Association of the Careggi Collateral Score with 3-month modified Rankin Scale score after thrombectomy for stroke with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery.


Journal

Journal of neurology
ISSN: 1432-1459
Titre abrégé: J Neurol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0423161

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 25 06 2021
accepted: 08 11 2021
revised: 07 11 2021
pubmed: 20 11 2021
medline: 27 1 2022
entrez: 19 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Careggi Collateral Score (CCS) (qualitative-quantitative evaluation) was developed from a single-centre cohort as an angiographic score to describe both the extension and effectiveness of the pial collateral circulation in stroke patients with occlusion of the anterior circulation. We aimed to examine the association between CCS (quantitative evaluation) and 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in a large multi-center cohort of patients receiving thrombectomy for stroke with occlusion of middle cerebral artery (MCA). We conducted a study on prospectively collected data from 1284 patients enrolled in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke. According to the extension of the retrograde reperfusion in the cortical anterior cerebral artery (ACA)-MCA territories, CCS ranges from 0 (absence of retrograde filling) to 4 (visualization of collaterals until the alar segment of the MCA). Using CCS of 4 as reference, CCS grades were associated in the direction of unfavourable outcome on 3-month mRS shift (0 to 6); significant difference was found between CCS of 0 and CCS of 1 and between CCS of 3 and CCS of 4. CCS ≥ 3 was the optimal cut-off for predicting 3-month excellent outcome, while CCS ≥ 1 was the optimal cut-off for predicting 3-month survival. CCS of 0 and CCS < 3 were associated in the direction of unfavourable recanalization on TICI shift (0 to 3) compared with CCS ≥ 1 and CCS ≥ 3, respectively. Compared with CCS ≥ 3 as reference, CCS of 0 and CCS 1 to 2 were associated in the direction of unfavourable recanalization on TICI shift. There was no evidence of heterogeneity of effects of successful recanalization and procedure time ≤ 60 min on 3-month mRS shift across CCS categories. The CCS could provide a future advantage for improving the prognosis in patients receiving thrombectomy for stroke with M1 or M1-M2 segment of the MCA occlusion.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Careggi Collateral Score (CCS) (qualitative-quantitative evaluation) was developed from a single-centre cohort as an angiographic score to describe both the extension and effectiveness of the pial collateral circulation in stroke patients with occlusion of the anterior circulation. We aimed to examine the association between CCS (quantitative evaluation) and 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in a large multi-center cohort of patients receiving thrombectomy for stroke with occlusion of middle cerebral artery (MCA).
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a study on prospectively collected data from 1284 patients enrolled in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke. According to the extension of the retrograde reperfusion in the cortical anterior cerebral artery (ACA)-MCA territories, CCS ranges from 0 (absence of retrograde filling) to 4 (visualization of collaterals until the alar segment of the MCA).
RESULTS RESULTS
Using CCS of 4 as reference, CCS grades were associated in the direction of unfavourable outcome on 3-month mRS shift (0 to 6); significant difference was found between CCS of 0 and CCS of 1 and between CCS of 3 and CCS of 4. CCS ≥ 3 was the optimal cut-off for predicting 3-month excellent outcome, while CCS ≥ 1 was the optimal cut-off for predicting 3-month survival. CCS of 0 and CCS < 3 were associated in the direction of unfavourable recanalization on TICI shift (0 to 3) compared with CCS ≥ 1 and CCS ≥ 3, respectively. Compared with CCS ≥ 3 as reference, CCS of 0 and CCS 1 to 2 were associated in the direction of unfavourable recanalization on TICI shift. There was no evidence of heterogeneity of effects of successful recanalization and procedure time ≤ 60 min on 3-month mRS shift across CCS categories.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The CCS could provide a future advantage for improving the prognosis in patients receiving thrombectomy for stroke with M1 or M1-M2 segment of the MCA occlusion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34797435
doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10898-8
pii: 10.1007/s00415-021-10898-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1013-1023

