Predictive value of overt and non-overt volume overload in patients with high- or low-gradient aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
heart failure (HF)
low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS)
plasma volume status (PVS)
Journal
Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy
ISSN: 2223-3652
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101601613
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
03
05
2021
accepted:
08
06
2021
entrez:
24
11
2021
pubmed:
25
11
2021
medline:
25
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The plasma volume status (PVS) is considered a marker of non-overt cardiac congestion and is of prognostic value. Patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) suffer from impaired left ventricular function and show signs of heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that PVS might predict post-interventional rehospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In this retrospective, observational analysis, PVS before transfemoral TAVI was calculated by a formula taking into account hematocrit and weight. The predictive performance of PVS was compared with that of prior cardiac decompensation (PCD). In the entire cohort of n=2,458 patients, PVS >-4% (high plasma volume) identified patients (n=1,013) with a higher post-interventional 1-year mortality rate than patients (n=1,445) with a PVS ≤-4% (low plasma volume). However, PVS lost prognostic independence when adjusted for anemia, whereas PCD did not. A high PVS and PCD were not correlated, and both parameters similarly revealed a low sensitivity and specificity but a high negative predictive value (NPV) for future HF events. PVS was not different between control patients (n=1,512) and those with intermediate (paradoxical LFLG-AS, n=327) or high risk scores (LFLG-AS, n=239). The accuracy of high PVS in predicting adverse events in these subpopulations was the same as in the study population overall. Kaplan-Maier analyses demonstrated similar prognostic impacts for PVS and PCD. PVS and PCD represent two independent parameters of volume overload with unfavorable prognostic significance. Pre-interventional PVS does not appear to be suitable for predicting clinical outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing TAVI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The plasma volume status (PVS) is considered a marker of non-overt cardiac congestion and is of prognostic value. Patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) suffer from impaired left ventricular function and show signs of heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that PVS might predict post-interventional rehospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
METHODS
METHODS
In this retrospective, observational analysis, PVS before transfemoral TAVI was calculated by a formula taking into account hematocrit and weight. The predictive performance of PVS was compared with that of prior cardiac decompensation (PCD).
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the entire cohort of n=2,458 patients, PVS >-4% (high plasma volume) identified patients (n=1,013) with a higher post-interventional 1-year mortality rate than patients (n=1,445) with a PVS ≤-4% (low plasma volume). However, PVS lost prognostic independence when adjusted for anemia, whereas PCD did not. A high PVS and PCD were not correlated, and both parameters similarly revealed a low sensitivity and specificity but a high negative predictive value (NPV) for future HF events. PVS was not different between control patients (n=1,512) and those with intermediate (paradoxical LFLG-AS, n=327) or high risk scores (LFLG-AS, n=239). The accuracy of high PVS in predicting adverse events in these subpopulations was the same as in the study population overall. Kaplan-Maier analyses demonstrated similar prognostic impacts for PVS and PCD.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PVS and PCD represent two independent parameters of volume overload with unfavorable prognostic significance. Pre-interventional PVS does not appear to be suitable for predicting clinical outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing TAVI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34815958
doi: 10.21037/cdt-21-286
pii: cdt-11-05-1080
pmc: PMC8569265
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1080-1092Informations de copyright
2021 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-21-286). MR receives speaker fees from Abbott. CL receives lecture, consulting fees and/or support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer lngelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer-Bristol-Myers Squibb, Thermo Fisher, Xenios AG. Yeong-Hoon Choi receives proctor/speaker/scientific advisor fees from Getinge, Jotec/CryoLife, Cytosorbents. CWH is on advisory board of Medtronic. WKK receives proctor/advisory board/speaker fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Meril Life Sciences, Shockwave Medical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):1990-2001
pubmed: 33666353
Heart. 2019 Jul;105(13):1020-1026
pubmed: 30826773
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov;42(5):S45-60
pubmed: 23026738
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 May;99(5):1503-09; discussion 1509-10
pubmed: 25840608
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1968;405:5-37
pubmed: 4975372
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Nov;3(11):886-93
pubmed: 26541787
Lancet. 2003 Mar 29;361(9363):1077-83
pubmed: 12672310
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Jan;17(1):35-43
pubmed: 25469484
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Apr 22;:e13251
pubmed: 32323303
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;27(2_suppl):27-34
pubmed: 33238738
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;22(10):1866-1874
pubmed: 32441856
Circulation. 2018 Jul 3;138(1):80-98
pubmed: 29967232
Am Heart J. 2021 Jan;231:25-31
pubmed: 33091365
Open Heart. 2020 Dec;7(2):
pubmed: 33361316
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 26;14(11):e0225473
pubmed: 31770401
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 11;10(23):2426-2436
pubmed: 29217006
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jan;109(1):110-117
pubmed: 31288017
Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Aug;15(8):885-91
pubmed: 23460732
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Nov;109(11):1392-1401
pubmed: 32253507
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 22;12(8):752-763
pubmed: 31000012
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 15;137:89-96
pubmed: 32991853
Heart. 2020 Jun;106(11):830-837
pubmed: 32066613