The Black Pill: New Technology and the Male Supremacy of Involuntarily Celibate Men.
communities
hegemonic masculinity
incels
misogyny
online
social media
technology
Journal
Men and masculinities
ISSN: 1097-184X
Titre abrégé: Men Masc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100910415
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
entrez:
22
11
2021
pubmed:
23
11
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Involuntary celibates, or "incels," are people who identify themselves by their inability to establish sexual partnerships. In this article, we use analytic abduction to qualitatively analyze 9,062 comments on a popular incel forum for heterosexual men that is characterized by extensive misogyny. Incels argue that emerging technologies reveal and compound the gender practices that produce involuntarily celibate men. First, incels argue that women's use of dating apps accelerates hypergamy. Second, incels suggest that highly desirable men use dating apps to partner with multiple women. Third, incels assert that subordinate men inflate women's egos and their "sexual marketplace value" through social media platforms. We argue that incels' focus on technology reinforces essentialist views on gender, buttresses male domination, dehumanizes women, and minimizes incels' own misogyny. We discuss findings in relation to theories of masculinity and social scientific research on the impacts of emerging technology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34803370
doi: 10.1177/1097184X211017954
pii: 10.1177_1097184X211017954
pmc: PMC8600582
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
823-841Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Mar;46(1):3-14
pubmed: 15869117
J Res Adolesc. 2019 Mar;29(1):196-209
pubmed: 29430759
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 May;22(5):344-348
pubmed: 30939034
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972 Dec;24(3):285-90
pubmed: 4655540