Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around "Black Market" Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review.
Gambling Act review
Great Britain
black market
gambling
regulation
unhealthy commodities
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 11 2021
03 11 2021
Historique:
received:
14
09
2021
revised:
27
10
2021
accepted:
29
10
2021
entrez:
13
11
2021
pubmed:
14
11
2021
medline:
19
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Commercial gambling is increasingly viewed as being part of the unhealthy commodities industries, in which products contribute to preventable ill-health globally. Britain has one of the world's most liberal gambling markets, meaning that the regulatory changes there have implications for developments elsewhere. A review of the British Gambling Act 2005 is underway. This has generated a range of actions by the industry, including mobilising arguments around the threat of the "black market". We critically explore industry's framing of these issues as part of their strategy to resist regulatory change during the Gambling Act review. We used a predefined review protocol to explore industry narratives about the "black market" in media reports published between 8 December 2020 and 26 May 2021. Fifty-five articles were identified and reviewed, and themes were narratively synthesised to examine industry framing of the "black market". The black market was framed in terms of economic threat and loss, and a direct connection was made between its growth and increased regulation. The articles mainly presented gambling industry perspectives uncritically, citing industry-generated evidence (
Identifiants
pubmed: 34770077
pii: ijerph182111566
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111566
pmc: PMC8582964
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 200306/Z/15/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S019200/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Can J Public Health. 2011 Nov-Dec;102(6):417-20
pubmed: 22164549
J Gambl Stud. 2009 Jun;25(2):215-25
pubmed: 19322645
Addiction. 2007 Sep;102(9):1335-9
pubmed: 17697267
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jan;5(1):e14-e15
pubmed: 31831371
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jul;107(7):1047-1049
pubmed: 28590869
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1078-1083
pubmed: 28978619
Milbank Q. 2009 Mar;87(1):259-94
pubmed: 19298423
Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1358-61
pubmed: 11527755
Addict Behav. 2021 Jul;118:106876
pubmed: 33647707
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Mar;53:123-124
pubmed: 29358082
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0255145
pubmed: 34437561
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2):
pubmed: 33593757
Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:107-112
pubmed: 32434694
Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):360-1
pubmed: 26001698
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Feb 08;6(4):183-189
pubmed: 28812801
Tob Control. 2019 May;28(3):334-345
pubmed: 30135114
Addiction. 2021 Jan;116(1):32-40
pubmed: 33084199
BMJ. 2019 May 8;365:l1807
pubmed: 31068335
Tob Control. 2015 Jun;24(e2):e168-77
pubmed: 25472733
BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2613
pubmed: 32611591
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1212-1214
pubmed: 31443927
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Aug;6(8):e614-e619
pubmed: 34166631
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e35-43
pubmed: 24614041