Analysis of Housing Risk Factors for the Welfare of Lean and Heavy Pigs in a Sample of European Fattening Farms.

bedding material body lesion scores enriched environment fattening pig housing system pig welfare roughage tail docking

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 09 10 2021
revised: 07 11 2021
accepted: 10 11 2021
entrez: 27 11 2021
pubmed: 28 11 2021
medline: 28 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pig welfare is affected by housing conditions, the minimum requirements of which are set up by EU legislation. Animal and non-animal-based measures are useful indicators to investigate housing risk factors for pig welfare. An observational study on 51 pig farms in seven EU countries, aimed at investigating housing risk factors for the welfare of finishing pigs, showed body weight and presence of bedded solid floored resting area (BED) identifying three clusters of farms. Farms with BED were featured by no or limited tail docking, larger availability of manipulable materials and lower number of pigs per farm and per annual work unit. In these farms, less skin and ear lesions were found, compared with lean pigs of farms without BED, which were characterized by lower pig space allowance, mortality rate and medication cost. In farms without BED, heavy pigs were featured by more space per pig, more pigs per drinker and higher mortality rate and medication cost per pig, compared to lean pigs. No statistical difference in tail lesions was found between the three farm clusters, although tail docking was performed in all farms without BED and not performed on most farms with BED.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34827955
pii: ani11113221
doi: 10.3390/ani11113221
pmc: PMC8614386
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : European Commission
ID : 696231

Références

Animal. 2017 Oct;11(10):1816-1824
pubmed: 28249629
Vet J. 2017 May;223:21-26
pubmed: 28671066
Animal. 2016 Jan;10(1):142-9
pubmed: 26304017
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Oct 1;146:114-120
pubmed: 28992915
Porcine Health Manag. 2018 Nov 16;4:27
pubmed: 30473870
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 02;11(2):
pubmed: 33540926
Porcine Health Manag. 2016 Jun 9;2:14
pubmed: 28405440
Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):656-67
pubmed: 22436283
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 06;11(6):
pubmed: 34204037
Porcine Health Manag. 2015 Apr 16;1:4
pubmed: 28405413
Animals (Basel). 2013 Aug 14;3(3):786-807
pubmed: 26479534
Animal. 2014 Sep;8(9):1479-97
pubmed: 25130712
EFSA J. 2020 Jul 20;18(7):e06195
pubmed: 32704316

Auteurs

Paolo Ferrari (P)

Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, P.le delle Cascine, 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy.

Alessandro Ulrici (A)

Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola, 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Matteo Barbari (M)

Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, P.le delle Cascine, 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy.

Classifications MeSH