Can Masked Emotion-Laden Words Prime Emotion-Label Words? An ERP Test on the Mediated Account.

ERP LPC emotion words emotion-label words emotion-laden words

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 07 06 2021
accepted: 21 09 2021
entrez: 12 11 2021
pubmed: 13 11 2021
medline: 13 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present event-related potential (ERP) study explored whether masked emotion-laden words could facilitate the processing of both emotion-label words and emotion-laden words in a valence judgment task. The results revealed that emotion-laden words as primes failed to influence target emotion-label word processing, whereas emotion-laden words facilitated target emotion-laden words in the congruent condition. Specifically, decreased late positivity complex (LPC) was elicited by emotion-laden words primed by emotion-laden words of the same valence than those primed by emotion-laden words of different valence. Nevertheless, no difference was observed for emotion-label words as targets. These findings supported the mediated account that claimed emotion-laden words engendered emotion

Identifiants

pubmed: 34764910
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.721783
pmc: PMC8576488
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

721783

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Wu, Zhang and Yuan.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Sep;2(3):260-80
pubmed: 26151969
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Sep;237(9):2423-2430
pubmed: 31302735
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1374-1385
pubmed: 27553483
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Sep 21;11:455
pubmed: 28983242
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):1857-1875
pubmed: 33629205
Lang Speech. 2019 Dec;62(4):641-651
pubmed: 30354948
Lang Speech. 2016 Sep;59(Pt 3):339-52
pubmed: 29924529
Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;55(9):1830-1849
pubmed: 31464489
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 05;11:986
pubmed: 32581914
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0232133
pubmed: 32569306
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Oct;48(5):1203-1216
pubmed: 31317377
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Jun;48(2):686-728
pubmed: 25987304
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 27;11(5):
pubmed: 33925670
Am Psychol. 2017 Oct;72(7):617-643
pubmed: 29016167
Neurosci Lett. 2019 Apr 23;699:1-7
pubmed: 30677433
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:1-10
pubmed: 30388546
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Apr;45(2):395-406
pubmed: 25732384
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Am J Psychol. 2015 Fall;128(3):323-36
pubmed: 26442339
Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;137(5):834-55
pubmed: 21766999
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2310-2336
pubmed: 31429062

Auteurs

Chenggang Wu (C)

Multilingual Edu-AI Laboratory, School of Education, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.
Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau, China.

Juan Zhang (J)

Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China.

Zhen Yuan (Z)

Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China.

Classifications MeSH