Roads constrain movement across behavioural processes in a partially migratory ungulate.
Capreolus capreolus
Connectivity
Dispersal
Habitat selection
Migration
Roads
Roe deer
Step selection analysis
Ungulates
Journal
Movement ecology
ISSN: 2051-3933
Titre abrégé: Mov Ecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101635009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Nov 2021
13 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
19
03
2021
accepted:
23
10
2021
entrez:
14
11
2021
pubmed:
15
11
2021
medline:
15
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Human disturbance alters animal movement globally and infrastructure, such as roads, can act as physical barriers that impact behaviour across multiple spatial scales. In ungulates, roads can particularly hamper key ecological processes such as dispersal and migration, which ensure functional connectivity among populations, and may be particularly important for population performance in highly human-dominated landscapes. The impact of roads on some aspects of ungulate behaviour has already been studied. However, potential differences in response to roads during migration, dispersal and home range movements have never been evaluated. Addressing these issues is particularly important to assess the resistance of European landscapes to the range of wildlife movement processes, and to evaluate how animals adjust to anthropogenic constraints. We analysed 95 GPS trajectories from 6 populations of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) across the Alps and central Europe. We investigated how roe deer movements were affected by landscape characteristics, including roads, and we evaluated potential differences in road avoidance among resident, migratory and dispersing animals (hereafter, movement modes). First, using Net Squared Displacement and a spatio-temporal clustering algorithm, we classified individuals as residents, migrants or dispersers. We then identified the start and end dates of the migration and dispersal trajectories, and retained only the GPS locations that fell between those dates (i.e., during transience). Finally, we used the resulting trajectories to perform an integrated step selection analysis. We found that roe deer moved through more forested areas during the day and visited less forested areas at night. They also minimised elevation gains and losses along their movement trajectories. Road crossings were strongly avoided at all times of day, but when they occurred, they were more likely to occur during longer steps and in more forested areas. Road avoidance did not vary among movement modes and, during dispersal and migration, it remained high and consistent with that expressed during home range movements. Roads can represent a major constraint to movement across modes and populations, potentially limiting functional connectivity at multiple ecological scales. In particular, they can affect migrating individuals that track seasonal resources, and dispersing animals searching for novel ranges.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Human disturbance alters animal movement globally and infrastructure, such as roads, can act as physical barriers that impact behaviour across multiple spatial scales. In ungulates, roads can particularly hamper key ecological processes such as dispersal and migration, which ensure functional connectivity among populations, and may be particularly important for population performance in highly human-dominated landscapes. The impact of roads on some aspects of ungulate behaviour has already been studied. However, potential differences in response to roads during migration, dispersal and home range movements have never been evaluated. Addressing these issues is particularly important to assess the resistance of European landscapes to the range of wildlife movement processes, and to evaluate how animals adjust to anthropogenic constraints.
METHODS
METHODS
We analysed 95 GPS trajectories from 6 populations of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) across the Alps and central Europe. We investigated how roe deer movements were affected by landscape characteristics, including roads, and we evaluated potential differences in road avoidance among resident, migratory and dispersing animals (hereafter, movement modes). First, using Net Squared Displacement and a spatio-temporal clustering algorithm, we classified individuals as residents, migrants or dispersers. We then identified the start and end dates of the migration and dispersal trajectories, and retained only the GPS locations that fell between those dates (i.e., during transience). Finally, we used the resulting trajectories to perform an integrated step selection analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We found that roe deer moved through more forested areas during the day and visited less forested areas at night. They also minimised elevation gains and losses along their movement trajectories. Road crossings were strongly avoided at all times of day, but when they occurred, they were more likely to occur during longer steps and in more forested areas. Road avoidance did not vary among movement modes and, during dispersal and migration, it remained high and consistent with that expressed during home range movements.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Roads can represent a major constraint to movement across modes and populations, potentially limiting functional connectivity at multiple ecological scales. In particular, they can affect migrating individuals that track seasonal resources, and dispersing animals searching for novel ranges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34774097
doi: 10.1186/s40462-021-00292-4
pii: 10.1186/s40462-021-00292-4
pmc: PMC8590235
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
57Subventions
Organisme : Natural Environment Research Council
ID : NE/L002612/1
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Dec;24(12):659-69
pubmed: 19748151
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 May 08;1(6):162
pubmed: 28812626
Mov Ecol. 2014 Jul 26;2:15
pubmed: 27148450
Science. 2018 Sep 7;361(6406):1023-1025
pubmed: 30190405
J Anim Ecol. 2021 May;90(5):1027-1043
pubmed: 33583036
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 May 31;284(1855):
pubmed: 28539516
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Mar;80(2):466-76
pubmed: 21105872
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jan;89(1):80-92
pubmed: 31454066
Ecol Appl. 2012 Oct;22(7):2007-20
pubmed: 23210316
Science. 2018 Jan 26;359(6374):466-469
pubmed: 29371471
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jan;89(1):173-185
pubmed: 31469178
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jun;89(6):1329-1339
pubmed: 32144759
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Sep;80(5):1078-87
pubmed: 21545586
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun 14;7(14):5322-5330
pubmed: 28770070
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005 May;80(2):205-25
pubmed: 15921049
Conserv Biol. 2015 Feb;29(1):99-109
pubmed: 25158993
Oecologia. 2007 May;152(2):377-87
pubmed: 17287955
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):54-68
pubmed: 26412564
Mov Ecol. 2014 Feb 07;2(1):4
pubmed: 25520815
J Hered. 2007 Jan-Feb;98(1):13-22
pubmed: 17170074
Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3445-54
pubmed: 20120812
Ecol Lett. 2019 Nov;22(11):1797-1805
pubmed: 31412429
Curr Biol. 2020 Sep 7;30(17):3444-3449.e4
pubmed: 32619482
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Sep 7;275(1646):2025-30
pubmed: 18505718
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:121-33
pubmed: 24056283
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 3;9(1):8214
pubmed: 31160685
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jun;20(6):741-750
pubmed: 28444870
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):43-53
pubmed: 25056207
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50611
pubmed: 23226330
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Mar;88(3):450-460
pubmed: 30449042
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15):
pubmed: 33837149
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 20;10(1):11946
pubmed: 32686691