent out to 15 clinical laboratories that had free choice of sequencing methods and bioinformatic analyses. The key aspects on which the individual centers were compared were the identification of (i) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indels, (ii) Pango lineages, and (iii) clusters between samples. The participating laboratories used a wide array of methods and analysis pipelines. Most were able to generate whole genomes for all samples. Genomes were sequenced to various depths (up to a 100-fold difference across centers). There was a very good consensus regarding the majority of reporting criteria, but there were a few discrepancies in lineage and cluster assignments. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in variant calling. The main reasons for discrepancies were missing data, bioinformatic choices, and interpretation of data. The pilot EQA was overall a success. It was able to show the high quality of participating laboratories and provide valuable feedback in cases where problems occurred, thereby improving the sequencing setup of laboratories. A larger follow-up EQA should, however, improve on defining the variables and format of the report. Additionally, contamination and/or minority variants should be a further aspect of assessment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34757834
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01698-21
pmc: PMC8769736
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0169821Références
PLoS Pathog. 2021 Mar 19;17(3):e1009374
pubmed: 33740028
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
Genes (Basel). 2019 Aug 28;10(9):
pubmed: 31466373
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;42(10):1173-1180
pubmed: 33308357
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1405-1410
pubmed: 32678356
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jul 2;48(W1):W395-W402
pubmed: 32479607
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0180321
pubmed: 34878296
Microorganisms. 2021 May 19;9(5):
pubmed: 34069681
Front Microbiol. 2020 Sep 25;11:571328
pubmed: 33101244
J Clin Virol. 2021 Nov;144:104993
pubmed: 34619382
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Nov;5(11):1403-1407
pubmed: 32669681
Genes (Basel). 2020 Aug 17;11(8):
pubmed: 32824573
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7869):707-712
pubmed: 34098568
J Med Virol. 2021 Apr;93(4):2374-2384
pubmed: 33314153
Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 24;11:591093
pubmed: 33424794
Nat Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;39(10):1178-1179
pubmed: 34588690
Genome Biol. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):8
pubmed: 30621750