Vocal size exaggeration may have contributed to the origins of vocalic complexity.
acoustic communication
body size
formants
speech articulation
vocal tract length
voice modulation
Journal
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2970
Titre abrégé: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503623
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 01 2022
03 01 2022
Historique:
entrez:
15
11
2021
pubmed:
16
11
2021
medline:
1
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vocal tract elongation, which uniformly lowers vocal tract resonances (formant frequencies) in animal vocalizations, has evolved independently in several vertebrate groups as a means for vocalizers to exaggerate their apparent body size. Here, we propose that smaller speech-like articulatory movements that alter only individual formants can serve a similar yet less energetically costly size-exaggerating function. To test this, we examine whether uneven formant spacing alters the perceived body size of vocalizers in synthesized human vowels and animal calls. Among six synthetic vowel patterns, those characterized by the lowest first and second formant (the vowel /u/ as in 'boot') are consistently perceived as produced by the largest vocalizer. Crucially, lowering only one or two formants in animal-like calls also conveys the impression of a larger body size, and lowering the second and third formants simultaneously exaggerates perceived size to a similar extent as rescaling all formants. As the articulatory movements required for individual formant shifts are minor compared to full vocal tract extension, they represent a rapid and energetically efficient mechanism for acoustic size exaggeration. We suggest that, by favouring the evolution of uneven formant patterns in vocal communication, this deceptive strategy may have contributed to the origins of the phonemic diversification required for articulated speech. This article is part of the theme issue 'Voice modulation: from origin and mechanism to social impact (Part II)'.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34775821
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0401
pmc: PMC8591380
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5660017']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20200401Références
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Sep;106(3 Pt 1):1511-22
pubmed: 10489707
Curr Biol. 2013 Dec 2;23(23):R1035-6
pubmed: 24309276
Sci Adv. 2016 Dec 09;2(12):e1600723
pubmed: 27957536
Eval Health Prof. 2003 Sep;26(3):258-87
pubmed: 12971200
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jul;4(7):258-267
pubmed: 10859570
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Jan;117(1):305-18
pubmed: 15704423
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 12;12(1):968
pubmed: 33579910
Curr Biol. 2015 Nov 2;25(21):2839-2844
pubmed: 26592343
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):304-318
pubmed: 26857619
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 May 7;272(1566):941-7
pubmed: 16024350
Sci Adv. 2019 Dec 11;5(12):eaaw3916
pubmed: 32076631
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):764-777
pubmed: 30547381
Phonetica. 1984;41(1):1-16
pubmed: 6204347
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169321
pubmed: 28076426
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;220(3-4):319-33
pubmed: 22706551
Biol Lett. 2007 Aug 22;3(4):382-5
pubmed: 17550876
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):778-792
pubmed: 30054898
J Exp Biol. 2018 Sep 11;221(Pt 17):
pubmed: 29941611
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Dec;37(6):529-46
pubmed: 24827156
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Apr;129(4):2201-12
pubmed: 21476675
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jun;141(6):4781
pubmed: 28679275
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1419-21
pubmed: 21960249
Biol Lett. 2013 May 29;9(4):20130270
pubmed: 23720522
Nat Commun. 2016 Sep 06;7:12739
pubmed: 27598835
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1239-1251
pubmed: 28229428
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Dec;126(6):3329-43
pubmed: 20000947
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1971;15(1):117-32
pubmed: 5003335