A new deep learning pipeline to detect Covid-19 on chest X-ray images using local binary pattern, dual tree complex wavelet transform and convolutional neural networks.
Chest X-ray classification
Convolutional neural networks (CNN)
Corona 2019
Covid-19
Deep learning
Dual tree complex wavelet transform (DT-CWT)
Local binary pattern (LBP)
Journal
Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1573-7497
Titre abrégé: Appl Intell (Dordr)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918284258306676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
accepted:
10
10
2020
pubmed:
13
11
2021
medline:
13
11
2021
entrez:
12
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, which aims at early diagnosis of Covid-19 disease using X-ray images, the deep-learning approach, a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence method, was used, and automatic classification of images was performed using convolutional neural networks (CNN). In the first training-test data set used in the study, there were 230 X-ray images, of which 150 were Covid-19 and 80 were non-Covid-19, while in the second training-test data set there were 476 X-ray images, of which 150 were Covid-19 and 326 were non-Covid-19. Thus, classification results have been provided for two data sets, containing predominantly Covid-19 images and predominantly non-Covid-19 images, respectively. In the study, a 23-layer CNN architecture and a 54-layer CNN architecture were developed. Within the scope of the study, the results were obtained using chest X-ray images directly in the training-test procedures and the sub-band images obtained by applying dual tree complex wavelet transform (DT-CWT) to the above-mentioned images. The same experiments were repeated using images obtained by applying local binary pattern (LBP) to the chest X-ray images. Within the scope of the study, four new result generation pipeline algorithms having been put forward additionally, it was ensured that the experimental results were combined and the success of the study was improved. In the experiments carried out in this study, the training sessions were carried out using the k-fold cross validation method. Here the k value was chosen as 23 for the first and second training-test data sets. Considering the average highest results of the experiments performed within the scope of the study, the values of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F-1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the first training-test data set were 0,9947, 0,9800, 0,9843, 0,9881 and 0,9990 respectively; while for the second training-test data set, they were 0,9920, 0,9939, 0,9891, 0,9828 and 0,9991; respectively. Within the scope of the study, finally, all the images were combined and the training and testing processes were repeated for a total of 556 X-ray images comprising 150 Covid-19 images and 406 non-Covid-19 images, by applying 2-fold cross. In this context, the average highest values of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F-1 score, and AUC for this last training-test data set were found to be 0,9760, 1,0000, 0,9906, 0,9823 and 0,9997; respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34764560
doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-02019-1
pii: 2019
pmc: PMC7609830
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2740-2763Informations de copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestDr. Ceylan declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mr. Yasar declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):929-936
pubmed: 32004427
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Feb 13;2(1):e200034
pubmed: 33778547
Multimed Tools Appl. 2021;80(4):5423-5447
pubmed: 33041635
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:192-197
pubmed: 32112966
IEEE Access. 2020 May 14;8:91916-91923
pubmed: 34192100
Allergy. 2020 Jul;75(7):1730-1741
pubmed: 32077115
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2014 Dec;4(6):475-7
pubmed: 25525580
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 12;382(11):1070-1072
pubmed: 32050059
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):706-712
pubmed: 32109279
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105581
pubmed: 32534344
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Nov;140:110122
pubmed: 32834634
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):408-409
pubmed: 32085849
Appl Soft Comput. 2020 Nov;96:106610
pubmed: 32834798
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):734
pubmed: 32061312
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2020 Jun;43(2):635-640
pubmed: 32524445
Int Orthop. 2020 Aug;44(8):1539-1542
pubmed: 32462314
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):453-455
pubmed: 32284614
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Sep;138:109944
pubmed: 32536759
Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2020 Aug 15;203:104054
pubmed: 32427226
Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;87(4):281-286
pubmed: 32166607
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 27;382(9):872-874
pubmed: 31991079
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Feb 13;2(1):e200028
pubmed: 33778544
J Med Syst. 2020 Feb 4;44(3):59
pubmed: 32020374
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jun;121:103792
pubmed: 32568675
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Feb 17;35(6):e79
pubmed: 32056407
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Jun;53(3):459-466
pubmed: 32220574
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E15-E25
pubmed: 32083985
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 26;15(6):e0235187
pubmed: 32589673
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jul;122:103869
pubmed: 32658740
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):20
pubmed: 32032497
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Jun;53(3):485-487
pubmed: 32198005
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):210-217
pubmed: 32027573
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Apr;21(4):494-500
pubmed: 32100485
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Mar;119(3):747-751
pubmed: 32113824
Med Image Anal. 2020 Oct;65:101794
pubmed: 32781377