Responsible nudging for social good: new healthcare skills for AI-driven digital personal assistants.
Artificial intelligence
Medical AI
Nudging
Technoethics
Journal
Medicine, health care, and philosophy
ISSN: 1572-8633
Titre abrégé: Med Health Care Philos
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9815900
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
accepted:
16
11
2021
pubmed:
26
11
2021
medline:
23
2
2022
entrez:
25
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Traditional medical practices and relationships are changing given the widespread adoption of AI-driven technologies across the various domains of health and healthcare. In many cases, these new technologies are not specific to the field of healthcare. Still, they are existent, ubiquitous, and commercially available systems upskilled to integrate these novel care practices. Given the widespread adoption, coupled with the dramatic changes in practices, new ethical and social issues emerge due to how these systems nudge users into making decisions and changing behaviours. This article discusses how these AI-driven systems pose particular ethical challenges with regards to nudging. To confront these issues, the value sensitive design (VSD) approach is adopted as a principled methodology that designers can adopt to design these systems to avoid harming and contribute to the social good. The AI for Social Good (AI4SG) factors are adopted as the norms constraining maleficence. In contrast, higher-order values specific to AI, such as those from the EU High-Level Expert Group on AI and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, are adopted as the values to be promoted as much as possible in design. The use case of Amazon Alexa's Healthcare Skills is used to illustrate this design approach. It provides an exemplar of how designers and engineers can begin to orientate their design programs of these technologies towards the social good.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34822096
doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10062-z
pii: 10.1007/s11019-021-10062-z
pmc: PMC8613457
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11-22Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Health Care Anal. 2018 Dec;26(4):380-397
pubmed: 29644562
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 19;2:52
pubmed: 31304398
Moral Philos Politics. 2019;6(1):65-87
pubmed: 34040928
Development (Rome). 2020;63(2-4):200-204
pubmed: 33192033
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 16;3:122
pubmed: 33015374
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Jan;49(1):15-21
pubmed: 30790315
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(7):475
pubmed: 12973638
Public Choice. 2021 Jun 3;:1-11
pubmed: 34103770
AI Ethics. 2021;1(3):283-296
pubmed: 34790942
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2018;28(4):735-774
pubmed: 30930542
Resuscitation. 2019 Jul;140:16-22
pubmed: 31078650
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 04;17(9):
pubmed: 32375330
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2018;28(4):689-707
pubmed: 30930541
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Dec 26;70(690):8-9
pubmed: 31879289
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002689
pubmed: 30399149
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1771-1796
pubmed: 32246245
Health Econ Policy Law. 2017 Apr;12(2):195-205
pubmed: 28332461
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 9;1:12
pubmed: 31304297
Per Med. 2016 Nov;13(6):563-574
pubmed: 29754546
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Sep;24(3):315-327
pubmed: 33721157