Prevention of Image Quality Degradation in Wider Field Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Images Via Image Averaging.
Journal
Translational vision science & technology
ISSN: 2164-2591
Titre abrégé: Transl Vis Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2021
01 11 2021
Historique:
entrez:
12
11
2021
pubmed:
13
11
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the mutual effect of widening the field of view and multiple en face image averaging on the quality of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images. This prospective, observational, cross-sectional case series included 20 eyes of 20 healthy volunteers with no history of ocular or systemic disease. OCTA imaging of a 3 × 3-mm, 6 × 6-mm, and 12 × 12-mm area centered on the fovea was performed nine times using the PLEX Elite 9000. We acquired averaged OCTA images generated from nine en face OCTA images. The corresponding areas in the three scan sizes were evaluated for the original single-scanned OCTA images and averaged OCTA images both qualitatively and quantitatively. Quantitative measurements included vessel density (VD), vessel length density (VLD), fractal dimension (FD), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Significant differences in VD, VLD, FD, and CNR (P < 0.001) were observed due to the mutual effect of averaging and differences in scan size. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations indicated that the quality of 6 × 6-mm averaged images was equal to or better than that of 3 × 3-mm single-scanned images. However, the quality of 12 × 12-mm averaged images did not reach that of 3 × 3-mm single-scanned images. To some extent, multiple en face OCTA image averaging can compensate for the deterioration in image quality caused by widening the field of view. Multiple en face OCTA image averaging can be a technique for acquiring wider field OCTA images with good quality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34767625
pii: 2778073
doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.13.16
pmc: PMC8590158
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16Références
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;257(6):1199-1206
pubmed: 30972485
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80106
pubmed: 24265796
Opt Express. 2012 Feb 13;20(4):4710-25
pubmed: 22418228
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Dec 3;59(15):5847-5853
pubmed: 30535425
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Jan 1;59(1):231-237
pubmed: 29340651
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;103(2):216-221
pubmed: 29706601
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 1;135(10):1092-1098
pubmed: 28910435
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jul;124(7):944-952
pubmed: 28318637
J Clin Med. 2020 May 02;9(5):
pubmed: 32370282
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997 Aug;16(4):416-25
pubmed: 9262999
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 10;10(1):6172
pubmed: 32277172
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;256(7):1275-1280
pubmed: 29713816
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 May;64:1-55
pubmed: 29229445
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;133(1):45-50
pubmed: 25317632
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Sep 1;57(11):4940-4947
pubmed: 27654421
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;258(8):1639-1648
pubmed: 32361802
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:509783
pubmed: 22792084
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 5;112(18):E2395-402
pubmed: 25897021
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Dec 2;60(15):4985-4990
pubmed: 31791062
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT362-70
pubmed: 27409494
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;96(7):e820-e827
pubmed: 29855147
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 1;135(11):1197-1204
pubmed: 28983552
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169385
pubmed: 28068370