Clinical decision support systems with team-based care on type 2 diabetes improvement for Medicaid patients: A quality improvement project.

Clinical decision support systems Clinical inertia HbA1c Team-based care Type 2 diabetes

Journal

International journal of medical informatics
ISSN: 1872-8243
Titre abrégé: Int J Med Inform
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 9711057

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 13 05 2021
revised: 06 10 2021
accepted: 24 10 2021
pubmed: 27 11 2021
medline: 27 11 2021
entrez: 26 11 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The prevalence of clinical inertia, the failure of appropriate treatment intensification in diabetes treatment, is a well-documented worldwide phenomenon. This project addresses the problem of clinical inertia through three interrelated activities, clinical decision support (CDSS), team-based care, and patient engagement in diabetes management. The purpose of this research is to provide analysis under the State-University Partnership Learning Network regarding the impact of an electronic decision support tool combined with team-based care workflow on provider decision-making and patient outcomes for the treatment of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (diabetes) among patients receiving Kentucky Medicaid. The objectives of this study are to 1) assess clinical outcomes of type 2 diabetes in the Medicaid population with team-based care using CDSS, 2) evaluate physicians' and pharmacists' experience on CDSS. This is a quality improvement project using a mixed-method - longitudinal and control group comparison of outcomes based upon clinical measures and online surveys of providers and pharmacists involved in this project. Patients treated by providers who changed the treatment regimen to one that either fully or partially followed the recommendation of the CDSS tool had a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c with an average initial HbA1c of 10.1 and the final HbA1c of 8. The online survey of physicians shows that more than 80% of physicians agree the use of CDSS will support improved patient outcomes. The use of a team-based care approach that includes pharmacists in implementing treatment changes was broadly supported by both physicians and pharmacists. CDSS combined with team-based care can be effective in reducing HbA1c to targeted therapeutic levels. The use of CDSS provides a way to efficiently assess more than 160 potential frontline drugs and properly accelerate treatment. Consistent with the research literature, the inclusion of pharmacists can play a key role in team-based care to assess treatment alternatives and provide for improvement in outcomes and patient adherence for diabetes. The user surveys show both physicians and pharmacists have a positive attitude toward CDSS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The prevalence of clinical inertia, the failure of appropriate treatment intensification in diabetes treatment, is a well-documented worldwide phenomenon. This project addresses the problem of clinical inertia through three interrelated activities, clinical decision support (CDSS), team-based care, and patient engagement in diabetes management.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this research is to provide analysis under the State-University Partnership Learning Network regarding the impact of an electronic decision support tool combined with team-based care workflow on provider decision-making and patient outcomes for the treatment of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (diabetes) among patients receiving Kentucky Medicaid. The objectives of this study are to 1) assess clinical outcomes of type 2 diabetes in the Medicaid population with team-based care using CDSS, 2) evaluate physicians' and pharmacists' experience on CDSS.
METHODS METHODS
This is a quality improvement project using a mixed-method - longitudinal and control group comparison of outcomes based upon clinical measures and online surveys of providers and pharmacists involved in this project.
RESULTS RESULTS
Patients treated by providers who changed the treatment regimen to one that either fully or partially followed the recommendation of the CDSS tool had a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c with an average initial HbA1c of 10.1 and the final HbA1c of 8. The online survey of physicians shows that more than 80% of physicians agree the use of CDSS will support improved patient outcomes. The use of a team-based care approach that includes pharmacists in implementing treatment changes was broadly supported by both physicians and pharmacists.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
CDSS combined with team-based care can be effective in reducing HbA1c to targeted therapeutic levels. The use of CDSS provides a way to efficiently assess more than 160 potential frontline drugs and properly accelerate treatment. Consistent with the research literature, the inclusion of pharmacists can play a key role in team-based care to assess treatment alternatives and provide for improvement in outcomes and patient adherence for diabetes. The user surveys show both physicians and pharmacists have a positive attitude toward CDSS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34826757
pii: S1386-5056(21)00252-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104626
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104626

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Xiaoni Zhang (X)

Department of Business Informatics, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, United States. Electronic address: zhangx@nku.edu.

Michelle Svec (M)

St. Elizabeth Healthcare, 1 Medical Village Dr., Edgewood, KY 41017, United States. Electronic address: Michelle.Svec@stelizabeth.com.

Robert Tracy (R)

St. Elizabeth Healthcare, 1 Medical Village Dr., Edgewood, KY 41017, United States. Electronic address: Robert.tracy@stlizabeth.com.

Gary Ozanich (G)

Department of Business Informatics, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, United States. Electronic address: ozanichg1@nku.edu.

Classifications MeSH