Acceptability of the Cognition Test Battery in Astronaut and Astronaut-Surrogate Populations.
astronaut
cognition
cognitive test
neuropsychological test
performance
spaceflight
Journal
Acta astronautica
ISSN: 0094-5765
Titre abrégé: Acta Astronaut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9890631
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
entrez:
22
11
2021
pubmed:
23
11
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sustained high levels of astronaut cognitive performance are a prerequisite for mission success. A neuropsychological battery of 10 brief cognitive tests (Cognition) covering a range of cognitive domains was specifically developed for high performing astronauts to objectively assess cognitive performance. Extended mission durations require repeated cognitive testing and thus high acceptability of the Cognition software to the astronaut population. The aim of this qualitative study was to evaluate acceptability of Cognition to astronauts and astronaut surrogate populations. Cognition was administered repeatedly to N=87 subjects (mean age ±SD 35.1 ±8.7 years, 52.8% male) on a laptop or iPad across five individual studies on the International Space Station or in space analog environments on Earth. Following completion of each study, participants were interviewed regarding their experience using Cognition in a semi-structured debrief. Participant comments were analyzed using a qualitative conventional content analysis approach. The majority of participants' comments (86.1%) were coded as positive or neutral in valence, with most positive comments relating to software usability, engagement, and overall design. Among the 10 Cognition tests, subjects liked the Visual Object Learning Test most (28 likes, 32.2% of participants), while the Emotion Recognition Test was liked least (44 dislikes, 50.6% of participants). Some subjects (36.8%) were frustrated with the level of difficulty of some of the 10 Cognition tests, especially during early administrations, which was by design to avoid ceiling effects in repeated administrations of high-performers. Technical difficulties were rare (20.7% of participants), and most often observed in environments with restricted internet access. Most participants (82.3% of those who commented) liked the feedback provided by Cognition after each test, which includes a graph showing performance history. Cognition was found to be acceptable to astronaut and astronaut-surrogate populations across a variety of settings and mission durations. Participant feedback provided was used to further improve Cognition and increase its acceptability during sustained space missions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Sustained high levels of astronaut cognitive performance are a prerequisite for mission success. A neuropsychological battery of 10 brief cognitive tests (Cognition) covering a range of cognitive domains was specifically developed for high performing astronauts to objectively assess cognitive performance. Extended mission durations require repeated cognitive testing and thus high acceptability of the Cognition software to the astronaut population. The aim of this qualitative study was to evaluate acceptability of Cognition to astronauts and astronaut surrogate populations.
METHODS
METHODS
Cognition was administered repeatedly to N=87 subjects (mean age ±SD 35.1 ±8.7 years, 52.8% male) on a laptop or iPad across five individual studies on the International Space Station or in space analog environments on Earth. Following completion of each study, participants were interviewed regarding their experience using Cognition in a semi-structured debrief. Participant comments were analyzed using a qualitative conventional content analysis approach.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The majority of participants' comments (86.1%) were coded as positive or neutral in valence, with most positive comments relating to software usability, engagement, and overall design. Among the 10 Cognition tests, subjects liked the Visual Object Learning Test most (28 likes, 32.2% of participants), while the Emotion Recognition Test was liked least (44 dislikes, 50.6% of participants). Some subjects (36.8%) were frustrated with the level of difficulty of some of the 10 Cognition tests, especially during early administrations, which was by design to avoid ceiling effects in repeated administrations of high-performers. Technical difficulties were rare (20.7% of participants), and most often observed in environments with restricted internet access. Most participants (82.3% of those who commented) liked the feedback provided by Cognition after each test, which includes a graph showing performance history.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Cognition was found to be acceptable to astronaut and astronaut-surrogate populations across a variety of settings and mission durations. Participant feedback provided was used to further improve Cognition and increase its acceptability during sustained space missions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34803193
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.09.035
pmc: PMC8601114
mid: NIHMS1752768
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
14-23Subventions
Organisme : NASA
ID : NNX14AH27G
Pays : United States
Organisme : NASA
ID : NNX14AH98G
Pays : United States
Organisme : NASA
ID : NNX14AM81G
Pays : United States
Références
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Nov;86(11):942-52
pubmed: 26564759
Sleep. 1997 Apr;20(4):267-77
pubmed: 9231952
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Nov;25(5):766-76
pubmed: 11682260
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Oct;85(10):1033-48
pubmed: 25245904
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22
pubmed: 26184336
Science. 2019 Apr 12;364(6436):
pubmed: 30975860
Sleep. 2011 May 01;34(5):581-91
pubmed: 21532951
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):1-48
pubmed: 10945921
Front Physiol. 2020 Apr 28;11:394
pubmed: 32411017
Neuropsychology. 1997 Oct;11(4):602-612
pubmed: 9345704
Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Jan 1;47(1):34-42
pubmed: 10650447
Neuropsychology. 2002 Jul;16(3):370-9
pubmed: 12146684
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Jun;8(2):75-84
pubmed: 12075692
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Jul;42(5):516-529
pubmed: 32539487
J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Mar 30;187(2):254-62
pubmed: 19945485
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Sep 29;463(1):1-5
pubmed: 19631255
Arch Neurol. 1978 Jun;35(6):364-7
pubmed: 655909
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Sep;13(9):904-12
pubmed: 25127232