Combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with rare gynecological malignancies: results of the CA209-538 clinical trial.
CTLA-4 antigen
immunotherapy
programmed cell death 1 receptor
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
accepted:
31
08
2021
entrez:
16
11
2021
pubmed:
17
11
2021
medline:
12
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with rare cancers represent 55% of all gynecological malignancies and have poor survival outcomes due to limited treatment options. Combination immunotherapy with the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody nivolumab and the anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibody ipilimumab has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy across a range of common malignancies, justifying evaluation of this combination in rare gynecological cancers. This multicenter phase II study enrolled 43 patients with advanced rare gynecological cancers. Patients received induction treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively, every 3 weeks for four doses. Treatment was continued with nivolumab monotherapy at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with disease control at week 12 (complete response, partial response or stable disease (SD) by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumor V.1.1). Exploratory evaluations correlated clinical outcomes with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB). The objective response rate in the radiologically evaluable population was 36% (12/33 patients) and in the intention-to-treat population was 28% (12/43 patients), with additional 7 patients obtaining SD leading to a disease control rate of 58% and 44%, respectively. Durable responses were seen across a range of tumor histologies. Thirty-one (72%) patients experienced an immune-related adverse event (irAE) with a grade 3/4 irAE observed in seven (16%) patients. Response rate was higher among those patients with baseline PD-L1 expression (≥1% on tumor cells) but was independent of TMB. Ipilimumab and nivolumab combination treatment has significant clinical activity with a favorable safety profile across a range of advanced rare gynecological malignancies and warrants further investigation in these tumor types.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with rare cancers represent 55% of all gynecological malignancies and have poor survival outcomes due to limited treatment options. Combination immunotherapy with the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody nivolumab and the anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibody ipilimumab has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy across a range of common malignancies, justifying evaluation of this combination in rare gynecological cancers.
METHODS
This multicenter phase II study enrolled 43 patients with advanced rare gynecological cancers. Patients received induction treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively, every 3 weeks for four doses. Treatment was continued with nivolumab monotherapy at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with disease control at week 12 (complete response, partial response or stable disease (SD) by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumor V.1.1). Exploratory evaluations correlated clinical outcomes with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB).
RESULTS
The objective response rate in the radiologically evaluable population was 36% (12/33 patients) and in the intention-to-treat population was 28% (12/43 patients), with additional 7 patients obtaining SD leading to a disease control rate of 58% and 44%, respectively. Durable responses were seen across a range of tumor histologies. Thirty-one (72%) patients experienced an immune-related adverse event (irAE) with a grade 3/4 irAE observed in seven (16%) patients. Response rate was higher among those patients with baseline PD-L1 expression (≥1% on tumor cells) but was independent of TMB.
CONCLUSIONS
Ipilimumab and nivolumab combination treatment has significant clinical activity with a favorable safety profile across a range of advanced rare gynecological malignancies and warrants further investigation in these tumor types.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34782426
pii: jitc-2021-003156
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003156
pmc: PMC8593709
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ipilimumab
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JC reports honoraria/advisory board fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Novartis and MSD and speaker fees from Roche. OK reports speaker fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and MSD and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb. DK reports honoraria/advisory board fees from Novartis and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb. MC reports honoraria/advisory board fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Novartis, MSD, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Ideaya, Sanofi, Merck and Nektar. BM reports honoraria/advisory board fees from Novartis and Amgen.
Références
Cell. 2017 Feb 9;168(4):707-723
pubmed: 28187290
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;15(12):748-762
pubmed: 30361681
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 20;37(12):992-1000
pubmed: 30785829
Oncoimmunology. 2021 Apr 12;10(1):1908771
pubmed: 33889439
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):2981-2992
pubmed: 32167863
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1180-5
pubmed: 25713428
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1350-1355
pubmed: 29567705
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2825-2834
pubmed: 31487218
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1080-1087
pubmed: 31046082
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Oct;12(10):940-946
pubmed: 27858560
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;6(9):1405-1409
pubmed: 32729929
Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 19;5:5006
pubmed: 25233892
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Nov;47(17):2493-511
pubmed: 22033323
Genome Med. 2017 Apr 19;9(1):34
pubmed: 28420421
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;36(28):2836-2844
pubmed: 30110194
Cancer. 2017 Sep 1;123(17):3285-3290
pubmed: 28440953
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;38(16):1814-1823
pubmed: 32275468
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;38(1):1-10
pubmed: 31682550
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):773-779
pubmed: 29355075
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;26(17):4454-4459
pubmed: 32532787
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546
pubmed: 31562797
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;37(19):1608-1616
pubmed: 31100038
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;35(22):2535-2541
pubmed: 28489510
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1370-1385
pubmed: 31427204
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;5(8):1195-1204
pubmed: 31318407
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4015-22
pubmed: 26351349
Semin Cancer Biol. 2020 Apr;61:110-120
pubmed: 31622660