Mechanobiology in cardiac mechanics.
Journal
Biophysical reviews
ISSN: 1867-2450
Titre abrégé: Biophys Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101498573
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
30
07
2021
accepted:
12
08
2021
entrez:
12
11
2021
pubmed:
13
11
2021
medline:
13
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The contraction-relaxation cycle of the heart is one of the most robust mechanical systems in the body that adapts rapidly to the body's needs by changing mechanical parameters. In many respects, we can consider the cardiac system as a complex machine and can use engineering approaches to describe its function. The classical physiology of the heart also focused on understanding function but the new molecular level tools in light microscopy and nanoengineering now enable a deeper understanding of the physiology. The field of mechanobiology has emerged with a focus on how mechanical activity alters biological systems at the molecular level and how those systems in turn control mechanical parameters. In the case of mechanical activity, there are clearly benefits of exercise for the heart, for cancer patients, and for aging but we do not understand the links at a molecular level. Why does regular exercise benefit the heart? We have some preliminary clues at a molecular level about the benefits of physical activity in the cases of cancer and aging; however, there is less known about how exercise affects cardiovascular performance. Unlike the omics approaches which generally link proteins to processes, a mechanobiological understanding of a process explains how forces and mechanical activity will regulate the process through modifications of protein activities. In other words, mechanical activity is an essential component of most biological systems that is transduced into biochemical changes in protein activity. Further, it follows logically that if a mechanical parameter of the cardiac system is typically controlled, then cellular mechanosensing systems must be able to directly or indirectly measure that parameter. The challenge is to understand how changes in activity of the heart are controlled in the short term and then how the system adapts to the integrated level of activity over the longer term. By way of introduction to molecular mechanobiology, I will present examples of mechanosensing from the molecular to the cellular scale and how they may be integrated at the cell and tissue levels. An important element of Mechanobiology at the system level is the physiological state of the cell: i.e., the cell in a senescent state, a cancer state, or a normal cell state (Sheetz 2019). The background for the mechanobiological approach is discussed in "The Cell as a Machine" (Sheetz and Yu, Cambridge Univ Press, 2018), which considers cell states and the molecular systems underlying the important cellular functions. A major challenge in mechanobiology is the understanding of the transduction of mechanical activity into changes in cell function. Of particular relevance here is the benefit of exercise to cardiac performance. This has been seen in many cases and there are a variety of factors that contribute. Further, exercise will benefit cancer patients and will reverse some of the adverse effects of aging. Exercise will cause increased cardiac activity that will be sensed by many mechanosensory systems from a molecular to a cellular level both in the heart and in the vasculature. At a molecular level in cardiac systems, proteins are able to measure stress and strain and to generate appropriate signals of the magnitude of stress and strain that can regulate the cellular contractility and other parameters. The protein sensors are generally passive systems that give a transient measure of local parameters such as the stress at cell-cell junctions during contraction and the strain of the sarcomeres during relaxation. Large stresses at the junctions can activate signaling systems that can reduce contractility or over time activate remodeling of the junctions to better support larger stresses. The proteins involved and their sensory mechanisms are not known currently; however, the mechanosensitive channel, Piezo1, has been implicated in the transduction process in the vasculature (Beech 2018). In the case of strain sensors, large stretches of titin during relaxation can unfold more titin domains that can send signals to the cell. Two different mechanisms of strain sensing are likely in titin. The titin kinase domain is activated by strain but the substrates of the kinase are not know in vivo (Linke 2018). In the backbone of titin are many Ig domains that unfold at different forces and unfolding could cause the binding of proteins that would then activate enzymatic pathways to alter the contractile cycle to give the proper level of strain (Ait-Mou et al. 2017; Granzier et al. 2014; Granzier et al. 2009). The cell-matrix adhesion protein, talin, has eleven cryptic binding sites for another adhesion protein, vinculin, that are revealed by the unfolding of domains in the talin molecule (Yao et al. 2016). Since some domains unfold at lower forces than others, small strains will preferentially unfold those domains, making the system an excellent sensor of the extent of stretch as expected for titin. Because there is an ordered array of many titin molecules, the sensing of strain can be very sensitive to small changes in sarcomere length. Needless to say, titin is only one part of the regulatory system that controls sarcomere length. As one goes more deeply into the working of the system, it is evident that many additional mechanosensory elements are involved in maintaining a functioning cardiac system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34765042
doi: 10.1007/s12551-021-00827-4
pii: 827
pmc: PMC8555090
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
583-585Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestI have financial interest in Mechanobiologics, Inc., that is involved in developing and commercializing mechanical treatments for cancer and aging.
Références
Nat Mater. 2020 Feb;19(2):239-250
pubmed: 31659296
Annu Rev Physiol. 2019 Feb 10;81:585-605
pubmed: 30403543
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 7;111(40):14589-94
pubmed: 25246556
Biomaterials. 2021 Aug;275:120866
pubmed: 34044258
Nat Commun. 2016 Jul 07;7:11966
pubmed: 27384267
Circ Res. 2009 Sep 11;105(6):557-64
pubmed: 19679835
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(47):e18027
pubmed: 31764820
Aging Cell. 2021 Jan;20(1):e13294
pubmed: 33378138
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Oct 6;35:169-190
pubmed: 31412209
Annu Rev Physiol. 2018 Feb 10;80:389-411
pubmed: 29131758
J Physiol. 2018 Mar 15;596(6):979-984
pubmed: 29194632
Dev Cell. 2018 Feb 5;44(3):326-336.e3
pubmed: 29396114
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2017 Nov;130(Pt B):281-287
pubmed: 28648628
Nat Cell Biol. 2016 Jan;18(1):33-42
pubmed: 26619148