Cemiplimab in an Elderly Frail Population of Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Real-Life Experience From Italy.

advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cemiplimab checkpoint inhibitors elderly patients immunocompromised patients

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 26 03 2021
accepted: 11 10 2021
entrez: 25 11 2021
pubmed: 26 11 2021
medline: 26 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common skin cancer whose incidence is growing parallel to the lengthening of the average lifespan. Cemiplimab, an antiPD-1 monoclonal antibody, is the first approved immunotherapy for patients with locally advanced CSCC (laCSCC) or metastatic CSCC (mCSCC) thanks to phase I and II studies showing high antitumor activity and good tolerability. Nevertheless, at present, very few data are available regarding cemiplimab in real-life experience and in frail, elderly, and immunosuppressed patients as well as regarding biomarkers able to predict response so as to guide therapeutic choices. We built a retroprospective cohort study including 30 non-selected patients with laCSCC (25) and mCSCC (five) treated with cemiplimab from August 2019 to November 2020. Clinical outcomes, toxicity profile, and correlations with disease, patients, and peripheral blood parameters are explored. The median age was 81 years (range, 36-95), with 24 males and five patients having an immunosuppressive condition, while the frailty prevalence was 83% based on index derived from age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. We reported 23 responses (76.7%) with nine complete responses (30%). A statistically significant higher response rate was observed in head and neck primary tumors and in patients with hemoglobin level >12 g/dl. No difference was observed with respect to frailty, median age, sex, and body mass index. The baseline low neuthophil/lymphocyte ratio and low platelet/lymphocyte ratio resulted to be also correlated with a better response. Moreover, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte behaviors had an opposite trend in responders and non-responders. An overall response was reported in four of five immunosuppressed patients. Seventeen patients (57.6%) have an ongoing response and are still alive. Six responders had interrupted treatment (two for toxicity and four for personal choice) but maintained their response. The treatment was well tolerated by the majority of patients. The most common adverse events were fatigue in seven patients (23.3%) and skin toxicity in 10 patients (33.3%), including pruritus in six patients, rash in three patients, and bullous erythema in one patient. In our real-life experience, cemiplimab showed a high antitumor activity with acceptable safety profile similar to those in trials with selected patients. Moreover, its antitumor activity resulted to be not impaired in very elderly patients and in those with immunocompromised status.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common skin cancer whose incidence is growing parallel to the lengthening of the average lifespan. Cemiplimab, an antiPD-1 monoclonal antibody, is the first approved immunotherapy for patients with locally advanced CSCC (laCSCC) or metastatic CSCC (mCSCC) thanks to phase I and II studies showing high antitumor activity and good tolerability. Nevertheless, at present, very few data are available regarding cemiplimab in real-life experience and in frail, elderly, and immunosuppressed patients as well as regarding biomarkers able to predict response so as to guide therapeutic choices.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
We built a retroprospective cohort study including 30 non-selected patients with laCSCC (25) and mCSCC (five) treated with cemiplimab from August 2019 to November 2020. Clinical outcomes, toxicity profile, and correlations with disease, patients, and peripheral blood parameters are explored.
RESULTS RESULTS
The median age was 81 years (range, 36-95), with 24 males and five patients having an immunosuppressive condition, while the frailty prevalence was 83% based on index derived from age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. We reported 23 responses (76.7%) with nine complete responses (30%). A statistically significant higher response rate was observed in head and neck primary tumors and in patients with hemoglobin level >12 g/dl. No difference was observed with respect to frailty, median age, sex, and body mass index. The baseline low neuthophil/lymphocyte ratio and low platelet/lymphocyte ratio resulted to be also correlated with a better response. Moreover, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte behaviors had an opposite trend in responders and non-responders. An overall response was reported in four of five immunosuppressed patients. Seventeen patients (57.6%) have an ongoing response and are still alive. Six responders had interrupted treatment (two for toxicity and four for personal choice) but maintained their response. The treatment was well tolerated by the majority of patients. The most common adverse events were fatigue in seven patients (23.3%) and skin toxicity in 10 patients (33.3%), including pruritus in six patients, rash in three patients, and bullous erythema in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In our real-life experience, cemiplimab showed a high antitumor activity with acceptable safety profile similar to those in trials with selected patients. Moreover, its antitumor activity resulted to be not impaired in very elderly patients and in those with immunocompromised status.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34820323
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.686308
pmc: PMC8606572
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

