Alternative splicing of NF-YA promotes prostate cancer aggressiveness and represents a new molecular marker for clinical stratification of patients.
Alternative splicing
Genome editing
NF-Y
Prostate cancer
Transcriptome profiling
Journal
Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR
ISSN: 1756-9966
Titre abrégé: J Exp Clin Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8308647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Nov 2021
15 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
25
06
2021
accepted:
02
11
2021
entrez:
16
11
2021
pubmed:
17
11
2021
medline:
26
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Approaches based on expression signatures of prostate cancer (PCa) have been proposed to predict patient outcomes and response to treatments. The transcription factor NF-Y participates to the progression from benign epithelium to both localized and metastatic PCa and is associated with aggressive transcriptional profile. The gene encoding for NF-YA, the DNA-binding subunit of NF-Y, produces two alternatively spliced transcripts, NF-YAs and NF-YAl. Bioinformatic analyses pointed at NF-YA splicing as a key transcriptional signature to discriminate between different tumor molecular subtypes. In this study, we aimed to determine the pathophysiological role of NF-YA splice variants in PCa and their association with aggressive subtypes. Data on the expression of NF-YA isoforms were extracted from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) database of tumor prostate tissues and validated in prostate cell lines. Lentiviral transduction and CRISPR-Cas9 technology allowed the modulation of the expression of NF-YA splice variants in PCa cells. We characterized 3D cell cultures through in vitro assays and RNA-seq profilings. We used the rank-rank hypergeometric overlap approach to identify concordant/discordant gene expression signatures of NF-YAs/NF-YAl-overexpressing cells and human PCa patients. We performed in vivo studies in SHO-SCID mice to determine pathological and molecular phenotypes of NF-YAs/NF-YAl xenograft tumors. NF-YA depletion affects the tumorigenic potential of PCa cells in vitro and in vivo. Elevated NF-YAs levels are associated to aggressive PCa specimens, defined by Gleason Score and TNM classification. NF-YAl overexpression increases cell motility, while NF-YAs enhances cell proliferation in PCa 3D spheroids and xenograft tumors. The transcriptome of NF-YAs-spheroids has an extensive overlap with localized and metastatic human PCa signatures. According to PCa PAM50 classification, NF-YAs transcript levels are higher in LumB, characterized by poor prognosis compared to LumA and basal subtypes. A significant decrease in NF-YAs/NF-YAl ratio distinguishes PCa circulating tumor cells from cancer cells in metastatic sites, consistently with pro-migratory function of NF-YAl. Stratification of patients based on NF-YAs expression is predictive of clinical outcome. Altogether, our results indicate that the modulation of NF-YA isoforms affects prostate pathophysiological processes and contributes to cancer-relevant phenotype, in vitro and in vivo. Evaluation of NF-YA splicing may represent a new molecular strategy for risk assessment of PCa patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Approaches based on expression signatures of prostate cancer (PCa) have been proposed to predict patient outcomes and response to treatments. The transcription factor NF-Y participates to the progression from benign epithelium to both localized and metastatic PCa and is associated with aggressive transcriptional profile. The gene encoding for NF-YA, the DNA-binding subunit of NF-Y, produces two alternatively spliced transcripts, NF-YAs and NF-YAl. Bioinformatic analyses pointed at NF-YA splicing as a key transcriptional signature to discriminate between different tumor molecular subtypes. In this study, we aimed to determine the pathophysiological role of NF-YA splice variants in PCa and their association with aggressive subtypes.
METHODS
METHODS
Data on the expression of NF-YA isoforms were extracted from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) database of tumor prostate tissues and validated in prostate cell lines. Lentiviral transduction and CRISPR-Cas9 technology allowed the modulation of the expression of NF-YA splice variants in PCa cells. We characterized 3D cell cultures through in vitro assays and RNA-seq profilings. We used the rank-rank hypergeometric overlap approach to identify concordant/discordant gene expression signatures of NF-YAs/NF-YAl-overexpressing cells and human PCa patients. We performed in vivo studies in SHO-SCID mice to determine pathological and molecular phenotypes of NF-YAs/NF-YAl xenograft tumors.
