Effect of mobile application user interface improvements on minimum expected home visit coverage by community health workers in Mali: a randomised controlled trial.
health services research
other diagnostic or tool
prevention strategies
public health
randomised control trial
Journal
BMJ global health
ISSN: 2059-7908
Titre abrégé: BMJ Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
17
08
2021
accepted:
18
10
2021
entrez:
24
11
2021
pubmed:
25
11
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proactive community case management (ProCCM) has shown promise to advance goals of universal health coverage (UHC). ProCCM community health workers (CHWs) face operational challenges when pursuing their goal of visiting every household in their service area at least twice monthly to proactively find sick patients. We developed a software extension (UHC Mode) to an existing CHW mobile application featuring user interface design improvements to support CHWs in planning daily home visits. We evaluated the effect of UHC Mode on minimum expected home visit coverage. We conducted a parallel-group, two-arm randomised controlled trial of ProCCM CHWs in two separate regions in Mali. CHWs were randomly assigned to UHC Mode or the standard mobile application (control) with a 1:1 allocation. Randomisation was stratified by health catchment area. CHWs and other programme personnel were not masked to arm allocation. CHWs used their assigned intervention for 4 months. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we estimated the mean change in minimum expected home visit coverage from preintervention to postintervention between arms. Enrolment occurred in January 2019. Of 199 eligible CHWs randomised to the intervention or control arm, 196 were enrolled and 195 were included in the analysis. Households whose CHW used UHC Mode had 2.41 times higher odds of minimum expected home visit coverage compared with households whose CHW used the control (95% CI 1.68 to 3.47; p<0.0005). Minimum expected home visit coverage in the UHC Mode arm increased 13.6 percentage points (95% CI 8.1 to 19.0) compared with the control arm. Our findings suggest UHC Mode is an effective tool that can improve home visit coverage and promote progress towards UHC when implemented in the ProCCM context. User interface design of health information systems that supports health workers' daily practices and meets their requirements can have a positive impact on health worker performance and home visit coverage. NCT04106921.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Proactive community case management (ProCCM) has shown promise to advance goals of universal health coverage (UHC). ProCCM community health workers (CHWs) face operational challenges when pursuing their goal of visiting every household in their service area at least twice monthly to proactively find sick patients. We developed a software extension (UHC Mode) to an existing CHW mobile application featuring user interface design improvements to support CHWs in planning daily home visits. We evaluated the effect of UHC Mode on minimum expected home visit coverage.
METHODS
We conducted a parallel-group, two-arm randomised controlled trial of ProCCM CHWs in two separate regions in Mali. CHWs were randomly assigned to UHC Mode or the standard mobile application (control) with a 1:1 allocation. Randomisation was stratified by health catchment area. CHWs and other programme personnel were not masked to arm allocation. CHWs used their assigned intervention for 4 months. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we estimated the mean change in minimum expected home visit coverage from preintervention to postintervention between arms.
RESULTS
Enrolment occurred in January 2019. Of 199 eligible CHWs randomised to the intervention or control arm, 196 were enrolled and 195 were included in the analysis. Households whose CHW used UHC Mode had 2.41 times higher odds of minimum expected home visit coverage compared with households whose CHW used the control (95% CI 1.68 to 3.47; p<0.0005). Minimum expected home visit coverage in the UHC Mode arm increased 13.6 percentage points (95% CI 8.1 to 19.0) compared with the control arm.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest UHC Mode is an effective tool that can improve home visit coverage and promote progress towards UHC when implemented in the ProCCM context. User interface design of health information systems that supports health workers' daily practices and meets their requirements can have a positive impact on health worker performance and home visit coverage.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT04106921.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34815242
pii: bmjgh-2021-007205
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007205
pmc: PMC8609935
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04106921']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: AJ, CW, DL, JEY, KK, SIN’D, YD and YK are employed by the non-profit organisation, Muso. The Muso team designed the Proactive Community Case Management approach. FF and IH are employed by the non-profit organisation, Medic. The Medic team serves as lead developer of the Community Health Toolkit open source project. Both Medic and Muso participated in the development of UHC Mode, as described in the manuscript. Both the CHT and UHC Mode are public goods to be made available open-source. All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/downloads/coi_disclosure.docx (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no other conflicts of interest.
Références
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e027487
pubmed: 31455700
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Aug;24(8):845-855
pubmed: 29684634
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):104-12
pubmed: 14633936
Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):795-803
pubmed: 21820166
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020418
pubmed: 30333922
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010808
pubmed: 31275568
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 17;8(7):e68930
pubmed: 23874816
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 23;(3):CD007754
pubmed: 25803792
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Mar;94(3):596-604
pubmed: 26787148
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Mar 12;3(2):e000634
pubmed: 29607100
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e2-8
pubmed: 23355463
J Glob Health. 2014 Dec;4(2):020401
pubmed: 25520791
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD009527
pubmed: 23728693
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Feb;6(2):e152-e168
pubmed: 29248365
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 19;20(1):305
pubmed: 32430032
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 15;4(6):e001799
pubmed: 31908858
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Mar;94(3):584-595
pubmed: 26787147
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):106-114
pubmed: 30517663
Inf Technol Dev. 2019 Sep 29;26(3):477-505
pubmed: 32982007
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD004015
pubmed: 20238326
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):e74-82
pubmed: 23678926