Sustainable Development Goals
community-based research
equity
extractive industries
focus group discussion
health impact assessment
social determinants of health
sub-Saharan Africa
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 10 2021
20 10 2021
Historique:
received:
14
06
2021
revised:
29
09
2021
accepted:
12
10
2021
entrez:
13
11
2021
pubmed:
14
11
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health equity features prominently in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, yet there are wide disparities in health between and within countries. In settings of natural resource extraction (e.g., industrial mines), the health of surrounding communities is affected through myriad changes in the physical, social, and economic environment. How changes triggered by such projects translate into health inequities is poorly understood. This qualitative study explores potential layers of inequities by systematically coding perceived inequities of affected communities. Drawing on the framework method, we thematically analyzed data from 83 focus group discussions, which enrolled 791 participants from 10 study sites in Burkina Faso, Mozambique, and Tanzania. Participants perceived inequities related to their individual characteristics, intermediate factors acting on the community level, and structural conditions. Due to environmental pollution and land loss, participants were concerned about unsecured livelihoods. Positive impacts, such as job opportunities at the mine, remained scarce for local communities and were claimed not to be equally distributed among community members. Extractive industries bear considerable risks to widen existing health gaps. In order to create equal opportunities among affected populations, the wider determinants of health must be considered more explicitly in the licensing process of resource extraction projects.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Health equity features prominently in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, yet there are wide disparities in health between and within countries. In settings of natural resource extraction (e.g., industrial mines), the health of surrounding communities is affected through myriad changes in the physical, social, and economic environment. How changes triggered by such projects translate into health inequities is poorly understood.
METHODS
This qualitative study explores potential layers of inequities by systematically coding perceived inequities of affected communities. Drawing on the framework method, we thematically analyzed data from 83 focus group discussions, which enrolled 791 participants from 10 study sites in Burkina Faso, Mozambique, and Tanzania.
RESULTS
Participants perceived inequities related to their individual characteristics, intermediate factors acting on the community level, and structural conditions. Due to environmental pollution and land loss, participants were concerned about unsecured livelihoods. Positive impacts, such as job opportunities at the mine, remained scarce for local communities and were claimed not to be equally distributed among community members.
CONCLUSION
Extractive industries bear considerable risks to widen existing health gaps. In order to create equal opportunities among affected populations, the wider determinants of health must be considered more explicitly in the licensing process of resource extraction projects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34769535
pii: ijerph182111015
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111015
pmc: PMC8582703
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Nov;16(11):1614-1618
pubmed: 32893133
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 21;17(10):
pubmed: 32455773
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 8;9(4):e17138
pubmed: 32266876
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Jun;61(6):473-8
pubmed: 17496254
PLoS Med. 2006 May;3(6):e106
pubmed: 16681414
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Mar 1;30(Suppl_1):i24-i27
pubmed: 32391900
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252433
pubmed: 34086737
Indian J Med Ethics. 2007 Oct-Dec;4(4):176-80
pubmed: 18630239
Environ Health. 2008 Nov 27;7:61
pubmed: 19038020
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Apr 1;91(4):298-305
pubmed: 23599554
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;258:113138
pubmed: 32574889
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 25;17(9):
pubmed: 32344882
Afr Health Sci. 2015 Dec;15(4):1330-8
pubmed: 26958038
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42-5
pubmed: 7613329
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Global Health. 2015 Mar 21;11:13
pubmed: 25890267
Int J Public Health. 2019 Jan;64(1):15-26
pubmed: 29911285
Health Promot Int. 2019 Aug 1;34(4):847-858
pubmed: 29800457
Rev Environ Health. 2019 Dec 18;34(4):391-401
pubmed: 31603860
Global Health. 2019 Feb 19;15(1):13
pubmed: 30782175
Health Place. 2018 Jul;52:135-147
pubmed: 29886130
Clin Occup Environ Med. 2004 Feb;4(1):9-26
pubmed: 15043361
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):
pubmed: 32532108
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(11):1712-20
pubmed: 22361090
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1423-1459
pubmed: 28916366
Glob Public Health. 2019 Jun - Jul;14(6-7):847-862
pubmed: 30500313
Global Health. 2020 Feb 20;16(1):15
pubmed: 32079530
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 19;14(3):
pubmed: 28335490
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Dec;83(12):948-53
pubmed: 16462988
Lancet. 2007 Sep 29;370(9593):1153-63
pubmed: 17905168
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177306
pubmed: 28493934
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Oct;44(5):673-676
pubmed: 28927354
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015 Sep 16;15:24
pubmed: 26377091
Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(3):423-41
pubmed: 19771949
BMC Womens Health. 2018 May 1;18(1):62
pubmed: 29716578