Infigratinib in Early-Line and Salvage Therapy for FGFR3-Altered Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.


Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
received: 01 09 2021
revised: 06 10 2021
accepted: 08 10 2021
pubmed: 17 11 2021
medline: 30 4 2022
entrez: 16 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To describe the efficacy of infigratinib, a potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, across lines of therapy (LOT) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). Eligible patients had mUC and prior platinum-based chemotherapy, unless contraindicated, and activating FGFR3 mutation/fusion. Patients received infigratinib 125 mg orally daily (3 weeks on/1 week off) in a single-arm, open-label study. Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response (BOR) that included unconfirmed responses, and overall survival (OS) were also assessed. Subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes by LOT was performed. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; 13 (19.4%) received infigratinib as early-line therapy for mUC due to ineligibility to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall, ORR was 25.4% (95% CI 15.5-37.5) and DCR was 64.2% (95% CI 51.5-75.5). ORR was 30.8% (95% CI 9.1-61.4) with early-line infigratinib and 24.1% (95% CI 13.5-37.6) for ≥2 LOT. DCR was 46.2% (95% CI 19.2-74.9) for early-line and 68.5% (95% CI 54.4-80.5) for ≥2 LOT. PFS and OS appeared similar in both groups. Thirteen of 59 patients with a bladder primary tumor received early-line treatment with an ORR of 30.5% (95% CI 9.1-61.4), and 46 received ≥2 LOT with an ORR of 20.3% (95% CI 9.4-33.9); BOR was 38.5% (95% CI: 13.9-68.4%) and 42.6% (95% CI: 29.2-56.8%) in the early-line and salvage settings, respectively. Eight patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma received salvage therapy (ORR, 50.0%; DCR, 100.0%). No significant differences in toxicities between LOT were observed. Infigratinib has notable activity in patients with mUC regardless of LOT. The findings support the evaluation of infigratinib across different settings in mUC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34782263
pii: S1558-7673(21)00195-6
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.10.004
pmc: PMC9460895
mid: NIHMS1826959
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Phenylurea Compounds 0
Pyrimidines 0
Platinum 49DFR088MY
infigratinib A4055ME1VK
FGFR3 protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Clinical Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

35-42

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Références

Cancer Discov. 2018 Jul;8(7):812-821
pubmed: 29848605
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):312-322
pubmed: 28131785
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):338-348
pubmed: 31340094
Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):599-603
pubmed: 31272788
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1483-1492
pubmed: 28967485
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5634-9
pubmed: 19786668
Eur Urol. 2020 Dec;78(6):916-924
pubmed: 32847703
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Apr 1;17(4):367-402
pubmed: 30959471
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1454-1466
pubmed: 31405822
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Jul;4(7):563-8
pubmed: 27197067
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2117-2124
pubmed: 28375787
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 10;34(26):3119-25
pubmed: 27269937
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):748-757
pubmed: 29268948
Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;126(11):2597-2606
pubmed: 32208524
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 5;10(1):2977
pubmed: 31278255
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Sep;18(17):3068-77
pubmed: 11001674
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1015-1026
pubmed: 28212060
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Dec;17(12):1464-1472
pubmed: 31805526
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 10;37(29):2592-2600
pubmed: 31356140

Auteurs

Yung Lyou (Y)

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.

Jonathan E Rosenberg (JE)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Jean Hoffman-Censits (J)

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD.

David I Quinn (DI)

USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Daniel Petrylak (D)

Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, CT.

Matthew Galsky (M)

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Ulka Vaishampayan (U)

Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Ml.

Ugo De Giorgi (U)

lstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy.

Sumati Gupta (S)

Huntsman Cancer Institute - University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT.

Howard Burris (H)

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN.

Jessica Rearden (J)

QED Therapeutics, Inc., San Francisco, CA.

Ai Li (A)

QED Therapeutics, Inc., San Francisco, CA.

Cindy Xu (C)

QED Therapeutics, Inc., San Francisco, CA.

Corina Andresen (C)

QED Therapeutics, Inc., San Francisco, CA.

Susan Moran (S)

QED Therapeutics, Inc., San Francisco, CA.

Siamak Daneshmand (S)

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA.

Dean Bajorin (D)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Sumanta K Pal (SK)

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.

Petros Grivas (P)

University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: pgrivas@uw.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH