Kaolin and Jasmonic acid improved cotton productivity under water stress conditions.
Cotton
Gas exchange characteristics
Jasmonic acid
Kaolin
Water stress
Yield
Journal
Saudi journal of biological sciences
ISSN: 1319-562X
Titre abrégé: Saudi J Biol Sci
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 101543796
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
17
05
2021
revised:
06
07
2021
accepted:
11
07
2021
entrez:
12
11
2021
pubmed:
13
11
2021
medline:
13
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Drought is one of the most emerging threat that causes a severe reduction in cotton plant growth and development. Being cotton is a major cash crop has great threat to prevailing drought events in Pakistan. A field experiment was conducted in Kharif season 2018 at Research Area of MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan to assess the role of foliar applied kaolin and jasmonic acid on vegetative growth, gas exchange and reproductive traits of cotton under normal irrigated and artificial water deficit conditions. The experiment was laid -out in a factorial randomized complete block design with split - split plot arrangement. Main plots were allocated for irrigation levels, sub-plots for two -cotton genotypes viz. NIAB - 878 and SLH - 19 while sub - sub plots for treatments of kaolin and Jasmonic acid. Water deficit stress was created by skipping irrigation at flowering for 21 days. Foliar sprays of Kaolin (5%, w/v) and Jasmonic acid (100 μM) were applied alone or in combination at 60 days after planntinon both to normal irrigated and water-stresse skip irrigation while irrigation water alone was sprayed in control plots. Both cotton genotypes responded variably to normal irrigated and skip conditions. Skipping irrigation for up to 21 days at flowering caused a significant decrease in leaf relative water content, SPAD values, net photosynthetic rate and seed cotton yield in both the genotypes. Seed cotton yield showed an overall decline of 24.7% in skip over Normal irrigated crop. The genotype NIAB - 878 produced maximum seed cotton yield of 3.304 Mg ha
Identifiants
pubmed: 34764776
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.043
pii: S1319-562X(21)00615-X
pmc: PMC8568989
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
6606-6614Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Feb;23(3):2651-62
pubmed: 26432272
J Plant Physiol. 2016 Feb 1;191:45-53
pubmed: 26717011
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Apr;30(4):410-21
pubmed: 17324228
Plant Physiol. 2004 May;135(1):161-72
pubmed: 15133155
Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Apr;51(6):895-911
pubmed: 12777050
Trends Genet. 2003 Jul;19(7):409-13
pubmed: 12850447
J Plant Physiol. 2004 Nov;161(11):1189-202
pubmed: 15602811
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Nov 18;6:997
pubmed: 26635826
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014 Jun;104:202-8
pubmed: 24726929
C R Biol. 2008 Jan;331(1):42-7
pubmed: 18187121
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Feb;124:470-479
pubmed: 26629659
Genet Mol Res. 2013 Feb 27;12(1):552-61
pubmed: 23512672
Plant Cell. 1995 Oct;7(10):1645-1654
pubmed: 12242357
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Sep;106:218-27
pubmed: 27179928
Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Sep;6(9):431-8
pubmed: 11544133
Ann Bot. 2006 Jul;98(1):267-75
pubmed: 16735404
Front Plant Sci. 2012 Mar 08;3:42
pubmed: 22645585
Physiol Plant. 2013 Mar;147(3):296-306
pubmed: 22671923