Two stage treatment of a proximal humeral fracture-dislocation with vascular injury: Case report of a multidisciplinary approach.
Brachial plexus injury
Fracture-dislocation
Multidisciplinary approach
Proximal humeral fracture
Vascular injury
Journal
Trauma case reports
ISSN: 2352-6440
Titre abrégé: Trauma Case Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101711730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
accepted:
23
10
2021
entrez:
12
11
2021
pubmed:
13
11
2021
medline:
13
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Proximal humeral fracture-dislocation associated with neurovascular injury is rare events, associated with poorer outcomes and higher risk of complications. A multidisciplinary approach including the orthopaedic and vascular department is essential in treating such kind of injury. The goal of the treatment is to restore the vascular supply and stabilize the fracture. Usually the orthopaedic surgical stabilization provides a stable substrate for the vascular repair. We report a case of 70 years old woman who sustained a 4 part proximal humerus fracture-dislocation with vascular injury at the level of the transition of the subclavian into axillary artery. Because of the impending severe limb ischemia, the priority of the treatment was given to vascular surgical intervention with a by-pass procedure. After 14 days a reverse shoulder prosthesis was thought to be the best alternative in the second stage surgery. At 18 months follow-up we achieved good clinical and radiological outcomes. Although a lack of consensus on the priority of treatments, we achieved good result following our proposed algorithm of treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34765715
doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2021.100547
pii: S2352-6440(21)00152-7
pmc: PMC8569709
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
100547Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All authors disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding.
Références
Med Glas (Zenica). 2019 Aug 01;16(2):
pubmed: 31257835
Z Orthop Unfall. 2020 Aug;158(4):406-413
pubmed: 31525793
Ann Surg. 1970 Sep;172(3):351-60
pubmed: 4917999
Injury. 2015 Jul;46(7):1367-71
pubmed: 25986664
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Nov;28(11):659-63
pubmed: 24682164
Am J Emerg Med. 1998 Mar;16(2):154-6
pubmed: 9517691
JSES Open Access. 2018 Feb 01;2(1):100-103
pubmed: 30675575
Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7
pubmed: 16814787
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998 May-Jun;7(3):292-4
pubmed: 9658355
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 May;33:210-9
pubmed: 26965805