686308

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Strippoli, Fanizzi, Quaresmini, Nardone, Armenio, Figliuolo, Filotico, Fucci, Mele, Traversa, De Luca, Montagna, Ruggieri, Ferraiuolo, Macina, Tommasi, Sciacovelli, De Risi, Albano, Massafra and Guida.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Invest Dermatol. 2014 Jan;134(1):43-50
pubmed: 23877569
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;11(1):125
pubmed: 30305116
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Apr;11(3):515-522
pubmed: 31928943
Immunotherapy. 2020 Aug;12(11):785-798
pubmed: 32657234
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Jun;8(1):
pubmed: 32554615
Dermatol Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):40-49
pubmed: 27618393
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:250-258
pubmed: 34536948
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 Apr 11;10:1758835918768240
pubmed: 29662550
Trials. 2020 Apr 22;21(1):352
pubmed: 32321565
Cancer. 2002 May 15;94(10):2793-6; author reply 2796-7
pubmed: 12173350
Int J Dermatol. 2014 Mar;53(3):267-74
pubmed: 24320558
Eur J Cancer. 2019 May;113:1-9
pubmed: 30954880
Health Serv Res. 2003 Aug;38(4):1103-20
pubmed: 12968819
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Oct;151(10):1081-6
pubmed: 25928283
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;39(6):545-548
pubmed: 24879468
Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1536-1544
pubmed: 30297899
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1091-1101
pubmed: 25403592
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Oct;138:125-132
pubmed: 32882466
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Feb;149(2):178-86
pubmed: 23560298
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 19;13(4):
pubmed: 33669537
Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):368-376
pubmed: 27687304
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Nov;21(11):785-798
pubmed: 34344638
J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Jun;131(6):1322-30
pubmed: 21307877
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 6;105(5):350-60
pubmed: 23291375
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jun;19(6):737-746
pubmed: 29778737
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2500-2501
pubmed: 29262275
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 15;20(24):6582-92
pubmed: 25303977
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Sep;16(5):1134-1139
pubmed: 33004760
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):294-305
pubmed: 31952975
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;128:83-102
pubmed: 32113942
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;810:120-40
pubmed: 25207363
Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;217:107662
pubmed: 32805297
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 22;8:715513
pubmed: 34368203
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3419-26
pubmed: 21810686
Leukemia. 2020 Jan;34(1):224-233
pubmed: 31427722
JAAD Case Rep. 2019 Aug 29;5(9):763-766
pubmed: 31516991
Oncologist. 2020 Jun;25(6):505-514
pubmed: 32043699
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 05;22(5):
pubmed: 33807855
Br J Cancer. 2020 Nov;123(10):1535-1542
pubmed: 32868898
J Geriatr Oncol. 2015 Mar;6(2):133-40
pubmed: 25666905
Eur J Dermatol. 2019 Dec 1;29(6):636-640
pubmed: 31903954
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jun;68(6):957-66
pubmed: 23375456
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;147(6):1803-1811
pubmed: 33210210
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Nov 5;12:1758835920970049
pubmed: 33224276
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 22;11:625872
pubmed: 33692958

Auteurs

Sabino Strippoli (S)

Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Annarita Fanizzi (A)

Health Physics Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Davide Quaresmini (D)

Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Annalisa Nardone (A)

Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Andrea Armenio (A)

Plastic Surgery Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Francesco Figliuolo (F)

Plastic Surgery Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Raffaele Filotico (R)

Dermatology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Livia Fucci (L)

Pathology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Fabio Mele (F)

Pathology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Michele Traversa (M)

Radiology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Federica De Luca (F)

Radiology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Elisabetta Sara Montagna (ES)

Medical Oncology Unit "Don Tonino Bello", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Eustachio Ruggieri (E)

General Surgery Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Simona Ferraiuolo (S)

Pharmacy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Francesco Macina (F)

Interventional and Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Stefania Tommasi (S)

Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Angela Monica Sciacovelli (AM)

Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Ivana De Risi (I)

Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Anna Albano (A)

Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Raffaella Massafra (R)

Health Physics Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Michele Guida (M)

Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.

Classifications MeSH