Retrospective study evaluating telehealth antenatal anesthesia consults for high-risk obstetric patients.
Anesthesiology
high-risk obstetrics
pregnancy
referral and consultation
telehealth
telemedicine
Journal
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
ISSN: 1476-4954
Titre abrégé: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101136916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
23
11
2021
medline:
24
11
2022
entrez:
22
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Telehealth has gained popularity, particularly in the COVID-19 era. The use of telehealth is now being applied to preoperative evaluation clinics in an effort to overcome barriers to antenatal anesthesia assessment of high-risk obstetrical patients. The objective of this study is to determine if the quality of antenatal anesthesia telehealth consults of high-risk obstetric patients is comparable to in-person encounters. This is determined by assessing if telehealth consults are feasible and meet the standards of care, as well as the level of patient satisfaction and ease of use as reported by providers. This retrospective study assessed patients prior to delivery who completed a video-telehealth anesthesia consultation (51 cases) from November 1st, 2019 to November 30th, 2020 and all of those for patients receiving an in-person anesthesia consultation (171 controls) from November 2017 through October 2019. Our primary hypothesis was that telehealth and in-person consultations would not result in different standards of care. The primary outcome was an indicator of meeting the standard of care, and the difference in proportions between the telehealth and in-person consultation was tested by Fisher's exact test. Our secondary hypotheses were that patients reported high levels of satisfaction and could use telehealth easily and providers could use the platform easily. Secondary outcomes were assessed by using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) and the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) surveys, respectively. For the primary outcome, 94.1% (48/51) of telehealth and 89.5% (153/171) of in-person visits met the standard of care, indicating no significant difference between groups ( This study demonstrates no significant difference in the standard of care between in-person and telehealth visits. Furthermore, telehealth consultation was feasible and associated with high patient satisfaction and platform usability. Preoperative consultation of high-risk obstetric patients using telehealth visits should be routinely considered in clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
UNASSIGNED
Telehealth has gained popularity, particularly in the COVID-19 era. The use of telehealth is now being applied to preoperative evaluation clinics in an effort to overcome barriers to antenatal anesthesia assessment of high-risk obstetrical patients.
OBJECTIVES
UNASSIGNED
The objective of this study is to determine if the quality of antenatal anesthesia telehealth consults of high-risk obstetric patients is comparable to in-person encounters. This is determined by assessing if telehealth consults are feasible and meet the standards of care, as well as the level of patient satisfaction and ease of use as reported by providers.
STUDY DESIGN
UNASSIGNED
This retrospective study assessed patients prior to delivery who completed a video-telehealth anesthesia consultation (51 cases) from November 1st, 2019 to November 30th, 2020 and all of those for patients receiving an in-person anesthesia consultation (171 controls) from November 2017 through October 2019. Our primary hypothesis was that telehealth and in-person consultations would not result in different standards of care. The primary outcome was an indicator of meeting the standard of care, and the difference in proportions between the telehealth and in-person consultation was tested by Fisher's exact test. Our secondary hypotheses were that patients reported high levels of satisfaction and could use telehealth easily and providers could use the platform easily. Secondary outcomes were assessed by using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) and the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) surveys, respectively.
RESULTS
UNASSIGNED
For the primary outcome, 94.1% (48/51) of telehealth and 89.5% (153/171) of in-person visits met the standard of care, indicating no significant difference between groups (
CONCLUSION
UNASSIGNED
This study demonstrates no significant difference in the standard of care between in-person and telehealth visits. Furthermore, telehealth consultation was feasible and associated with high patient satisfaction and platform usability. Preoperative consultation of high-risk obstetric patients using telehealth visits should be routinely considered in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34806512
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2005566
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM