Patterns of post-mastectomy radiation therapy in clinically node positive breast cancer patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Breast
carcinoma
chemotherapy
radiotherapy
Journal
Turkish journal of medical sciences
ISSN: 1303-6165
Titre abrégé: Turk J Med Sci
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 9441758
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Nov 2021
13 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
18
09
2021
accepted:
13
11
2021
entrez:
13
11
2021
pubmed:
14
11
2021
medline:
14
11
2021
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To analyze postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) utilization and its association with overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with node positive breast cancer who are pathologically node negative (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with clinical T1-4 node-positive non-metastatic breast cancer who received NAC and underwent mastectomy with pathologically negative lymph node sampling. Multivariable regression models identified factors associated with PMRT use. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate predictors of mortality. The study included 8,766 clinically node-positive patients who met the study criteria. PMRT was delivered to 61.5% of patients. Overall PMRT utilization rate increased over the study period from 54.4% in 2004 to 65.2% in 2011. Predictors of PMRT use included larger tumor size, increasing clinical N stage, higher grade disease, receipt of hormone therapy, and greater number of lymph nodes examined. Unadjusted 5-year OS was 84.1% in the PMRT group and 83.8% in the non-PMRT group (p=NS). PMRT was not significantly associated with survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.03). The delivery of PMRT has increased over time in women presenting with clinically node positive breast cancer who convert to ypN0 after NAC. While we identified multiple independent socioeconomic and clinical predictors of both PMRT utilization and survival, PMRT itself was not significantly associated with survival.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To analyze postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) utilization and its association with overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with node positive breast cancer who are pathologically node negative (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with clinical T1-4 node-positive non-metastatic breast cancer who received NAC and underwent mastectomy with pathologically negative lymph node sampling. Multivariable regression models identified factors associated with PMRT use. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate predictors of mortality.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study included 8,766 clinically node-positive patients who met the study criteria. PMRT was delivered to 61.5% of patients. Overall PMRT utilization rate increased over the study period from 54.4% in 2004 to 65.2% in 2011. Predictors of PMRT use included larger tumor size, increasing clinical N stage, higher grade disease, receipt of hormone therapy, and greater number of lymph nodes examined. Unadjusted 5-year OS was 84.1% in the PMRT group and 83.8% in the non-PMRT group (p=NS). PMRT was not significantly associated with survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.03).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The delivery of PMRT has increased over time in women presenting with clinically node positive breast cancer who convert to ypN0 after NAC. While we identified multiple independent socioeconomic and clinical predictors of both PMRT utilization and survival, PMRT itself was not significantly associated with survival.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34773699
doi: 10.3906/sag-2109-200
pmc: PMC10381209
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 1;20(1):17-23
pubmed: 11773149
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):1004-9
pubmed: 17418973
Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2544-52
pubmed: 25902916
Cancer. 2013 Jan 1;119(1):16-25
pubmed: 22736498
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):e1-7
pubmed: 21377284
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 10;30(32):3960-6
pubmed: 23032615
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 1;22(23):4691-9
pubmed: 15570071
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127-35
pubmed: 24656685
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 2;337(14):949-55
pubmed: 9395428
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jan 1;88(1):65-72
pubmed: 24161425
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Oct 3;82(19):1539-45
pubmed: 2402015
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jul;15(7):2483-93
pubmed: 9215816
Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1641-8
pubmed: 10335782