Clinician Perspectives on Using Computational Mental Health Insights From Patients' Social Media Activities: Design and Qualitative Evaluation of a Prototype.

information technology mental health social media

Journal

JMIR mental health
ISSN: 2368-7959
Titre abrégé: JMIR Ment Health
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101658926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 02 11 2020
accepted: 22 06 2021
revised: 11 02 2021
entrez: 16 11 2021
pubmed: 17 11 2021
medline: 17 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous studies have suggested that social media data, along with machine learning algorithms, can be used to generate computational mental health insights. These computational insights have the potential to support clinician-patient communication during psychotherapy consultations. However, how clinicians perceive and envision using computational insights during consultations has been underexplored. The aim of this study is to understand clinician perspectives regarding computational mental health insights from patients' social media activities. We focus on the opportunities and challenges of using these insights during psychotherapy consultations. We developed a prototype that can analyze consented patients' Facebook data and visually represent these computational insights. We incorporated the insights into existing clinician-facing assessment tools, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Global Functioning: Social Scale. The design intent is that a clinician will verbally interview a patient (eg, How was your mood in the past week?) while they reviewed relevant insights from the patient's social media activities (eg, number of depression-indicative posts). Using the prototype, we conducted interviews (n=15) and 3 focus groups (n=13) with mental health clinicians: psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers. The transcribed qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Clinicians reported that the prototype can support clinician-patient collaboration in agenda-setting, communicating symptoms, and navigating patients' verbal reports. They suggested potential use scenarios, such as reviewing the prototype before consultations and using the prototype when patients missed their consultations. They also speculated potential negative consequences: patients may feel like they are being monitored, which may yield negative effects, and the use of the prototype may increase the workload of clinicians, which is already difficult to manage. Finally, our participants expressed concerns regarding the prototype: they were unsure whether patients' social media accounts represented their actual behaviors; they wanted to learn how and when the machine learning algorithm can fail to meet their expectations of trust; and they were worried about situations where they could not properly respond to the insights, especially emergency situations outside of clinical settings. Our findings support the touted potential of computational mental health insights from patients' social media account data, especially in the context of psychotherapy consultations. However, sociotechnical issues, such as transparent algorithmic information and institutional support, should be addressed in future endeavors to design implementable and sustainable technology.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Previous studies have suggested that social media data, along with machine learning algorithms, can be used to generate computational mental health insights. These computational insights have the potential to support clinician-patient communication during psychotherapy consultations. However, how clinicians perceive and envision using computational insights during consultations has been underexplored.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to understand clinician perspectives regarding computational mental health insights from patients' social media activities. We focus on the opportunities and challenges of using these insights during psychotherapy consultations.
METHODS METHODS
We developed a prototype that can analyze consented patients' Facebook data and visually represent these computational insights. We incorporated the insights into existing clinician-facing assessment tools, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Global Functioning: Social Scale. The design intent is that a clinician will verbally interview a patient (eg, How was your mood in the past week?) while they reviewed relevant insights from the patient's social media activities (eg, number of depression-indicative posts). Using the prototype, we conducted interviews (n=15) and 3 focus groups (n=13) with mental health clinicians: psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers. The transcribed qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Clinicians reported that the prototype can support clinician-patient collaboration in agenda-setting, communicating symptoms, and navigating patients' verbal reports. They suggested potential use scenarios, such as reviewing the prototype before consultations and using the prototype when patients missed their consultations. They also speculated potential negative consequences: patients may feel like they are being monitored, which may yield negative effects, and the use of the prototype may increase the workload of clinicians, which is already difficult to manage. Finally, our participants expressed concerns regarding the prototype: they were unsure whether patients' social media accounts represented their actual behaviors; they wanted to learn how and when the machine learning algorithm can fail to meet their expectations of trust; and they were worried about situations where they could not properly respond to the insights, especially emergency situations outside of clinical settings.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our findings support the touted potential of computational mental health insights from patients' social media account data, especially in the context of psychotherapy consultations. However, sociotechnical issues, such as transparent algorithmic information and institutional support, should be addressed in future endeavors to design implementable and sustainable technology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34783667
pii: v8i11e25455
doi: 10.2196/25455
pmc: PMC8663497
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e25455

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23 MH120505
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH117172
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Dong Whi Yoo, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Bahador Saket, Domino Weir, Elizabeth Arenare, Asra F Ali, Anna R Van Meter, Michael L Birnbaum, Gregory D Abowd, Munmun De Choudhury. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 16.11.2021.

Références

J Psychiatr Pract. 2015 May;21(3):220-4
pubmed: 25955265
Explore (NY). 2009 Sep-Oct;5(5):277-89
pubmed: 19733814
Science. 2011 Sep 30;333(6051):1878-81
pubmed: 21960633
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Feb;23(1):398-413
pubmed: 22423178
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;163(10):1842
pubmed: 17012705
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 21;17(8):e203
pubmed: 26297627
Science. 1977 Apr 8;196(4286):129-36
pubmed: 847460
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 26;2:61
pubmed: 31388565
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jul 03;7:30
pubmed: 17608932
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Jan;205(1):4-8
pubmed: 28005647
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 12;21(7):e13218
pubmed: 31301127
Behav Ther. 2017 Mar;48(2):182-194
pubmed: 28270329
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;73(1):3-4
pubmed: 26676879
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jul 01;3(3):e30
pubmed: 27370327
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jan;66(1):206-19
pubmed: 8126650
NPJ Schizophr. 2019 Oct 7;5(1):17
pubmed: 31591400
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992 Apr;180(4):215-22; discussion 223-6
pubmed: 1556561
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Aug 29;3(3):e14329
pubmed: 31493326
J Affect Disord. 2016 Aug;200:111-8
pubmed: 27130960
IRB. 2007 Nov-Dec;29(6):1-6
pubmed: 18237078
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;11(4):290-295
pubmed: 25808317
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Jun 18;45(4):763-772
pubmed: 30351423
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:23-47
pubmed: 28375728
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Aug 12;7(8):e16969
pubmed: 32784180
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Aug 29;5(3):e56
pubmed: 30158102
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5802-5
pubmed: 23479631
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):372-4
pubmed: 20424071
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):855-62
pubmed: 25714163
J Psychiatr Pract. 2013 Nov;19(6):454-63
pubmed: 24241499
BMJ. 2015 Feb 19;350:h945
pubmed: 25697164
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2017 Jul/Aug;25(4):170-179
pubmed: 28504978
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):21-3
pubmed: 24497238
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975 Dec;43(6):867-71
pubmed: 1194481
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Oct;49(4):414-20
pubmed: 21939873
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2019 Jun 7;13:440-451
pubmed: 32280562
J Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(7):1271-82
pubmed: 25274717
Br J Clin Psychol. 1998 May;37(2):155-72
pubmed: 9631204
Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):721-3
pubmed: 19197046

Auteurs

Dong Whi Yoo (DW)

School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala (SK)

School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Bahador Saket (B)

School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Domino Weir (D)

School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Elizabeth Arenare (E)

The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, United States.

Asra F Ali (AF)

The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, United States.

Anna R Van Meter (AR)

The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, United States.
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, United States.
The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States.

Michael L Birnbaum (ML)

The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, United States.
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, United States.
The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States.

Gregory D Abowd (GD)

School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
College of Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.

Munmun De Choudhury (M)

School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Classifications MeSH