Experimental Chlamydia gallinacea infection in chickens does not protect against a subsequent experimental Chlamydia psittaci infection.


Journal

Veterinary research
ISSN: 1297-9716
Titre abrégé: Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9309551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 08 07 2021
accepted: 21 10 2021
entrez: 21 11 2021
pubmed: 22 11 2021
medline: 28 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Chlamydia psittaci was considered the predominant chlamydial species in poultry until Chlamydia gallinacea was discovered in 2009. C. psittaci is a zoonotic obligate intracellular bacterium reported in more than 465 bird species including poultry. In poultry, infections can result in asymptomatic disease, but also in more severe systemic illness. The zoonotic potential of C. gallinacea has yet to be proven. Infections in poultry appear to be asymptomatic and in recent prevalence studies C. gallinacea was the main chlamydial species found in chickens. The high prevalence of C. gallinacea resulted in the question if an infection with C. gallinacea might protect against an infection with C. psittaci. To investigate possible cross protection, chickens were inoculated with C. gallinacea NL_G47 and subsequently inoculated with either a different strain of C. gallinacea (NL_F725) or C. psittaci. Chickens that had not been pre-inoculated with C. gallinacea NL_G47 were used as a C. gallinacea or C. psittaci infection control. In the groups that were inoculated with C. psittaci, no difference in pharyngeal or cloacal shedding, or in tissue dissemination was observed between the control group and the pre-inoculated group. In the groups inoculated with C. gallinacea NL_F725, shedding in cloacal swabs and tissues dissemination was lower in the group pre-inoculated with C. gallinacea NL_G47. These results indicate previous exposure to C. gallinacea does not protect against an infection with C. psittaci, but might protect against a new infection of C. gallinacea.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34801064
doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-01011-y
pii: 10.1186/s13567-021-01011-y
pmc: PMC8605536
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

141

Subventions

Organisme : ministry of agriculture, nature and food quality (nl)
ID : WOT-01-002-005.02
Organisme : ministry of agriculture, nature and food quality (nl)
ID : WOT-01-01-002-005.13
Organisme : ministry of agriculture, nature and food quality (nl)
ID : KB-21-006-022

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Vet Microbiol. 2009 Mar 16;135(1-2):68-77
pubmed: 19054633
J Med Microbiol. 2014 Mar;63(Pt 3):399-407
pubmed: 24324029
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014 Mar;37(2):79-88
pubmed: 24461712
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 31;10:70
pubmed: 30766521
J Vet Diagn Invest. 1996 Oct;8(4):448-50
pubmed: 8953529
J Avian Med Surg. 2017 Sep;31(3):262-282
pubmed: 28891690
Front Immunol. 2017 Dec 11;8:1652
pubmed: 29312283
Vet Microbiol. 2021 Aug;259:109166
pubmed: 34217040
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Mar 23;162(2-4):740-749
pubmed: 23098816
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Apr 19;99(3-4):295-9
pubmed: 15066732
Avian Dis. 1988 Oct-Dec;32(4):650-8
pubmed: 3060085
Avian Dis. 2013 Jun;57(2):242-7
pubmed: 24689181
Avian Pathol. 2003 Oct;32(5):435-61
pubmed: 14522700
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 16;8(1):4701
pubmed: 29549361
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Sep;48(9):3244-50
pubmed: 20592139
J Immunol. 2009 Jun 15;182(12):8063-70
pubmed: 19494332
Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1988 Jun;50(3):622-31
pubmed: 3210475
Vet J. 2009 Aug;181(2):145-50
pubmed: 18413292
Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 Nov;17(11):691-702
pubmed: 28736436
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):192
pubmed: 32131753
Mol Cell Probes. 2006 Feb;20(1):60-3
pubmed: 16330186
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190774
pubmed: 29324884
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 18;6:19638
pubmed: 26778053
J Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;197(3):449-56
pubmed: 18199030
J Vet Res. 2020 Dec 10;64(4):461-467
pubmed: 33367133
Pathog Dis. 2015 Feb;73(1):1-11
pubmed: 25663344
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 13;11(1):16516
pubmed: 34389764
Infect Genet Evol. 2009 Dec;9(6):1240-7
pubmed: 19715775
Vet Microbiol. 2019 Mar;230:90-94
pubmed: 30827411

Auteurs

Marloes Heijne (M)

Department of Bacteriology, Host-Pathogen Interaction and Diagnostics Development, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. marloes.heijne@wur.nl.

Jeanet van der Goot (J)

Department of Diagnostics and Crisis Organisation, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Herma Buys (H)

Department of Diagnostics and Crisis Organisation, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Annemieke Dinkla (A)

Department of Bacteriology, Host-Pathogen Interaction and Diagnostics Development, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Hendrik Jan Roest (HJ)

Department of Bacteriology, Host-Pathogen Interaction and Diagnostics Development, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Current Affiliation: Directorate Animal Supply Chain and Animal Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Lucien van Keulen (L)

Department of Bacteriology, Host-Pathogen Interaction and Diagnostics Development, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Ad Koets (A)

Department of Bacteriology, Host-Pathogen Interaction and Diagnostics Development, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH