Do Rubber Floor Mats Prevent Lameness in Gestating Sows Housed in Large Groups? A Field Experiment on Three Commercial Farms in France.
lameness
soil lining
sow
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Nov 2021
05 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
21
09
2021
revised:
26
10
2021
accepted:
27
10
2021
entrez:
27
11
2021
pubmed:
28
11
2021
medline:
28
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lameness and foot disorders are major health and welfare issues in intensive swine production systems. They are exacerbated when sows are housed in large groups on slatted concrete floors during gestation. Our study aimed to assess the effect of rubber mats in the lying area of the gestation pen on lameness and leg health in gestating sows housed in large pens in commercial conditions. The study was conducted on three commercial farms over two successive gestations. A total of 582 Large White × Landrace sows, housed in 10 static groups, were enrolled: 5 groups in pens with rubber mats and 5 groups on slatted concrete floors. Lameness, bursitis, leg injuries, claw growth defects and claw lesions were measured at the beginning, middle and end of each gestation period. The rubber mats decreased the risk of suffering from bursitis, but had no effect on the risk of lameness, leg injuries, claw growth defects or claw lesions. Sows housed on rubber mats were heavily soiled compared with those on slatted concrete floors because the mats were not perforated for slurry evacuation. Locomotion disorders and foot lesions remained prevalent despite the rubber mats in the lying area of the gestation pens, but adding rubber mats in service rooms and farrowing crates may produce better results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34827892
pii: ani11113160
doi: 10.3390/ani11113160
pmc: PMC8614336
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : French Ministry of Agriculture
ID : Specific convention
Références
Animal. 2014 Jan;8(1):121-7
pubmed: 24168821
Prev Vet Med. 2010 Jun 1;95(1-2):16-22
pubmed: 20382437
J Anim Sci. 2013 Aug;91(8):3940-54
pubmed: 23881683
Prev Vet Med. 1998 Jan;33(1-4):109-19
pubmed: 9500168
Animal. 2010 Nov;4(11):1922-8
pubmed: 22445153
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Sep 1;116(1-2):102-10
pubmed: 24924857
J Anim Sci. 2016 May;94(5):2086-96
pubmed: 27285705
Acta Vet Scand. 2013 Feb 15;55:12
pubmed: 23414554
Vet Rec. 2006 Sep 16;159(12):383-7
pubmed: 16980524
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1990 Feb 1;103(2):51-60
pubmed: 2306204
Animal. 2018 Oct;12(10):2130-2137
pubmed: 29332611
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 28;11(9):e0163625
pubmed: 27680675
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2011 Jan-Feb;124(1-2):17-21
pubmed: 21306053
J Anim Sci. 2014 Aug;92(8):3537-42
pubmed: 25074453
Animal. 2021 Mar;15(3):100158
pubmed: 33573987
Vet J. 2017 Feb;220:28-33
pubmed: 28190490
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2005 Oct;52(8):423-8
pubmed: 16176574
J Anim Sci. 2008 Feb;86(2):432-41
pubmed: 17998436
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Sep 15;235(6):734-8
pubmed: 19751172