A Simplified Method for Considering Achilles Tendon Curvature in the Assessment of Tendon Elongation.
Achilles tendon
tendon elongation
tendon strain
ultrasound
walking and running
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Nov 2021
06 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
22
09
2021
revised:
23
10
2021
accepted:
02
11
2021
entrez:
13
11
2021
pubmed:
14
11
2021
medline:
17
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The consideration of the Achilles tendon (AT) curvature is crucial for the precise determination of AT length and strain. We previously established an ultrasound-kinematic-based method to quantify the curvature, using a line of reflective foil skin markers covering the AT from origin to insertion. The current study aimed to simplify the method by reducing the number of markers while maintaining high accuracy. Eleven participants walked (1.4 m/s) and ran (2.5, 3.5 m/s) on a treadmill, and the AT curvature was quantified using reflective foil markers aligned with the AT between the origin on the gastrocnemius myotendinous-junction (tracked by ultrasound) and a marker on the calcaneal insertion. Foil markers were then systematically removed, and the introduced error on the assessment of AT length and strain was calculated. We found a significant main effect of marker number on the measurement error of AT length and strain (p<0.001). Using more than 30% of the full marker-set for walking and 50% for running, the R2 of the AT length error saturated, corresponding to average errors of <0.1 mm and <0.15% strain. Therefore, a substantially reduced marker-set, associated with a marginal error, can be recommended for considering the AT curvature in the determination of AT length and strain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34770691
pii: s21217387
doi: 10.3390/s21217387
pmc: PMC8588279
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Jun;113(6):1605-15
pubmed: 23328797
J Appl Biomech. 2015 Oct;31(5):383-8
pubmed: 25950421
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Aug;99(2):603-8
pubmed: 15845776
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Jun;18(3):503-8
pubmed: 17254800
J Biomech. 2010 Dec 1;43(16):3073-9
pubmed: 20863501
J Biomech. 2018 Apr 27;72:200-206
pubmed: 29602476
J Biomech Eng. 2001 Feb;123(1):27-32
pubmed: 11277298
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Dec 1;123(6):1433-1442
pubmed: 28860176
J Exp Biol. 2017 Nov 15;220(Pt 22):4141-4149
pubmed: 28883087
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 12;8(1):4319
pubmed: 29531268
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Dec;111(12):3151-4
pubmed: 21455617
J Biomech. 2016 Oct 3;49(14):3200-3207
pubmed: 27544621
J Exp Biol. 2005 Dec;208(Pt 24):4715-25
pubmed: 16326953
BMC Biomed Eng. 2019 Dec 3;1:28
pubmed: 32903293
J Exp Biol. 2007 Aug;210(Pt 15):2743-53
pubmed: 17644689
Physiol Rep. 2014 Oct 09;2(10):
pubmed: 25303951
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;53(1):11-12
pubmed: 30030281
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 7;268(1464):229-33
pubmed: 11217891
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 12;11(1):5830
pubmed: 33712639
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 May 15;118(10):1266-75
pubmed: 25814636
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006 Oct;16(5):413-22
pubmed: 16309922
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Nov;13(6):646-50
pubmed: 20478742
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Jan;28(1):126-137
pubmed: 28263394
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013 May;110(5):1495-507
pubmed: 23242991
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Nov;83(4 -5):363-9
pubmed: 11138576
J Exp Biol. 2014 Nov 15;217(Pt 22):4010-7
pubmed: 25267851
Front Physiol. 2020 Jun 26;11:723
pubmed: 32670094
Sports Med Open. 2015 Dec;1(1):7
pubmed: 27747846