Associations between socioeconomic status and obesity, sarcopenia, and sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older adults: The Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort Study.


Journal

Experimental gerontology
ISSN: 1873-6815
Titre abrégé: Exp Gerontol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0047061

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 10 09 2021
revised: 08 11 2021
accepted: 10 11 2021
pubmed: 18 11 2021
medline: 4 3 2022
entrez: 17 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Social disadvantage may contribute to increased prevalence of sarcopenia and obesity. This study investigated if socioeconomic factors are associated with obesity, sarcopenia, or sarcopenic obesity (SO), in community-dwelling older adults. This was a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort study. Obesity was defined by body fat percentage (Men: ≥25%; Women: ≥35%) and sarcopenia was defined as the lowest 20% of sex-specific appendicular lean mass (ALM)/height (m 1099 older adults (63.0 ± 7.5 years; 51.1% women) participated. Older adults with a tertiary degree were significantly less likely to have obesity (0.68; 0.47, 0.98) and SO (0.48; 0.24, 0.94) compared with those who had no secondary schooling. No associations were found for occupation. Similarly, older adults living in advantaged areas were significantly less likely to have obesity (0.61; 0.39, 0.95). Steps per day mediated the association between residential area and body fat percentage by 51%. Lower educational attainment, but not occupation, was associated with increased likelihood for both obesity and SO in community-dwelling older adults. Low physical activity levels in disadvantaged areas substantially contributed to higher obesity prevalence in this population. Further research is necessary to confirm whether similar associations exist in populations with greater levels of social disadvantage and to design effective community-based interventions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Social disadvantage may contribute to increased prevalence of sarcopenia and obesity. This study investigated if socioeconomic factors are associated with obesity, sarcopenia, or sarcopenic obesity (SO), in community-dwelling older adults.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort study. Obesity was defined by body fat percentage (Men: ≥25%; Women: ≥35%) and sarcopenia was defined as the lowest 20% of sex-specific appendicular lean mass (ALM)/height (m
RESULTS
1099 older adults (63.0 ± 7.5 years; 51.1% women) participated. Older adults with a tertiary degree were significantly less likely to have obesity (0.68; 0.47, 0.98) and SO (0.48; 0.24, 0.94) compared with those who had no secondary schooling. No associations were found for occupation. Similarly, older adults living in advantaged areas were significantly less likely to have obesity (0.61; 0.39, 0.95). Steps per day mediated the association between residential area and body fat percentage by 51%.
CONCLUSION
Lower educational attainment, but not occupation, was associated with increased likelihood for both obesity and SO in community-dwelling older adults. Low physical activity levels in disadvantaged areas substantially contributed to higher obesity prevalence in this population. Further research is necessary to confirm whether similar associations exist in populations with greater levels of social disadvantage and to design effective community-based interventions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34785261
pii: S0531-5565(21)00409-5
doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111627
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111627

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Anoohya Gandham (A)

Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: anoohya.gandham@monash.edu.

Ayse Zengin (A)

Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Maxine P Bonham (MP)

Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.

Sharon L Brennan-Olsen (SL)

School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; Department of Medicine-Western Health, University of Melbourne, St Albans, Victoria, Australia; Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.

Dawn Aitken (D)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

Tania M Winzenberg (TM)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

Peter R Ebeling (PR)

Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Graeme Jones (G)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

David Scott (D)

Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; Australian Institute of Musculoskeletal Science, Melbourne Medical School - Western Campus, The University of Melbourne, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH