Comparison of Whiskbroom and Pushbroom darkfield elastic light scattering spectroscopic imaging for head and neck cancer identification in a mouse model.
Chemometrics/statistics
Clinical/biomedical analysis
Head and neck cancer
Microspectroscopy
Mie elastic light scattering spectroscopy
Mouse tumor model
Journal
Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
ISSN: 1618-2650
Titre abrégé: Anal Bioanal Chem
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101134327
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
08
06
2021
accepted:
08
10
2021
revised:
30
08
2021
pubmed:
21
11
2021
medline:
17
2
2022
entrez:
20
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The early detection of head and neck cancer is a prolonged challenging task. It requires a precise and accurate identification of tissue alterations as well as a distinct discrimination of cancerous from healthy tissue areas. A novel approach for this purpose uses microspectroscopic techniques with special focus on hyperspectral imaging (HSI) methods. Our proof-of-principle study presents the implementation and application of darkfield elastic light scattering spectroscopy (DF ELSS) as a non-destructive, high-resolution, and fast imaging modality to distinguish lingual healthy from altered tissue regions in a mouse model. The main aspect of our study deals with the comparison of two varying HSI detection principles, which are a point-by-point and line scanning imaging, and whether one might be more appropriate in differentiating several tissue types. Statistical models are formed by deploying a principal component analysis (PCA) with the Bayesian discriminant analysis (DA) on the elastic light scattering (ELS) spectra. Overall accuracy, sensitivity, and precision values of 98% are achieved for both models whereas the overall specificity results in 99%. An additional classification of model-unknown ELS spectra is performed. The predictions are verified with histopathological evaluations of identical HE-stained tissue areas to prove the model's capability of tissue distinction. In the context of our proof-of-principle study, we assess the Pushbroom PCA-DA model to be more suitable for tissue type differentiations and thus tissue classification. In addition to the HE-examination in head and neck cancer diagnosis, the usage of HSI-based statistical models might be conceivable in a daily clinical routine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34799750
doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03726-5
pii: 10.1007/s00216-021-03726-5
pmc: PMC8626402
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7363-7383Subventions
Organisme : MWK Baden-Württemberg
ID : Doctoral program of the University of Tübingen an
Organisme : Barts Charity Lectureship
ID : MGU045
Organisme : Projekt DEAL for Open Access Publication
ID : 3399 (Reutlingen university)
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Appl Opt. 1998 May 1;37(13):2788-97
pubmed: 18273225
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Aug;22(8):1-7
pubmed: 28849631
G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Oct 27;4(12):2483-92
pubmed: 25352541
J Biomed Opt. 2000 Apr;5(2):221-8
pubmed: 10938787
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Apr 10;56(16):4392-4430
pubmed: 27862751
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;23(18):5426-5436
pubmed: 28611203
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 24;9(1):3437
pubmed: 30143634
Odontol Revy. 1973;24(1):39-48
pubmed: 4514062
Nat Protoc. 2014 Aug;9(8):1771-91
pubmed: 24992094
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Nov;409(28):6613-6623
pubmed: 28918486
Dis Markers. 2008;25(6):303-12
pubmed: 19208948
Nature. 2000 Jul 6;406(6791):35-6
pubmed: 10894529
Science. 1982 Sep 10;217(4564):998-1003
pubmed: 7112116
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2018 Jan-Feb;10469:
pubmed: 30197462
J Biomed Opt. 2008 Mar-Apr;13(2):024015
pubmed: 18465978
Dev Cell. 2010 Jun 15;18(6):884-901
pubmed: 20627072
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jun;7(3):235-40
pubmed: 18473495
Cell Death Dis. 2019 Jul 15;10(8):540
pubmed: 31308358
Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(9):1055-1072
pubmed: 28545365
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Jan;1805(1):105-17
pubmed: 19931353
J Phys Chem B. 2006 Apr 13;110(14):7238-48
pubmed: 16599493
Cancers (Basel). 2019 May 30;11(6):
pubmed: 31151223
Laryngoscope. 1996 Sep;106(9 Pt 1):1170-5
pubmed: 8822725
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953
pubmed: 30350310
Cancer Sci. 2011 Apr;102(4):852-7
pubmed: 21205093
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007 Dec;26(3-4):645-62
pubmed: 17768600
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 9;11(1):5671
pubmed: 33168804
J Biomed Opt. 2013 Oct;18(10):100901
pubmed: 24114019
J Biophotonics. 2020 Feb;13(2):e201900183
pubmed: 31566889
J Biomed Opt. 2019 Jan;24(1):1-9
pubmed: 30701726
Virchows Arch. 2018 Mar;472(3):311-313
pubmed: 29450648
Biopolymers. 2005 Apr 5;77(5):264-72
pubmed: 15657894
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017 Nov;11(11):3253-3262
pubmed: 27860386
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Mar;50(2):132-6
pubmed: 21232835
Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1681-92
pubmed: 12655525
Laryngoscope. 1998 Apr;108(4 Pt 1):471-5
pubmed: 9546254
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jan 1;10(1 Pt 1):301-13
pubmed: 14734483
Oral Oncol. 2005 Apr;41(4):337-9
pubmed: 15792604
Gastroenterology. 2004 Apr;126(4):1071-81; discussion 948
pubmed: 15057746
Opt Express. 2010 Feb 1;18(3):3116-27
pubmed: 20174146
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593