Recent Advances in Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies.
Covid-19
local anaesthetic
prostate biopsies
transperineal
transrectal
Journal
Research and reports in urology
ISSN: 2253-2447
Titre abrégé: Res Rep Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101576971
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
05
2021
accepted:
02
07
2021
entrez:
22
11
2021
pubmed:
23
11
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prostate biopsy is the definitive investigation to diagnose prostate cancer. The ideal procedure would be one that offers fast and efficient results safely as an outpatient procedure. Historically, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy is considered the gold standard but transrectal biopsy can under-sample the anterior and apical regions of the prostate and is associated with a risk of prostate biopsy-related sepsis, which may require intensive care admission. Transperineal (TP) biopsy addresses the inefficient sampling of TRUS biopsy but historically has been done under general anaesthetic, which makes it difficult to incorporate into timed diagnostic pathways such as the National Health Service (NHS) 2-week cancer pathway. TRUS biopsy has remained the mainstay of clinical diagnosis because of its simplicity; however, the recent development of simpler local anaesthetic transperineal techniques has transformed outpatient biopsy practice. These techniques practically eliminate prostate biopsy-related sepsis, have a shallow learning curve and offer effective sampling of all areas of the prostate in an outpatient setting. The effectiveness of TP biopsy has been enhanced by the introduction of multiparametric MRI prior to biopsy, the use of PSA density for risk stratification in equivocal cases and combined with more efficient targeted and systematic biopsies techniques, such as the Ginsburg Protocol, has improved the tolerability and diagnostic yield of local anaesthetic TP biopsies, reducing the risk of complications from the oversampling associated with transperineal template mapping biopsies. Areas where the literature remains unclear is the optimum number of cores needed to detect clinically significant disease (CSD) in patients with a definable lesion on MRI, in particular, whether there is a need for systematic biopsy in the face of equivocal MRI findings to ensure no CSD is missed. The Covid-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on prostate cancer referrals and prostate biopsy techniques within the UK; prior to the pandemic 65% of all prostate biopsies were TRUS, since the pandemic the proportions have reversed such that now over 65% of all prostate biopsies in the NHS are transperineal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34805013
doi: 10.2147/RRU.S291963
pii: 291963
pmc: PMC8598205
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
799-809Informations de copyright
© 2021 Devetzis et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Rick Popert is a Fellow on the NHS Innovation Accelerator. He receives honoraria for teaching and training from BXTAccelyon, the distributor of the PrecisionPoint Transperineal (TP) Access System. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
Références
World J Urol. 2014 Aug;32(4):925-30
pubmed: 24871425
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Mar;23(1):62-65
pubmed: 31932659
BJU Int. 2018 Jul;122(1):40-49
pubmed: 29024425
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Mar;49(3):439-448
pubmed: 28005230
BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):568-77
pubmed: 23773772
Arch Esp Urol. 2019 Mar;72(2):142-149
pubmed: 30855015
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jul-Aug;46(4):557-562
pubmed: 32213209
N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 8;317(15):909-16
pubmed: 2442609
World J Urol. 2019 Feb;37(2):337-342
pubmed: 29974188
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr;6(4):197-206
pubmed: 19333226
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1263-1279
pubmed: 30255394
BJU Int. 2021 Jan;127(1):122-130
pubmed: 32455504
BJU Int. 2010 Apr;105(8):1089-92
pubmed: 19818078
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):163-6; discussion 166-7
pubmed: 10604337
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):282-288
pubmed: 27574821
Curr Urol. 2020 Mar;14(1):22-31
pubmed: 32398993
Eur Urol. 2006 Aug;50(2):266-71
pubmed: 16448740
BJU Int. 2005 Nov;96(7):999-1004
pubmed: 16225516
J Clin Urol. 2020 Sep;13(5):364-370
pubmed: 33072331
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Aug;49(8):1335-1342
pubmed: 28477301
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):28-35
pubmed: 22093966
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):133-141
pubmed: 32232966
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 12;99(6):428-431
pubmed: 30786336
Turk J Urol. 2021 Feb;47(Supp. 1):S19-S26
pubmed: 33052837
Urol Oncol. 2018 Dec;36(12):528.e15-528.e20
pubmed: 30446447
J Clin Urol. 2018 May;11(3):192-199
pubmed: 29881622
BJU Int. 2017 Feb;119(2):225-233
pubmed: 26935594
BJU Int. 2021 Jan;127(1):30-34
pubmed: 32981180
J Urol. 1989 Jul;142(1):71-4; discussion 74-5
pubmed: 2659827
Cancer. 2005 May 1;103(9):1826-32
pubmed: 15756653
Urol J. 2016 Oct 10;13(5):2849-2855
pubmed: 27734428
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Jan 18;:
pubmed: 33478936
J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1121-1126
pubmed: 30835607
Turk J Urol. 2020 Sep;46(5):367-372
pubmed: 32744992
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;17(2):e94-e99
pubmed: 32779392
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):3018-3024
pubmed: 33457275
World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1943-1949
pubmed: 31679065
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1492-1500
pubmed: 32676436
BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):101
pubmed: 31660936
Urology. 2020 Jun;140:122-131
pubmed: 32061825
Int J Urol. 2020 Dec;27(12):1157-1158
pubmed: 32939819
Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):332-40
pubmed: 26995327
BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):280-285
pubmed: 32320126
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
BJU Int. 2008 Feb;101(3):293-8
pubmed: 17922870
Turk J Urol. 2019 Jul 1;45(4):237-244
pubmed: 31291186
BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):244-252
pubmed: 30431694
Urol Oncol. 2020 Sep;38(9):734.e19-734.e25
pubmed: 32321689
BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(8):1233-4
pubmed: 21958223
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):179-185
pubmed: 28753891
Urol Int. 2016;97(2):230-7
pubmed: 27256369
World J Urol. 2015 Oct;33(10):1475-9
pubmed: 25501797
BJU Int. 2016 Mar;117(3):392-400
pubmed: 26237632
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 15;9(1):
pubmed: 31952120
BJU Int. 2014 Jul;114(1):32-7
pubmed: 24053629