Bending versus Twisting Acenes - A Computational Study.
Acenes
Aromaticity
Conjugation
Curved aromatics
Organic electronic materials
Journal
European journal of organic chemistry
ISSN: 1434-193X
Titre abrégé: European J Org Chem
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9805750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2021
21 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
20
07
2021
revised:
23
09
2021
entrez:
25
11
2021
pubmed:
26
11
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are widely used in organic electronic devices. The electronic, magnetic, and optical properties of PAHs can be tuned by structural modifications to the aromatic backbone to introduce an inherent distortion from planarity, such as bending or twisting. However, it remains difficult to isolate and control the effects of such distortions. Here, we sought to understand how backbone twisting and bending affect the electronic properties of acenes, as models for larger PAHs. We found that, even when highly distorted from planarity (30° per ring), acenes maintain their aromatic character and π orbital delocalization with minor mixing of the σ and π orbitals. In addition, the energy gap between the HOMO and LUMO decreases with increasing twist, while the gap is hardly affected by bending, since the energy of both orbitals increase to a similar extent. For bent acenes in the triplet state, the spin becomes more localized with increasing bend, whereas twisting produces an evenly distributed spin delocalization. These findings can guide the synthesis of PAHs with tailored properties.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34819798
doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202100865
pii: EJOC202100865
pmc: PMC8597036
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5424-5429Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Organic Chemistry published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Chem Rev. 2004 Nov;104(11):4891-946
pubmed: 15535637
Chemistry. 2018 May 23;24(29):7374-7387
pubmed: 29528165
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Dec 31;130(52):17646-7
pubmed: 19055403
Nat Chem. 2021 Mar;13(3):255-259
pubmed: 33495606
Chem Soc Rev. 2015 Sep 21;44(18):6494-518
pubmed: 26024232
Chem Soc Rev. 2010 Aug;39(8):2879-90
pubmed: 20532265
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021 Apr 26;60(18):10311-10318
pubmed: 33599364
Chemistry. 2020 Aug 21;26(47):10653-10675
pubmed: 32118325
Chemistry. 2019 Mar 1;25(13):3279-3285
pubmed: 30614087
Nat Chem. 2014 May;6(5):383-5
pubmed: 24755587
Acc Chem Res. 2014 Aug 19;47(8):2582-91
pubmed: 25068503
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019 Oct 14;21(38):21588-21595
pubmed: 31539003
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49(4):757-9
pubmed: 20014269
Chem Rev. 2006 Dec;106(12):4809-19
pubmed: 17165675
J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 30;127(12):4162-3
pubmed: 15783185
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2008 Nov 28;10(44):6615-20
pubmed: 18989472
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1988 Jan 15;37(2):785-789
pubmed: 9944570
Chemistry. 2020 Oct 1;26(55):12579-12588
pubmed: 32350943
J Am Chem Soc. 2019 May 8;141(18):7399-7406
pubmed: 31016976
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019 Jul 1;58(27):9166-9170
pubmed: 31074924
Org Lett. 2016 Mar 18;18(6):1430-3
pubmed: 26953497
Science. 2017 Apr 14;356(6334):172-175
pubmed: 28408599
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021 Feb 1;60(5):2658-2662
pubmed: 33047813
J Org Chem. 2003 Mar 21;68(6):2089-98
pubmed: 12636366
J Org Chem. 2008 Oct 17;73(20):8001-9
pubmed: 18798674
Org Lett. 2002 Jan 10;4(1):15-8
pubmed: 11772079
Acc Chem Res. 2015 Mar 17;48(3):557-66
pubmed: 25689579
Acc Chem Res. 2019 Sep 17;52(9):2482-2490
pubmed: 31453688
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Jul 5;140(26):8086-8090
pubmed: 29905480