Integration of pre-exposure prophylaxis services into public HIV care clinics in Kenya: a pragmatic stepped-wedge randomised trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Global health
ISSN: 2214-109X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
30
10
2020
revised:
29
07
2021
accepted:
11
08
2021
pubmed:
20
11
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
19
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Successful and sustainable models for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery in public health systems in Africa are needed. We aimed to evaluate the implementation of PrEP delivery integrated in public HIV care clinics in Kenya. As part of Kenya's national PrEP roll-out, we conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised pragmatic trial to catalyse scale-up of PrEP delivery integrated in 25 public HIV care clinics. We selected high-volume clinics in these regions (ie, those with a high number of people living with HIV enrolled in HIV care and treatment). Clinics (each representing a cluster) were stratified by region and randomly assigned to the order in which clinic staff would receive PrEP training and ongoing technical support using numbered opaque balls picked from a bag. There was no masking. PrEP provision was done by clinic staff without additional financial support. Data were abstracted from records of individuals initiating PrEP. The primary outcome was the number of people initiating PrEP per clinic per month comparing intervention to control periods. Other outcomes included PrEP continuation, adherence, and incident HIV infections. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052010. After the baseline period, which started in January, 2017, every month two to six HIV care clinics crossed over from control to intervention, until August, 2017, when all clinics were implementing the intervention. Of 4898 individuals initiating PrEP (27 during the control period and 4871 during the intervention period), 2640 (54%) were women, the median age was 31 years (IQR 25-39), and 4092 (84%) reported having a partner living with HIV. The mean monthly number of PrEP initiations per clinic was 0·1 (SD 0·5) before the intervention and 7·5 (2·7) after intervention introduction (rate ratio 23·7, 95% CI 14·2-39·5, p<0·0001). PrEP continuation was 57% at 1 month, 44% at 3 months, and 34% at 6 months, and 12% of those who missed a refill returned later for PrEP re-initiation. Tenofovir diphosphate was detected in 68 (96%) of 71 blood samples collected from a randomly selected subset of participants. Six HIV infections were observed over 2531 person-years of observation (incidence 0·24 cases per 100 person-years), three of which occurred at the first visit after PrEP initiation. We observed high uptake, reasonable continuation with high adherence, frequent PrEP restarts, and low HIV incidence. Integration of PrEP services within public HIV care clinics in Africa is feasible. National Institute of Mental Health and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Successful and sustainable models for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery in public health systems in Africa are needed. We aimed to evaluate the implementation of PrEP delivery integrated in public HIV care clinics in Kenya.
METHODS
As part of Kenya's national PrEP roll-out, we conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised pragmatic trial to catalyse scale-up of PrEP delivery integrated in 25 public HIV care clinics. We selected high-volume clinics in these regions (ie, those with a high number of people living with HIV enrolled in HIV care and treatment). Clinics (each representing a cluster) were stratified by region and randomly assigned to the order in which clinic staff would receive PrEP training and ongoing technical support using numbered opaque balls picked from a bag. There was no masking. PrEP provision was done by clinic staff without additional financial support. Data were abstracted from records of individuals initiating PrEP. The primary outcome was the number of people initiating PrEP per clinic per month comparing intervention to control periods. Other outcomes included PrEP continuation, adherence, and incident HIV infections. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052010.
FINDINGS
After the baseline period, which started in January, 2017, every month two to six HIV care clinics crossed over from control to intervention, until August, 2017, when all clinics were implementing the intervention. Of 4898 individuals initiating PrEP (27 during the control period and 4871 during the intervention period), 2640 (54%) were women, the median age was 31 years (IQR 25-39), and 4092 (84%) reported having a partner living with HIV. The mean monthly number of PrEP initiations per clinic was 0·1 (SD 0·5) before the intervention and 7·5 (2·7) after intervention introduction (rate ratio 23·7, 95% CI 14·2-39·5, p<0·0001). PrEP continuation was 57% at 1 month, 44% at 3 months, and 34% at 6 months, and 12% of those who missed a refill returned later for PrEP re-initiation. Tenofovir diphosphate was detected in 68 (96%) of 71 blood samples collected from a randomly selected subset of participants. Six HIV infections were observed over 2531 person-years of observation (incidence 0·24 cases per 100 person-years), three of which occurred at the first visit after PrEP initiation.
INTERPRETATION
We observed high uptake, reasonable continuation with high adherence, frequent PrEP restarts, and low HIV incidence. Integration of PrEP services within public HIV care clinics in Africa is feasible.
FUNDING
National Institute of Mental Health and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34798031
pii: S2214-109X(21)00391-0
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00391-0
pmc: PMC8609282
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Tenofovir
99YXE507IL
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03052010']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1730-e1739Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI027757
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests JMB reports personal fees from Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016 Jan;11(1):80-6
pubmed: 26575147
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016 Apr 15;122:16-20
pubmed: 26829517
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Dec 21;62(1):
pubmed: 29038282
PLoS Med. 2018 Aug 13;15(8):e1002636
pubmed: 30102693
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016 Jan;11(1):35-40
pubmed: 26545265
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Jul;22 Suppl 3:e25303
pubmed: 31321911
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Feb 1;77(2):119-127
pubmed: 29084044
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019 Apr;16(2):141-150
pubmed: 30796608
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 4;13(1):118
pubmed: 30180860
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):655-664
pubmed: 32405065
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012 Nov;7(6):593-9
pubmed: 23032736
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):399-410
pubmed: 22784037
Sex Health. 2018 Nov;15(6):522-527
pubmed: 30476461
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 May 1;87(1):e150-e158
pubmed: 33492024
AIDS Behav. 2014 Sep;18(9):1712-21
pubmed: 24965676
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 23;13(8):e1002099
pubmed: 27552090
Glob Public Health. 2019 Oct;14(10):1524-1534
pubmed: 30871413
AIDS. 2016 Jul 31;30(12):1973-83
pubmed: 27149090
AIDS. 2015 Jul 17;29(11):1277-85
pubmed: 26103095
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Mar 1;62(3):339-47
pubmed: 23187945
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):129-35
pubmed: 25887561
Sex Health. 2018 Nov;15(6):578-586
pubmed: 30408432
Lancet HIV. 2020 Apr;7(4):e249-e261
pubmed: 32087152