Effectiveness and tolerability of radiotherapy for patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a monocenter analysis.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
/ radiotherapy
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ pathology
Prognosis
Progression-Free Survival
Proportional Hazards Models
Radiotherapy
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 11 2021
19 11 2021
Historique:
received:
01
04
2021
accepted:
26
10
2021
entrez:
20
11
2021
pubmed:
21
11
2021
medline:
8
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To analyze the effectiveness and toxicities of radiotherapy in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) patients treated in our institution. Patients with iNHL treated with radiotherapy between 1999 and 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. PFS, LC, and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to investigate the differences between subgroups. Cox proportional hazard model was used for univariate continuous analysis. Seventy-five patients were identified in our institutional database between 1999 and 2016. Fifty-eight (77.3%) had stage I after Ann-Arbor and 17 patients (22.7%) had stage II. The median follow-up was 87 months (95% CI 72-102 months). Median single dose per fraction was 2.0 Gy (range 1.5-2 Gy) and median total dose was 30.6 Gy (range 16-45 Gy). Radiotherapy was performed in 2D (n = 10; 13.3%), 3D (n = 63; 84.0%) and VMAT (n = 2; 2.7%) techniques, respectively. The median PFS was 14.0 years (95% CI 8.3-19.7 years). The estimated PFS after 5 and 10 years were 73.0% and 65.5% in Kaplan-Meier analysis, respectively. The 5- and 10-year LC were 94.9% and 92.3%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS were 88.6% and 73.9%. In univariate analyses of PFS, younger patients (≤ 60 years old) had significantly superior PFS to those older than 60 years old (5-year PFS 81.9% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.021). Dose escalation > 36.0 Gy had no prognostic influence in term of PFS (p = 0.425). Extranodal involvement, stage and histology had no prognostic impact on PFS. Depending on the site of lymphomas, the most common acute side effects were: dermatitis CTCAE° I-II (8.0%), xerostomia CTC° I (8.0%), cataract CTC° I (12.0%) and dry eyes CTC° I-II (14.6%). No adverse event CTC° III was reported. Most acute side effects recovered at 3 to 6 months after radiotherapy except for CTC° I cataract and xerostomia. Local Radiotherapy was highly effective for treatment of early stage iNHL with no serious side effects in our cohort. The most acute CTCAE° I-II side effects recovered 3 to 6 months later. Technique advances seem to have further improved effectiveness and tolerability of radiotherapy.Trial registration: Local ethics committee of Ludwig-Maximilian-University (LMU) Munich approved this retrospective analysis on the May 7th, 2019 (Nr. 19-137).
Identifiants
pubmed: 34799601
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01851-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-01851-w
pmc: PMC8604980
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22586Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Aug 31;15(1):210
pubmed: 32867796
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;36(25):2593-2602
pubmed: 29975624
Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3797-806
pubmed: 20564082
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Apr 15;22(8):1454-9
pubmed: 15024027
Ann Oncol. 2021 Mar;32(3):298-308
pubmed: 33249059
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 15;94(4):783-91
pubmed: 26972651
Hematol Oncol. 2018 Dec;36(5):723-732
pubmed: 30146794
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):17-29
pubmed: 31912792
Radiat Oncol J. 2015 Dec;33(4):310-9
pubmed: 26756031
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Mar 1;64(3):928-34
pubmed: 16243446
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):153-71
pubmed: 26773441
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):457-63
pubmed: 24572077
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 20;30(27):3368-75
pubmed: 22915662
Hemasphere. 2018 Nov 30;2(6):e160
pubmed: 31723798
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Aug;196(8):705-714
pubmed: 32377821
BMC Cancer. 2011 Feb 26;11:87
pubmed: 21352561
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 1;21(13):2474-80
pubmed: 12829665
Br J Cancer. 1994 Jun;69(6):1088-93
pubmed: 8198975
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jun 24;7:103
pubmed: 22726938
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):522-529
pubmed: 30858143
Cancer. 2015 Sep 15;121(18):3325-34
pubmed: 26042364
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jan 02;8:2
pubmed: 23281682
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v83-v90
pubmed: 27664263
Blood. 2019 Jan 17;133(3):237-245
pubmed: 30446493
Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 May;185(5):288-95
pubmed: 19440667
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jul;100(1):86-92
pubmed: 21664710
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):110
pubmed: 27577712
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Dec 1;51(5):1219-27
pubmed: 11728680
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1282-90
pubmed: 8648385
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 10;36(29):2918-2925
pubmed: 29975623