"That's the whole thing about vaping, it's custom tasty goodness": a meta-ethnography of young adults' perceptions and experiences of e-cigarette use.


Journal

Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy
ISSN: 1747-597X
Titre abrégé: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258060

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 11 2021
Historique:
accepted: 08 10 2021
entrez: 13 11 2021
pubmed: 14 11 2021
medline: 23 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

E-cigarettes are increasing in popularity, particularly among young adults. With public health organisations contesting the possible benefits of e-cigarettes, research is required to explore young adults' use of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation and recreational tool. This study examined existing qualitative data to understand how transition into adulthood and issues of identity affect young adults' perceptions and experiences of e-cigarette use. A meta-ethnography was conducted to examine how young adults perceive and use e-cigarettes. Data were synthesised using Noblit and Hare's (1988) meta-ethnographic approach. Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological model (1979) was used to conceptualise themes and map findings. A total of 34 studies were included in the review. Young adults viewed e-cigarettes as a safer alternative to traditional cigarette smoking and perceived e-cigarettes as an effective cessation tool. Users were able to personalise their e-cigarette use due to the variety of flavours and devices available. E-cigarettes were found to be a sociable tool as they allowed users to align themselves with their peers who used e-cigarettes and facilitated use within smoke-free environments. Young adults demonstrated high levels of self-efficacy with regards to obtaining e-cigarettes from various retailers and were active consumers of e-cigarette marketing. This meta-ethnography provides an in-depth insight into social norms around e-cigarette use and beliefs that e-cigarettes could be a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes. As young adults increasingly engage with e-cigarettes, there is a need for informed policy decisions regarding appropriate use. Engagement with e-cigarettes is often reflected within social media, so this medium could be a key platform for creating tailored interventions which inform young adults about the appropriate use of these products.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
E-cigarettes are increasing in popularity, particularly among young adults. With public health organisations contesting the possible benefits of e-cigarettes, research is required to explore young adults' use of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation and recreational tool. This study examined existing qualitative data to understand how transition into adulthood and issues of identity affect young adults' perceptions and experiences of e-cigarette use.
METHODS
A meta-ethnography was conducted to examine how young adults perceive and use e-cigarettes. Data were synthesised using Noblit and Hare's (1988) meta-ethnographic approach. Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological model (1979) was used to conceptualise themes and map findings.
RESULTS
A total of 34 studies were included in the review. Young adults viewed e-cigarettes as a safer alternative to traditional cigarette smoking and perceived e-cigarettes as an effective cessation tool. Users were able to personalise their e-cigarette use due to the variety of flavours and devices available. E-cigarettes were found to be a sociable tool as they allowed users to align themselves with their peers who used e-cigarettes and facilitated use within smoke-free environments. Young adults demonstrated high levels of self-efficacy with regards to obtaining e-cigarettes from various retailers and were active consumers of e-cigarette marketing.
CONCLUSION
This meta-ethnography provides an in-depth insight into social norms around e-cigarette use and beliefs that e-cigarettes could be a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes. As young adults increasingly engage with e-cigarettes, there is a need for informed policy decisions regarding appropriate use. Engagement with e-cigarettes is often reflected within social media, so this medium could be a key platform for creating tailored interventions which inform young adults about the appropriate use of these products.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34772440
doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00416-4
pii: 10.1186/s13011-021-00416-4
pmc: PMC8586839
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

85

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C57440/A21801
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Am Psychol. 2000 May;55(5):469-80
pubmed: 10842426
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Oct;66(7):597-607
pubmed: 29452051
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Aug;57(2):179-85
pubmed: 26115908
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2013;12(4):300-7
pubmed: 24215223
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85
pubmed: 23615206
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 04;15:859
pubmed: 26341634
Tob Control. 2015 Nov;24(6):588-93
pubmed: 25564287
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Oct;18(10):2006-12
pubmed: 27029821
Ethn Health. 2017 Feb;22(1):65-82
pubmed: 27174778
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Psychol Health. 2017 Aug;32(8):1018-1036
pubmed: 28553727
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 06;15(6):
pubmed: 29882828
Subst Abus. 2019;40(1):7-10
pubmed: 30883295
Health Educ Res. 2016 Aug;31(4):429-38
pubmed: 27325619
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):722-727
pubmed: 30820569
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 4;9(4):e026306
pubmed: 30948599
Tob Control. 2019 Mar;28(2):146-151
pubmed: 29853561
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Oct;15(10):1737-44
pubmed: 23703732
Child Health Care. 2017;46(4):379-392
pubmed: 30899129
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Feb 1;159:80-5
pubmed: 26708706
JAMA. 2014 Aug 13;312(6):595-6
pubmed: 24979277
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Oct;55(19):1099-1105
pubmed: 33849909
J Am Coll Health. 2016 Jul;64(5):380-9
pubmed: 26979833
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):14-24
pubmed: 29315420
Am J Health Behav. 2016 Mar;40(2):268-79
pubmed: 26931759
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5):508-14
pubmed: 24012065
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Feb;19(2):208-214
pubmed: 27613919
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):25
pubmed: 30709371
Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1646-57
pubmed: 21668096
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108590
pubmed: 33631546
Obes Rev. 2007 Mar;8 Suppl 1:189-93
pubmed: 17316324
Psychol Health. 2015;30(12):1450-69
pubmed: 26074148
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Aug;94:103227
pubmed: 33780877
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jan 11;14(1):
pubmed: 28085031
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Jul;40(6):1037-1052
pubmed: 29664119
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2088-93
pubmed: 22813086
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Jun;60(6):714-719
pubmed: 28259620
Addiction. 2018 Oct;113(10):1776-1783
pubmed: 28786147
JAMA. 2015 Nov 3;314(17):1871-3
pubmed: 26502219
Addiction. 2016 Sep;111(9):1637-45
pubmed: 26948979
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):295-297
pubmed: 28742433
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Sep 1;40(3):533-539
pubmed: 28977542
BMJ. 2019 Jun 20;365:l2219
pubmed: 31221636
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 16;6(11):e013271
pubmed: 27852721
Subst Abuse. 2019 Aug 19;13:1178221819866210
pubmed: 31456638
Health Educ Res. 2017 Oct 1;32(5):448-454
pubmed: 28931165
Clin Exp Med. 2021 Feb;21(1):15-28
pubmed: 32728975
Perspect Public Health. 2016 Sep;136(5):288-93
pubmed: 26543156
Public Health. 2020 Dec;189:158-161
pubmed: 33249392
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(12):2082-2087
pubmed: 31190599
Crit Public Health. 2017;27(4):443-454
pubmed: 29962663
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Sep;64(626):442-3
pubmed: 25179048
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Jan 2;53(1):154-161
pubmed: 28777675
Addict Behav. 2018 Mar;78:51-58
pubmed: 29127784
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 17;15(5):
pubmed: 29772812
Addict Behav Rep. 2018 Dec 07;9:100151
pubmed: 31193745
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Feb;17(2):212-8
pubmed: 25378683
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1235-41
pubmed: 25646346
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):81-87
pubmed: 29126149
Am J Health Behav. 2019 Jul 1;43(4):680-690
pubmed: 31239012
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 05;21(2):e11953
pubmed: 30720440
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016 Jul 15;23(3):395-8
pubmed: 27660856
J Community Health. 2016 Oct;41(5):962-8
pubmed: 26957293
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3:iii3-9
pubmed: 24935895

Auteurs

Ananth Ranjit (A)

Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.

Grace McCutchan (G)

Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.

Katherine Brain (K)

Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.

Ria Poole (R)

European Centre for Environment & Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3DH, UK. m.poole@exeter.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH