The Modified Imitation Game: A Method for Measuring Interactional Expertise.

blindness contributory expertise imitation game interactional expertise natural-language processing signal detection tacit knowledge

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 25 06 2021
accepted: 05 10 2021
entrez: 15 11 2021
pubmed: 16 11 2021
medline: 16 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The study of the sociology of scientific knowledge distinguishes between contributory and interactional experts. Contributory experts have practical expertise-they can "walk the walk." Interactional experts have internalized the tacit components of expertise-they can "talk the talk" but are not able to reliably "walk the walk." Interactional expertise permits effective communication between contributory experts and others (e.g., laypeople), which in turn facilitates working jointly toward shared goals. Interactional expertise is attained through long-term immersion into the expert community in question. To assess interactional expertise, researchers developed the imitation game-a variant of the Turing test-to test whether a person, or a particular group, possesses interactional expertise of another. The imitation game, which has been used mainly in sociology to study the social nature of knowledge, may also be a useful tool for researchers who focus on cognitive aspects of expertise. In this paper, we introduce a modified version of the imitation game and apply it to examine interactional expertise in the context of blindness. Specifically, we examined blind and sighted individuals' ability to imitate each other in a street-crossing scenario. In Phase I, blind and sighted individuals provided verbal reports of their thought processes associated with crossing a street-once while imitating the other group (i.e., as a pretender) and once responding genuinely (i.e., as a non-pretender). In Phase II, transcriptions of the reports were judged as either genuine or imitated responses by a different set of blind and sighted participants, who also provided the reasoning for their decisions. The judges comprised blind individuals, sighted orientation-and-mobility specialists, and sighted individuals with infrequent socialization with blind individuals. Decision data were analyzed using probit mixed models for signal-detection-theory indices. Reasoning data were analyzed using natural-language-processing (NLP) techniques. The results revealed evidence that interactional expertise (i.e., relevant tacit knowledge) can be acquired by immersion in the group that possesses and produces the expert knowledge. The modified imitation game can be a useful research tool for measuring interactional expertise within a community of practice and evaluating practitioners' understanding of true experts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34777110
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730985
pmc: PMC8586539
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

730985

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Arsal, Suss, Ward, Ta, Ringer and Eccles.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

GA was employed by Envision Research Institute, Envision, Inc. PW was employed by the MITRE Corporation. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Hum Factors. 2000 Winter;42(4):636-59
pubmed: 11324856
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1741-62
pubmed: 23586704
Health (London). 2018 Nov;22(6):558-579
pubmed: 28770633
Br J Sociol. 2019 Sep;70(4):1561-1581
pubmed: 30351452

Auteurs

Güler Arsal (G)

Envision Research Institute, Envision, Inc., Wichita, KS, United States.

Joel Suss (J)

Department of Psychology, Fairmount College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, United States.

Paul Ward (P)

Social and Behavioral Sciences, The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA, United States.

Vivian Ta (V)

Department of Psychology, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, IL, United States.

Ryan Ringer (R)

Department of Psychology, Fairmount College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, United States.

David W Eccles (DW)

Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems, College of Education, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.

Classifications MeSH