Upfront Surgery vs. Primary Chemoradiation in an Unselected, Bicentric Patient Cohort with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Matched-Pair Analysis.
matched-pair analysis
oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
primary chemoradiation
survival
therapy
upfront surgery
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Oct 2021
20 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
05
09
2021
revised:
16
10
2021
accepted:
17
10
2021
entrez:
13
11
2021
pubmed:
14
11
2021
medline:
14
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The two pillars of therapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) are upfront surgery and primary chemoradiotherapy. Substantial regional preferences exist with regard to the selection of treatment. Despite new therapeutic approaches, patient survival remains poor, with an approximate overall survival (OS) rate of 50% at five years. This study was conducted to investigate a potential survival benefit depending on the treatment modality in OPSCC patients. We retrospectively collected data of 853 patients with histologically confirmed OPSCC from the Giessen and Maastricht cancer databases. To identify risk factors affecting survival, a Cox-proportional hazard model was applied to 442 patients with complete data sets. Based on this cohort a matched-pair analysis with 158 patients was performed to compare OS rates of patients treated either with upfront surgery or primary chemoradiation. For the collective cohort, patients treated with upfront surgery had significantly improved OS rates compared to patients treated with primary chemoradiation. In the matched-pair analysis adjusted for patients' T-, N- and HPV-status as well as risk profile, we observed that both treatment approaches offered equivalent OS rates. Our study emphasizes that treatment recommendations should be made whenever possible on the basis of side-effect profiles caused by the therapeutic approach used. To draw further conclusions, results of the ongoing "best of" (NCT2984410) study are eagerly awaited, investigating the functional outcome after treatment of OPSCC patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34771428
pii: cancers13215265
doi: 10.3390/cancers13215265
pmc: PMC8582414
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 Jun;12(6):375-382
pubmed: 31003993
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):154-60
pubmed: 20864267
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):367-374
pubmed: 33004271
Oral Oncol. 2016 Oct;61:41-6
pubmed: 27688103
Oncol Res Treat. 2017;40(6):320-327
pubmed: 28558385
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun;29(3):290-7
pubmed: 16755183
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jun 6;116(12):1604-1611
pubmed: 28472822
Oncology. 2013;84(5):290-8
pubmed: 23485940
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jun;118(12):1672-1681
pubmed: 29795309
Int J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;22(6):1001-1008
pubmed: 28624863
Cancer. 2014 May 15;120(10):1462-70
pubmed: 24578320
Head Neck. 2013 May;35(5):747-55
pubmed: 22267298
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):40-50
pubmed: 30449625
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 28;8(9):14770-14776
pubmed: 28122353
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1349-1359
pubmed: 31416685
Am J Pathol. 2003 Mar;162(3):747-53
pubmed: 12598309
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S90-S96
pubmed: 27841123
Cancer. 2002 Jun 1;94(11):2967-80
pubmed: 12115386
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 May;261(5):276-81
pubmed: 14551793
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):51-60
pubmed: 30449623
Laryngoscope. 2006 Dec;116(12):2156-61
pubmed: 17146389