Weekly Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Cetuximab as First-Line Treatment of Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma for Patients Ineligible to Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Monocentric Study in 60 Patients.

For most patients suffering from recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), chemotherapy is the main option after considering surgery and reirradiation. Cetuximab combined with a platinum-fluorouracil regimen (EXTREME) has been the standard of care for over a decade. Nevertheless, a significant number of patients remain unfit for this regimen because of age, severe comorbidities, or poor performance status. The aim of this study is to investigate an alternative regimen with sufficient efficacy and safety. We reviewed retrospectively the medical charts of all patients treated with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab (PCC) at our institution. Eligibility criteria were as follows: first-line R/M-HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx not suitable for local therapy, cisplatin, and/or 5-FU ineligibility, ECOG-PS: 0-2. PCC consisted of paclitaxel 80 mg/m We identified 60 consecutive patients treated with PCC between 2010 and 2016 at our institution. Thirty-one patients (52%) were ECOG-PS 2. Fifty-five patients (92%) were cisplatin ineligible. ORR was 43.3% (95% CI, 30.8-55.8), and disease control rate was 65% (95% CI, 52.9-77.1). With a median follow-up of 35.7 months (IQR 28.6-48.8), median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.5-7.2), and median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.5-14.8). For ECOG-PS 0-1 patients, median OS was 14.8 months (95% CI, 12.2-21.7) while it was only 7.5 months (95%CI: 5.5-12.7) for ECOG-PS 2 patients ( The weekly PCC regimen seems to be an interesting option in cisplatin-unfit patients. This study shows favorable PFS and OS when compared with what is achieved with the EXTREME regimen and a high controlled disease rate with predictable and manageable toxicities even in the more fragile population.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Carinato, Burgy, Ferry, Fischbach, Kalish, Guihard, Brahimi, Flesch, Bronner, Schultz, Frasie, Thiéry, Demarchi, Petit, Jung, Wagner, Coliat and Borel.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

CB is advisory board consultant for BMS and Astra Zeneca, and has received honoraria for consulting from Merck, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. MB has received honoraria for consulting from BMS, Ipsen and MSD. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.