Recyclability and Redesign Challenges in Multilayer Flexible Food Packaging-A Review.
flexible packaging
mono-material
multilayer packaging
polyolefin
recyclability
redesign
shelf-life of foods
Journal
Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Nov 2021
05 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
29
09
2021
revised:
24
10
2021
accepted:
30
10
2021
entrez:
27
11
2021
pubmed:
28
11
2021
medline:
28
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multilayer flexible food packaging is under pressure to redesign for recyclability. Most multilayer films are not sorted and recycled with the currently available infrastructure, which is based on mechanical recycling in most countries. Up to now, multilayer flexible food packaging was highly customizable. Diverse polymers and non-polymeric layers allowed a long product shelf-life and an optimized material efficiency. The need for more recyclable solutions asks for a reduction in the choice of material. Prospectively, there is a strong tendency that multilayer flexible barrier packaging should be based on polyolefins and a few recyclable barrier layers, such as aluminium oxide (AlOx) and silicon oxide (SiOx). The use of ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) and metallization could be more restricted in the future, as popular Design for Recycling Guidelines have recently reduced the maximum tolerable content of barrier materials in polyolefin packaging. The substitution of non-recyclable flexible barrier packaging is challenging because only a limited number of barriers are available. In the worst case, the restriction on material choice could result in a higher environmental burden through a shortened food shelf-life and increased packaging weights.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34828983
pii: foods10112702
doi: 10.3390/foods10112702
pmc: PMC8624454
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Vienna Business Agency
ID : 2658497
Références
Waste Manag. 2009 Oct;29(10):2625-43
pubmed: 19577459
Carbohydr Polym. 2013 Feb 15;92(2):2128-34
pubmed: 23399267
Waste Manag. 2018 Feb;72:55-64
pubmed: 29196054
Science. 2017 Nov 17;358(6365):870-872
pubmed: 29146798
Waste Manag. 2017 Nov;69:24-58
pubmed: 28823699
Waste Manag. 2018 Jun;76:180-189
pubmed: 29599024
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 10;738:139846
pubmed: 32535282
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 24;114(4):612-616
pubmed: 28119494
Waste Manag Res. 2013 Jun;31(6):539-40
pubmed: 23704038
Waste Manag. 2018 Jan;71:52-61
pubmed: 29097129
Waste Manag Res. 2017 Aug;35(8):793-794
pubmed: 28777062
Waste Manag Res. 2014 Sep;32(9 Suppl):3-18
pubmed: 25027765
Waste Manag. 2019 Jul 15;95:388-398
pubmed: 31351625
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 27;364(1526):2115-26
pubmed: 19528059
Waste Manag. 2018 Jul;77:413-425
pubmed: 29691112
Microb Biotechnol. 2019 Jan;12(1):66-68
pubmed: 30411497