Surgical Strategy for the Management of Cervical Deformity Is Based on Type of Cervical Deformity.

adult spinal deformity cervical deformity cervical osteotomy surgical strategy surgical technique

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 30 08 2021
revised: 11 10 2021
accepted: 11 10 2021
entrez: 13 11 2021
pubmed: 14 11 2021
medline: 14 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cervical deformity morphotypes based on type and location of deformity have previously been described. This study aimed to examine the surgical strategies implemented to treat these deformity types and identify if differences in treatment strategies impact surgical outcomes. Our hypothesis was that surgical strategies will differ based on different morphologies of cervical deformity. Adult patients enrolled in a prospective cervical deformity database were classified into four deformity types (Flatneck (FN), Focal kyphosis (FK), Cervicothoracic kyphosis (CTK) and Coronal (C)), as previously described. We analyzed group differences in demographics, preoperative symptoms, health-related quality of life scores (HRQOLs), and surgical strategies were evaluated, and postop radiographic and HROQLs at 1+ year follow up were compared. 90/109 eligible patients (mean age 63.3 ± 9.2, 64% female, CCI 1.01 ± 1.36) were evaluated. Group distributions included FN = 33%, FK = 29%, CTK = 29%, and C = 9%. Significant differences were noted in the surgical approaches for the four types of deformities, with FN and FK having a high number of anterior/posterior (APSF) approaches, while CTK and C had more posterior only (PSF) approaches. For FN and FK, PSF was utilized more in cases with prior anterior surgery (70% vs. 25%). For FN group, PSF resulted in inferior neck disability index compared to those receiving APSF suggesting APSF is superior for FN types. CTK types had more three-column osteotomies (3CO) ( The four types of cervical deformities had different surgical strategies to achieve improvements in HRQOLs. FN and FK types were more often treated with APSF surgery, while types CTK and C were more likely to undergo PSF. CTK deformities had the highest number of 3COs. This information may provide guidelines for the successful management of cervical deformities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34768346
pii: jcm10214826
doi: 10.3390/jcm10214826
pmc: PMC8584313
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Spine J. 2020 Aug;20(8):1267-1275
pubmed: 32209421
Global Spine J. 2019 May;9(3):303-314
pubmed: 31192099
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e541-e547
pubmed: 32339741
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):116-123
pubmed: 31361727
Eur Spine J. 2017 Aug;26(8):2128-2137
pubmed: 28361367
World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e61-e68
pubmed: 29248781
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jan;24 Suppl 1:S23-30
pubmed: 25394862
Eur Spine J. 2016 Feb;25(2):583-9
pubmed: 26195078
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013 Apr;24(2):249-74
pubmed: 23561563
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Jan;59:155-161
pubmed: 30459012
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Feb;71(2):170-82
pubmed: 2645290
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 14;21(1):28
pubmed: 31937290
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 May 1;14(5):515-523
pubmed: 28973349
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):160-166
pubmed: 31772428
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 1;31(3):299-302
pubmed: 16449902
Eur Spine J. 2019 Feb;28(2):324-344
pubmed: 30483961
Neurosurgery. 2017 May 1;80(5):716-725
pubmed: 28368524
Neurosurgery. 2018 Dec 1;83(6):1277-1285
pubmed: 29351637
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Aug;15(2):174-81
pubmed: 21529128
Neurosurgery. 2018 Feb 1;82(2):192-201
pubmed: 28575457
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):523-36
pubmed: 20967471
Neurosurgery. 2018 Nov 1;83(5):1031-1039
pubmed: 29281107
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jul 1;85(1):E40-E51
pubmed: 30272188
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 15;:1-7
pubmed: 31731275
Neurosurgery. 2018 Oct 1;83(4):651-659
pubmed: 28950349
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 1;32(2):182-190
pubmed: 31675700
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;91:228-37
pubmed: 27086260

Auteurs

Han Jo Kim (HJ)

Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Sohrab Virk (S)

Department of Orthopedics, Northwell Health, Great Neck, New York, NY 11021, USA.

Jonathan Elysee (J)

Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Christopher Ames (C)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

Peter Passias (P)

Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Christopher Shaffrey (C)

Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Gregory Mundis (G)

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.

Themistocles Protopsaltis (T)

Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Munish Gupta (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63010, USA.

Eric Klineberg (E)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Robert Hart (R)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Justin S Smith (JS)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.

Shay Bess (S)

Denver International Spine Center, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children at Presbyterian St. Luke's, Denver, CO 80218, USA.

Frank Schwab (F)

Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Renaud Lafage (R)

Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Virginie Lafage (V)

Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Classifications MeSH