Consensus Statement: Hemostasis Trial Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery and Mechanical Support.
Journal
The Annals of thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1552-6259
Titre abrégé: Ann Thorac Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 15030100R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
received:
26
02
2021
revised:
08
08
2021
accepted:
27
09
2021
pubmed:
27
11
2021
medline:
9
4
2022
entrez:
26
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Research evaluating hemostatic agents for the treatment of clinically significant bleeding has been hampered by inconsistency and lack of standardized primary clinical trial outcomes. Clinical trials of hemostatic agents in both cardiac surgery and mechanical circulatory support, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventricular assist devices, are examples of studies that lack implementation of universally accepted outcomes. A subgroup of experts convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the US Department of Defense developed consensus recommendations for primary outcomes in cardiac surgery and mechanical circulatory support. For cardiac surgery the primary efficacy endpoint of total allogeneic blood products (units vs mL/kg for pediatric patients) administered intraoperatively and postoperatively through day 5 or hospital discharge is recommended. For mechanical circulatory support outside the perioperative period the recommended primary outcome for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a 5-point ordinal score of thrombosis and bleeding severity adapted from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The recommended primary endpoint for ventricular assist device is freedom from disabling stroke (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events AE ≥ grade 3) through day 180. The proposed composite risk scores could impact the design of upcoming clinical trials and enable comparability of future investigations. Harmonizing and disseminating global consensus definitions and management guidelines can also reduce patient heterogeneity that would confound standardized primary outcomes in future research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Research evaluating hemostatic agents for the treatment of clinically significant bleeding has been hampered by inconsistency and lack of standardized primary clinical trial outcomes. Clinical trials of hemostatic agents in both cardiac surgery and mechanical circulatory support, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventricular assist devices, are examples of studies that lack implementation of universally accepted outcomes.
METHODS
A subgroup of experts convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the US Department of Defense developed consensus recommendations for primary outcomes in cardiac surgery and mechanical circulatory support.
RESULTS
For cardiac surgery the primary efficacy endpoint of total allogeneic blood products (units vs mL/kg for pediatric patients) administered intraoperatively and postoperatively through day 5 or hospital discharge is recommended. For mechanical circulatory support outside the perioperative period the recommended primary outcome for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a 5-point ordinal score of thrombosis and bleeding severity adapted from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The recommended primary endpoint for ventricular assist device is freedom from disabling stroke (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events AE ≥ grade 3) through day 180.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed composite risk scores could impact the design of upcoming clinical trials and enable comparability of future investigations. Harmonizing and disseminating global consensus definitions and management guidelines can also reduce patient heterogeneity that would confound standardized primary outcomes in future research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34826386
pii: S0003-4975(21)01975-5
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.09.080
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hemostatics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1026-1035Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.