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Références

Liebeskind DS (2003) Collateral circulation. Stroke 34:2279–2284
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000086465.41263.06
Lima FO, Furie KL, Silva GS et al (2010) The pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography is a strong predictor of long-term functional outcome in stroke patients with large vessel intracranial occlusion. Stroke 41:2316–2322
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592303
Maas MB, Lev MH, Ay H et al (2009) Collateral vessels on CT angiography predict outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 40:3001–3005
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.552513
Menon BK, O’Brien B, Bivard A et al (2013) Assessment of leptomeningeal collaterals using dynamic CT angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 33:365–371
doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.171
Menon BK, Smith EE, Modi J et al (2011) Regional leptomeningeal score on CT angiography predicts clinical and imaging outcomes in patients with acute anterior circulation occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1640–1645
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2564
Berkhemer OA, Jansen IG, Beumer D et al (2016) Collateral status on baseline computed tomographic angiography and intra-arterial treatment effect in patients with proximal anterior circulation stroke. Stroke 47:768–776
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011788
Boers AM, Jansen IG, Berkhemer OA et al (2017) Collateral status and tissue outcome after intra-arterial therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37:3589–3598
doi: 10.1177/0271678X16678874
Menon BK, Qazi E, Nambiar V et al (2015) Differential effect of baseline computer tomographic angiography collaterals on clinical outcome in patients enrolled in the interventional management of stroke III trial. Stroke 46:1239–1244
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009009
Jansen IG, Mulder MJ, Goldhoorn RJB et al (2019) Impact of single phase CT angiography collateral status on functional outcome over time: results from the MR CLEAN Registry. J Neurointerv Surg 11:866–873
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014619
Gensicke H, Al-Ajlan F, Campbell B et al (2017) Comparing the impact of baseline collateral status assessed by different collateral scores and different imaging modalities on outcomes in acute ischemic patients: a meta-analysis from the HERMES collaboration. In: 3rd Eur Stroke Organ Conf 16–18th May 2017
Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H et al (2003) Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 34:e109–e137
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082720.85129.0A
Singer OC, Berkefeld J, Nolte CH et al (2015) Collateral vessels in proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion: the ENDOSTROKE study. Radiology 274:851–858
doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140951
Anadani M, Finitsis S, Clarençon F et al (2021) Collateral status reperfusion and outcomes after endovascular therapy: insight from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry. J Neurointerv Surg. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017553
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017553 pubmed: 34140288 pmcid: 8606438
Mangiafico S, Consoli A, Renieri L et al (2013) Semi-quantitative and qualitative evaluation of pial leptomeningeal collateral circulation in acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation: the Careggi Collateral Score. Ital J Anat Embryol 118:277–287
pubmed: 24640591
Mangiafico M, Saia V, Nencini P et al (2014) Effect of the interaction between recanalization and collateral circulation on functional outcome in acute ischaemic stroke. Interv Neuroradiol 20:704–714
doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10069
Consoli A, Andersson T, Holmberg A et al (2016) CT perfusion and angiographic assessment of pial collateral reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke: the CAPRI study. J Neurointerv Surg 8:1211–1216
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012155
Bang OY, Goyal M, Liebeskind DS (2015) Collateral circulation in ischemic stroke: assessment tools and therapeutic strategies. Stroke 46:3302–3309
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010508
Vagal A, Aviv R, Sucharew H et al (2018) Collateral clock is more important than time clock for tissue fate. Stroke 49:2102–2107
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021484

Auteurs

Manuel Cappellari (M)

Stroke Unit, DAI di Neuroscienze, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy. manuel_cappellari@libero.it.

Valentina Saia (V)

Neurology and Stroke Unit, S. Corona Hospital, Pietra Ligure, Italy.

Giovanni Pracucci (G)

Department of NEUROFARBA, Neuroscience Section, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Fainardi Enrico (F)

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Sperimentali e Cliniche, Neuroradiologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Ospedale Universitario Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Arturo Consoli (A)

Service de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Interventional Neurovascular Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Sergio Nappini (S)

Interventional Neurovascular Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Lucio Castellan (L)

Department of Neuroradiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

Sandra Bracco (S)

Unit of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Mauro Bergui (M)

Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza-Molinette, Turin, Italy.

Mirco Cosottini (M)

Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Alessandra Briatico Vangosa (AB)

Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit-"SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy.

Sergio Vinci (S)

UOC Neuroradiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphologic and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Maria Ruggiero (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.

Edoardo Puglielli (E)

Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Ospedale Civile Mazzini, Teramo, Italy.

Luigi Chiumarulo (L)

UOS Neuroradiologia Interventistica, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy.

Giacomo Cester (G)

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Neuroradiology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.

Chiara Comelli (C)

Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.

Umberto Silvagni (U)

Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy.

Daniele Morosetti (D)

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Valentina Caldiera (V)

Department of Neuroradiology, S. Corona Hospital, Pietra Ligure, Italy.

Nicola Cavasin (N)

Neuroradiology Unit, Ospedale dell'Angelo, USSL3 Serenissima, Mestre, Italy.

Valeria Ledda (V)

Vascular and Interventional Neuroradiology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy.

Giuseppina Sanfilippo (G)

Radiologia e Neuroradiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.

Andrea Saletti (A)

Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital Arcispedale S. Anna, Ferrara, Italy.

Pietro Filauri (P)

Neuroradiology Unit, Presidio Ospedaliero SS. Filippo e Nicola, Avezzano, Italy.

Ivan Gallesio (I)

Neuroradiological Unit, Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera "SS Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo", Alessandria, Italy.

Nunzio Paolo Nuzzi (NP)

Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy.

Pitero Amistá (P)

Neuroradiology Unit, Ospedale S. Maria Misericordia, Rovigo, Italy.

Cecilia Zivelonghi (C)

Stroke Unit, DAI di Neuroscienze, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Mauro Plebani (M)

Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.

Marco Pavia (M)

Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.

Daniele Romano (D)

UOC Neuroradiologia, AUO S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.

Francesco Biraschi (F)

Department of Human Neurosciences, Interventional Neuroradiology, Università degli Studi di Roma Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

Roberto Menozzi (R)

Neuroradiology Unit, Ospedale Universitario, Parma, Italy.

Roberto Gasparotti (R)

Neuroradiology Unit, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

Andrea Giorgianni (A)

Neuroradiology Department, Ospedale di Circolo-ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.

Andrea Zini (A)

Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Domenico Inzitari (D)

Department of NEUROFARBA, Neuroscience Section, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Danilo Toni (D)

Emergency Department Stroke Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Salvatore Mangiafico (S)

Interventional Neurovascular Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH