Portability of semantic and spatial-temporal machine learning methods to analyse social media for near-real-time disaster monitoring.

Disaster management Geospatial analysis Machine learning Semantic topic analysis Social media

Journal

Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands)
ISSN: 0921-030X
Titre abrégé: Nat Hazards (Dordr)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101632392

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 21 03 2020
accepted: 19 05 2021
entrez: 18 11 2021
pubmed: 19 11 2021
medline: 19 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Up-to-date information about an emergency is crucial for effective disaster management. However, severe restrictions impede the creation of spatiotemporal information by current remote sensing-based monitoring systems, especially at the beginning of a disaster. Multiple publications have shown promising results in complementing monitoring systems through spatiotemporal information extracted from social media data. However, various monitoring system criteria, such as near-real-time capabilities or applicability for different disaster types and use cases, have not yet been addressed. This paper presents an improved version of a recently proposed methodology to identify disaster-impacted areas (hot spots and cold spots) by combining semantic and geospatial machine learning methods. The process of identifying impacted areas is automated using semi-supervised topic models for various kinds of natural disasters. We validated the portability of our approach through experiments with multiple natural disasters and disaster types with differing characteristics, whereby one use case served to prove the near-real-time capability of our approach. We demonstrated the validity of the produced information by comparing the results with official authority datasets provided by the United States Geological Survey and the National Hurricane Centre. The validation shows that our approach produces reliable results that match the official authority datasets. Furthermore, the analysis result values are shown and compared to the outputs of the remote sensing-based Copernicus Emergency Management Service. The information derived from different sources can thus be considered to reliably detect disaster-impacted areas that were not detected by the Copernicus Emergency Management Service, particularly in densely populated cities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34789962
doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04808-4
pii: 4808
pmc: PMC8550645
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2939-2969

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestsThe authors declare no conflict of interests.

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101 Suppl 1:5228-35
pubmed: 14872004
Nature. 2016 Aug 30;537(7618):15-6
pubmed: 27582200
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Nov 29;17(12):
pubmed: 29186080

Auteurs

Clemens Havas (C)

Department of Geoinformatics, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Bernd Resch (B)

Department of Geoinformatics, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.

Classifications MeSH