Enhancing precision of the 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-16) using Rasch methodology.

Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly Rasch analysis measurement reliability subjective cognitive complaints

Journal

International psychogeriatrics
ISSN: 1741-203X
Titre abrégé: Int Psychogeriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007918

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
pubmed: 20 11 2021
medline: 20 11 2021
entrez: 19 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to investigate psychometric properties and enhance precision of the 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE-16) up to interval-level scale using Rasch methodology. Partial Credit Rasch model was applied to the IQCODE-16 scores using longitudinal data spanning 10 years of biennial follow-up. Community-dwelling older adults aged 70-90 years and their informants, living in Sydney, Australia, participated in the longitudinal Sydney Memory and Ageing Study (MAS). The sample included 400 participants of the MAS aged 70 years and older, 109 out of those were diagnosed with dementia 10 years after the baseline assessment. The IQCODE-16. Initial analysis indicated excellent reliability of the IQCODE-16, Person Separation Index (PSI) = 0.92, but there were four misfitting items and local dependency issues. Combining locally dependent items into four super-items resulted in the best Rasch model fit with no misfitting or locally dependent items, strict unidimensionality, strong reliability, and invariance across person factors such as participants' diagnosis and relationship to their informants, as well as informants' age and sex. This permitted the generation of conversion algorithms to transform ordinal scores into interval data to enhance precision of measurement. The IQCODE-16 demonstrated strong reliability and satisfied expectations of the unidimensional Rasch model after minor modifications. Ordinal-to-interval transformation tables published here can be used to increase accuracy of the IQCODE-16 without altering its current format. These findings could contribute to enhancement of precision in assessing clinical conditions such as cognitive decline in older people.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34794521
pii: S1041610221002568
doi: 10.1017/S1041610221002568
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

166-176

Auteurs

Quoc Cuong Truong (QC)

School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Faculty of Psychology, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Carol Choo (C)

College of Healthcare Sciences, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia.

Katya Numbers (K)

Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Alexander G Merkin (AG)

National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Centre for Precise Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Kaufbeuren, Germany.

Perminder S Sachdev (PS)

Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Valery L Feigin (VL)

National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Henry Brodaty (H)

Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Nicole A Kochan (NA)

Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Oleg N Medvedev (ON)

School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Classifications MeSH