Information about foot care provided to people with diabetes with or without their partners: Impact on recommended foot care behavior.
diabetes
dyad
education
foot care
Journal
Applied psychology. Health and well-being
ISSN: 1758-0854
Titre abrégé: Appl Psychol Health Well Being
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101502957
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
revised:
28
09
2021
received:
15
07
2021
accepted:
30
09
2021
pubmed:
12
11
2021
medline:
7
5
2022
entrez:
11
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many people with diabetes will develop foot ulcers. To reduce risk, it is recommended that the feet are protected against harm and checked daily. Spouses can help people with diabetes care for their feet. A randomized parallel arm design compared information sheets given to participants with diabetes and their spouses (dyad group; n = 64) to an information sheet given only to participants with diabetes (individual group; n = 69). The self-reported number of days that the participant with diabetes' feet were (1) checked for problems and (2) protected against problems occurring (by the person with diabetes and/or the spouse) were summed for the week after receiving the information sheet. ANCOVAs tested the effects of group. Frequency of foot detection behavior (Participant + Spouse) was significantly higher in the dyad group compared with the individual group. This was not the case for foot protection behavior (Participant + Spouse). Findings revealed greater levels of spousal support (for both protection and detection behavior) in the dyad group compared to the individual group. Clinical recommendations and advice on foot care delivered both to people with diabetes and their spouses can encourage greater foot care than if delivered to the patient alone.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Many people with diabetes will develop foot ulcers. To reduce risk, it is recommended that the feet are protected against harm and checked daily. Spouses can help people with diabetes care for their feet.
METHODS
A randomized parallel arm design compared information sheets given to participants with diabetes and their spouses (dyad group; n = 64) to an information sheet given only to participants with diabetes (individual group; n = 69). The self-reported number of days that the participant with diabetes' feet were (1) checked for problems and (2) protected against problems occurring (by the person with diabetes and/or the spouse) were summed for the week after receiving the information sheet. ANCOVAs tested the effects of group.
RESULTS
Frequency of foot detection behavior (Participant + Spouse) was significantly higher in the dyad group compared with the individual group. This was not the case for foot protection behavior (Participant + Spouse). Findings revealed greater levels of spousal support (for both protection and detection behavior) in the dyad group compared to the individual group.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical recommendations and advice on foot care delivered both to people with diabetes and their spouses can encourage greater foot care than if delivered to the patient alone.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
465-482Informations de copyright
© 2021 The International Association of Applied Psychology.
Références
Ahola, A. J., & Groop, H. (2013). Barriers to self-management of diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 30(4), 413-420.
Apelqvist, J., Ragnarson-Tennvall, G., Persson, U., & Larsson, J. (1994). Diabetic foot ulcers in a multidisciplinary setting: An economic analysis of primary healing and healing with amputation. Journal of Internal Medicine, 235, 463-471.
Arden-Close, E., & McGrath, N. (2017). Health behaviour change interventions for couples: A systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 22, 215-237.
Ayele, K., Tsefe, B., Adebe, L., Tilahun, T., & Girma, E. (2012). Self care behavior among patients with diabetes in Harari, Eastern Ethiopia: The health belief model perspective. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35515.
Badr, H., Carmack, C. L., Kashy, D. A., Cristofanilli, M., & Revenson, T. A. (2010). Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychology, 29(2), 169-180.
Baig, A. A., Benitez, A., Quinn, M. T., & Burnet, D. L. (2015). Family interventions to improve diabetes outcomes for adults. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1353, 89-112.
Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 920-954.
Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., Butner, J., Bloor, L., Bradstreet, C., Upchurch, R., Hayes, J., Stephenson, R., Nail, L., & Patton, G. (2008). Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 505-516.
Beverly, E., Wray, L., & Miller, C. K. (2008). Practice implications of what couples tell us about Type 2 diabetes management. Diabetes Spectrum, 21(1), 39-45.
Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping-A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137-140.
Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being. A Comparison. European Psychologist, 16(4), 255-266.
Bullen, B., Young, M., McArdle, C., & Ellis, M. (2019). Overcoming barriers to self-management: The person-centred diabetes foot behavioural agreement. The Foot, 38, 65-69.
Bus, S. A., van Netten, J. J., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro-Soares, M., Rasmussen, A., Jubiz, Y., Price, P. E., & International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. (2016). IWGDF guidance on the prevention of foot ulcers in at-risk patients with diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research & Reviews, 32(Suppl. 1), 16-24.
Calder K. Boosting attendance of diabetes self-management education. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/professionals/news--updates/boosting-attendance-of-diabetes-self-management-education; 2017.
Carfora, V., & Catellani, P. (2021). The effect of persuasive messages in promoting home-based physical activity during COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644050
Chao, H., Lao, I., Hao, L., & Lin, C. (2012). Association of body image and health beliefs with health behaviors in patients with diabetes: A cross-sectional study. The Diabetes Educator, 38(5), 705-714.
Chung, M. L., Moser, D. K., Lennie, T. A., & Rayens, M. K. (2009). The effects of depressive symptoms and anxiety on quality of life in patients with heart failure and their spouses: Testing dyadic dynamics using actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 67, 29-35.
Coffey, L., Mahon, C., & Gallagher, P. (2019). Perceptions and experiences of diabetic foot ulceration and foot care in people with diabetes: A qualitative meta-synthesis. International Wound Journal, 16(1), 183-210.
Diabetes UK. More than 400,000 people with diabetes not getting their annual foot check. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about_us/news/too-many-people-not-getting-foot-checks; 2015.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
Gale, L., Vedhara, K., Searle, A., Kemple, T., & Campbell, R. (2008). Patients' perspectives on foot complications in type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice, 58, 555-563.
Gillick, M. R. (2013). The critical role of caregivers in achieving patient-centered care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(6), 575-576.
Greenwell, K., Sivyer, K., Vedhara, K., Yardley, L., Game, F., Chalder, T., Richards, G., Drake, N., Gray, K., Weinman, J., & Bradbury, K. (2018). Intervention planning for the REDUCE maintenance intervention: A digital intervention to reduce reulceration risk among patients with a history of diabetic foot ulcers. British Medical Journal Open, 8(5), e019865.
Guell, C., & Unwin, N. (2015). Barriers to diabetic foot care in a developing country with a high incidence of diabetes related amputations: An exploratory qualitative interview study. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 377.
Hermanns, N., Ehrmann, D., Finke-Groene, K., & Kulzer, B. (2020). Trends in diabetes self-management education: Where are we coming from and where are we going? A narrative review. Diabetic Medicine, 37(3), 436-447.
Hinyard, L., & Kreuter, M. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34(5), 777-792.
Housten-Barrett, R. A., & Wilson, C. M. (2014). Couple's relationship with diabetes: Means and meanings for management success. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 40(1), 92-105.
International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Atlas 9th edition. https://diabetesatlas.org/en/resources/; 2019
Keogh, K. M., Smith, S. M., White, P., McGilloway, S., Kelly, A., Gibney, J., & O'Dowd, T. (2011). Psychological family intervention for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. The American Journal of Managed Care, 17(2), 105-113.
Kim, M., & Lee, E. (2019). Factors affecting self-care behavior levels among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: A quantile regression approach. Medicina, 55(7).
Koops van't Jagt, R., Tan, S., Hoeks, J., Spoorenberg, S., Reijneveld, S. A., de Winter, A., Lippke, S., & Jansen, C. (2019). Using photo stories to support doctor-patient communication: Evaluating a communicative health literacy intervention for older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19).
Kovacs Burns, K., Nicolucci, A., Holt, R. I. G., Willaing, I., Hermanns, N., Kalra, S., Wens, J., Pouwer, F., Skovlund, S. E., Peyrot, M., & DAWN2 Study Group. (2013). Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2): Cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 30(7), 778-788.
Kurtz, M. E., Kurtz, J. C., Given, C. W., & Given, B. (2005). A randomized, controlled trial of a patient/caregiver symptom control intervention: Effects on depressive symptomatology of caregivers of cancer patients. Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, 30(2), 112-122.
Larsson, J., Agardh, C. D., Apelqvist, J., & Stenstrom, A. (1995). Clinical characteristics in relation to final amputation level in diabetic patients with foot ulcers: A prospective study of healing below or above the ankle in 187 patients. Foot & Ankle International, 16, 69-74.
Lewis, M. A., McBride, C. M., Pollak, K. I., Puleo, E., Butterfield, R. M., & Emmons, K. M. (2006). Understanding health behaviour change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1369-1380.
Lipsky, B. A., Berendt, A. R., Cornia, P. B., Pile, J. C., Peters, E. J. G., Armstrong, D. G., Deery, H. G., Embil, J. M., Joseph, W. S., Karchmer, A. W., Pinzur, M. A., Senneville, E., & Infectious Diseases Society of America. (2012). 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 54(12), e132-e173.
Martire, L. M., Lustig, A. P., Schulz, R., Miller, G. E., & Helgeson, V. S. (2004). Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychology, 23(6), 599-611.
Mendez-Luck, C., Miranda, J., Mangione, C. M., Yoon, J., & VanGarde, A. (2019). The Juntos pilot study: A diabetes management intervention for Latino caregiving dyads. Diabetes Educator, 45(5), 507-519.
Mohamed, S. A., & El-Bahnasawy, M. M. (2012). Effect of family caregiver's involvement in educational program on health status of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 42(3), 741-752.
Moss, S. E., Klein, R., & Klein, B. E. (1996). Long-term incidence of lower-extremity amputations in a diabetic population. Archives of Family Medicine, 5(7), 391-398.
Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26-52.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Diabetic foot problems: prevention and management (NICE Guideline NG19). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng19; 2019
Pareira, M. G., Pedras, S., Ferreira, C., & Machado, J. C. (2019). Family and couple variables regarding adherence in type 2 diabetes patients in the initial stages of the disease. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy., 45(1), 134-148.
Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J., Cypress, M., Duker, P., Funnell, M. M., Fischl, A. H., Maryniuk, M. D., Siminerio, L., & Vivian, E. (2020). Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: A joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the academy of nutrition and dietetics. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 115(8), 1323-1334.
Reaney, M., Chmiel, N., & Churchill, S. (2018). Foot care, ‘spousal’ support and type 2 diabetes: An exploratory qualitative study. Psychology & Health, 33(9), 1191-1207.
Reaney, M., Gladwin, T., Chmiel, N., & Churchill, S. (2021). Encouraging foot care in people with and without diabetes through narrative communication. Journal of Health Psychology, 13591053211017206.
Reiber, G. E., Vileikyte, L., Boyko, E. J., del Aguila, M., Smith, D. G., Laveryand, L. A., & Boulton, A. J. (1999). Causal pathways for incident lower-extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes from two settings. Diabetes Care, 22(11), 157-162.
Schaper, N. C., van Netten, J. J., Apelqvist, J., Bus, S. A., Hinchliffe, R. J., Lipsky, B. A., & IWGDF Editorial Board. (2020). Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes/Metabolism Research & Reviews, 36(Suppl. 1), e3266.
Searle, A., Gale, L., Campbell, R., Wetherell, M., Dawe, K., Drake, N., Dayan, C., Tarlton, J., Miles, J., & Vedhara, K. (2008). Reducing the burden of chronic wounds: Prevention and management of the diabetic foot in the context of clinical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(Supplement 3), 82-91.
Schubbe, D., Scalia, P., Yen, R., Saunders, C., Cohen, S., Elwyn, G., van den Muijsenbergh, M., & Durand, M. (2020). Using pictures to convey health information: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects on patient and consumer health behaviors and outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(10), 1935-1960.
Singh, S., Jajoo, S., Shukla, S., & Acharya, S. (2020). Educating patients of diabetes mellitus for diabetic foot care. Journal of Family Medicine & Primary Care, 9(1), 367-373.
Trief, P. M., Fisher, L., Sandberg, J., Hessler, D. M., Cibula, D. A., & Weinstock, R. S. (2019). Two for one? Effects of a couples intervention on partners of persons with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetic Medicine, 36(4), 473-481.
Trief, P. M., Fisher, L., Sandberg, J., Cibula, D. A., Dimmock, J., Hessler, D. M., Forken, P., & Weinstock, R. S. (2016). Health and psychosocial outcomes of a telephonic couples behavior change intervention in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care, 39, 2165-2173.
Trief, P., Sandberg, J. G., Ploutz-Snyder, R., Brittain, R., Cibula, D., Scales, K., & Weinstock, R. S. (2011). Promoting couples collaboration in type 2 diabetes: The diabetes support project pilot data. Families, Systems & Health, 29(3), 253-261.
Trief, P. M., Wade, M. J., Britton, K. D., & Weinstock, R. S. (2002). A prospective analysis of marital relationship factors and quality of life in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 25, 1154-1158.
Trief, P. M., Himes, C. L., Orendorff, R., & Weinstock, R. S. (2001). The marital relationship and psychosocial adaptation and glycemic control of individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24(8), 1384-1389.
Vadiveloo, T., Jeffcoate, W., Donnan, P. T., Colhoun, H. C., McGurnaghan, S., Wild, S., McCrimmon, R., Leese, G. P., & Scottish Diabetes Research Network Epidemiology Group. (2018). Amputation-free survival in 17,353 people at high risk for foot ulceration in diabetes: A national observational study. Diabetologia, 61(12), 2590-2597.
van Vleet, M., Helgeson, V. S., Seltman, H. J., Korytkowski, M. T., & Hausmann, L. R. M. (2018). Communally coping with diabetes: An observational investigation using the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(5), 654-663.
Vazini, H., & Barati, M. (2014). The health belief model and self-care behaviors among type 2 diabetic patients. Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Obesity, 6(3), 107-113.
World Health Organisation (WHO). Diabetes. http://www.who.int/diabetes/en/; 2017
Yang, S., Jeong, G., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2014). Correlates of self-care behaviors among low-income elderly women with hypertension in South Korea. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 43(1), 97-106.
Zajdel, M., Helgeson, V. S., Seltman, H. J., Korytkowski, M. T., & Hausmann, L. R. M. (2018). Daily communal coping in couples with type 2 diabetes: Links to mood and self-care. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52(3), 228-238.