RESULTS
RESULTS
NF-YA depletion affects the tumorigenic potential of PCa cells in vitro and in vivo. Elevated NF-YAs levels are associated to aggressive PCa specimens, defined by Gleason Score and TNM classification. NF-YAl overexpression increases cell motility, while NF-YAs enhances cell proliferation in PCa 3D spheroids and xenograft tumors. The transcriptome of NF-YAs-spheroids has an extensive overlap with localized and metastatic human PCa signatures. According to PCa PAM50 classification, NF-YAs transcript levels are higher in LumB, characterized by poor prognosis compared to LumA and basal subtypes. A significant decrease in NF-YAs/NF-YAl ratio distinguishes PCa circulating tumor cells from cancer cells in metastatic sites, consistently with pro-migratory function of NF-YAl. Stratification of patients based on NF-YAs expression is predictive of clinical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Altogether, our results indicate that the modulation of NF-YA isoforms affects prostate pathophysiological processes and contributes to cancer-relevant phenotype, in vitro and in vivo. Evaluation of NF-YA splicing may represent a new molecular strategy for risk assessment of PCa patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34782004
doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02166-4
pii: 10.1186/s13046-021-02166-4
pmc: PMC8594157
doi:
Substances chimiques
CCAAT-Binding Factor
0
NFYA protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
362Subventions
Organisme : Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
ID : ID 21323
Organisme : Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
ID : ID 19543
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Br J Cancer. 2016 Jun 14;114(12):1334-42
pubmed: 27195424
Mol Cancer. 2019 Jan 18;18(1):12
pubmed: 30657059
BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):870
pubmed: 30176824
J Biol Chem. 2009 Dec 4;284(49):34189-200
pubmed: 19690168
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 19;7(29):45901-45915
pubmed: 27323853
Thyroid. 2021 Feb;31(2):247-263
pubmed: 32495722
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 9;8(1):15013
pubmed: 30302019
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Jun;38(6):675-678
pubmed: 32444850
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 16;7(1):13202
pubmed: 29038571
Science. 2015 Sep 18;349(6254):1351-6
pubmed: 26383955
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Dec 21;20(1):
pubmed: 30577600
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;840:81-5
pubmed: 22237525
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e103817
pubmed: 25119185
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 01;21(23):
pubmed: 33271832
Cells. 2020 Mar 20;9(3):
pubmed: 32244895
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Oct 11;10(10):
pubmed: 30314329
Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2018 May;1861(5):509-518
pubmed: 29505822
Nat Genet. 2007 Jan;39(1):41-51
pubmed: 17173048
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 12;12(6):
pubmed: 32545454
Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2017 May;1860(5):604-616
pubmed: 27939755
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013 Jun 24;20(4):R155-70
pubmed: 23580590
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Jul;14(7):2706-15
pubmed: 12857858
Stem Cells. 2012 Nov;30(11):2450-9
pubmed: 22969033
Oncogene. 2013 Aug 8;32(32):3655-63
pubmed: 23178496
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep;24(3):733-742
pubmed: 33531653
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 25;8(1):9588
pubmed: 29942049
BMC Med Genomics. 2010 Mar 16;3:8
pubmed: 20233430
Mol Cell. 2009 Dec 11;36(5):900-11
pubmed: 20005852
J Biol Chem. 1992 May 5;267(13):8984-90
pubmed: 1577736
Oncogenesis. 2019 Aug 16;8(9):44
pubmed: 31420533
Cell Rep. 2020 May 26;31(8):107669
pubmed: 32460015
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 31;8(5):7935-7945
pubmed: 27974701
Cancer Res. 2004 Sep 1;64(17):6190-9
pubmed: 15342404
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004 Jan 07;2:2
pubmed: 14711377
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 12;7(2):1633-50
pubmed: 26646448
Genes (Basel). 2020 Feb 14;11(2):
pubmed: 32075093
Nature. 2012 Jul 12;487(7406):239-43
pubmed: 22722839
Oncogene. 2019 Mar;38(11):1920-1935
pubmed: 30390074
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Apr;1863(4):673-85
pubmed: 26732297
Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 1;76(17):4948-58
pubmed: 27302169
Cell. 2018 Apr 5;173(2):400-416.e11
pubmed: 29625055
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Feb 4;108(2):295-308
pubmed: 33508235
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 14;12(1):6013
pubmed: 34650038
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 01;11(12):
pubmed: 31805710
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 15;25(8):2450-2457
pubmed: 30573691
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1663-1672
pubmed: 28494073
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 23;8(1):1733
pubmed: 29170510
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Apr;1859(4):627-38
pubmed: 26921500
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013 Mar 26;20(2):R49-64
pubmed: 23447570
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 01;9(7):
pubmed: 32630240
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 10;9(1):12955
pubmed: 31506469
Mol Cancer Res. 2006 Feb;4(2):79-92
pubmed: 16513839
Nat Cell Biol. 2013 Mar;15(3):274-83
pubmed: 23434823
Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5232-6
pubmed: 15289328
Asian J Androl. 2016 Jul-Aug;18(4):543-8
pubmed: 27080479
Genes (Basel). 2019 Nov 17;10(11):
pubmed: 31744190