Carboplatin- and Etoposide-Loaded Lactoferrin Protein Nanoparticles for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Retinoblastoma In Vitro.
Antineoplastic Agents
/ pharmacokinetics
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
/ pharmacokinetics
Biological Availability
Carboplatin
/ pharmacokinetics
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Culture Media
Drug Carriers
/ chemistry
Drug Delivery Systems
Etoposide
/ pharmacokinetics
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Lactoferrin
/ chemistry
Microscopy, Confocal
Microscopy, Electron, Transmission
Nanoparticles
/ chemistry
Neoplastic Stem Cells
/ drug effects
Retinal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Retinoblastoma
/ drug therapy
Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
Journal
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
ISSN: 1552-5783
Titre abrégé: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703701
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2021
01 11 2021
Historique:
entrez:
16
11
2021
pubmed:
17
11
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are known to contribute to tumor relapses by virtue of their chemoresistance. With the knowledge that nanoformulations can overcome drug resistance, we evaluated the efficacy and cytotoxicity of clinical-grade carboplatin (CPT)- and etoposide (ETP)-loaded lactoferrin nanoparticles (Lf-Nps) on total, CD133-enriched (non-CSC), and CD133-depleted (CSC) populations of retinoblastoma (Rb) Y79 cells. Physicochemical properties of drug-loaded Lf-Nps were measured with transmission electron microscopy and attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared. The encapsulation efficiency, uptake, and release of drug-loaded Lf-Nps were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography and a UV-visible spectrophotometer. Cytotoxicity of the standard and drug-loaded Lf-Nps was evaluated by the MTT assay. The mean (SD) size and encapsulation efficiency of Lf-CPT and Lf-ETP were 61.2 (3.94) nm, 60% and 45.15 (5.85) nm, 38%, respectively, and the drug release efficiency was highest at pH 6. The increased drug uptake and lower release of drug-loaded Lf-Nps were observed in CSC and non-CSC populations compared to their standard forms. The relative increase of drug uptake and sustained intracellular retention of the drug-loaded Lf-Nps compared to standard drugs showed an enhanced cytotoxicity up to 50%, especially in Rb Y79 CSCs (IC50: CPT, 230.3; Lf-CPT, 118.2; ETP, 198.1; and Lf-ETP, 129) compared to non-CSCs. Our study documents an increase in drug uptake, retention, and cytotoxicity of Lf-CPT and Lf-ETP on Y79 CSCs and non-CSCs as compared to their standard drugs in vitro. The reversal of chemoresistance in the CSC population by nanoformulation appears promising with the potential to pave the way for improved targeted therapy and better clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34784412
pii: 2778081
doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.14.13
pmc: PMC8606840
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
0
Culture Media
0
Drug Carriers
0
Etoposide
6PLQ3CP4P3
Carboplatin
BG3F62OND5
Lactoferrin
EC 3.4.21.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Nature. 2012 Aug 23;488(7412):522-6
pubmed: 22854781
Cancer Nanotechnol. 2010;1(1-6):47-62
pubmed: 26069479
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32920
pubmed: 22470431
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44758
pubmed: 28303966
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2012 Apr;33(2):80-8
pubmed: 22988349
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;63(2):103-9
pubmed: 25827539
Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Oct;8(10):755-68
pubmed: 18784658
Mol Vis. 2012;18:2388-97
pubmed: 23049239
J Drug Target. 2019 Mar;27(3):257-269
pubmed: 29911902
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jan 18;8:1
pubmed: 28149278
Int J Biol Macromol. 2014 Sep;70:572-82
pubmed: 25088498
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2883-2891
pubmed: 31539297
Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2011 Jan 01;3(2):701-10
pubmed: 21196345
Clin Transl Med. 2013 Jan 17;2(1):3
pubmed: 23369605
Exp Eye Res. 2015 Oct;139:108-14
pubmed: 26213306
Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Apr;160:145-58
pubmed: 26899500
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;25(5):374-85
pubmed: 25014750
Stem Cells. 2009 Mar;27(3):498-508
pubmed: 19253934
Mol Vis. 2005 Sep 12;11:729-37
pubmed: 16179903
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Apr;5(4):275-84
pubmed: 15803154
Drug Deliv. 2008 Jun;15(5):277-87
pubmed: 18763158
Lancet. 2012 Apr 14;379(9824):1436-46
pubmed: 22414599
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2010 Dec 22;47 Online:e1-3
pubmed: 21175116
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018 Dec 10;4(12):3939-3961
pubmed: 33418796
Pharm Res. 2017 Feb;34(2):257-268
pubmed: 27928647
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;61(7):357-9
pubmed: 23548316
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;50(4):1506-14
pubmed: 19029022
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):779
pubmed: 29162051
Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2015 Aug;38(4):253-63
pubmed: 26063518
Semin Cancer Biol. 2010 Apr;20(2):77-84
pubmed: 20371287
Pharm Res. 2018 Jul 16;35(9):178
pubmed: 30014319
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;45(6):259-267
pubmed: 27800245
Drug Metab Rev. 2005;37(1):253-78
pubmed: 15747503
J Control Release. 1999 Feb 1;57(2):171-85
pubmed: 9971898
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 18;10(11):1655-1661
pubmed: 29181307
Mol Cell Oncol. 2014 Oct 30;2(1):e968067
pubmed: 27308385
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Nov;12(11):767-75
pubmed: 23051844
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov;121(11):1571-6
pubmed: 14609913