Predictive Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking after Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Comparison with Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography.
acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking
low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography
myocardial deformation
speckle-tracking echocardiography
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Nov 2021
12 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
10
10
2021
revised:
04
11
2021
accepted:
09
11
2021
entrez:
27
11
2021
pubmed:
28
11
2021
medline:
28
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) may underestimate segmental functional recovery. We evaluated the predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking (FT) for functional recovery and whether it incremented the value of LGE compared to low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDSE) and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). Eighty patients underwent LDDSE and CMR within 5-7 days after STEMI and segmental functional recovery was defined as improvement in wall-motion at 6-months CMR. Optimal conventional and FT parameters were analyzed and then also applied to an external validation cohort of 222 STEMI patients. Circumferential strain (CS) was the strongest CMR-FT predictor and addition to LGE increased the overall accuracy to 74% and was especially relevant in segments with 50-74% LGE (AUC 0.60 vs. 0.75,
Identifiants
pubmed: 34830543
pii: jcm10225261
doi: 10.3390/jcm10225261
pmc: PMC8624532
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Aug 1;19(1):57
pubmed: 28764773
CMAJ. 2013 Aug 6;185(11):E537-44
pubmed: 23798453
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 May 01;15:35
pubmed: 23634753
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jan 18;15:8
pubmed: 23331550
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan;11(1):15-24
pubmed: 28528147
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008 Jul;9(4):415-37
pubmed: 18579481
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):600-608
pubmed: 31350585
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Feb;11(2 Pt 1):196-205
pubmed: 28528164
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 May 30;17:43
pubmed: 26024662
Circulation. 2021 Jan 19;143(3):209-211
pubmed: 33464965
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 20;177(3):935-41
pubmed: 25449504
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Mar;112:121-129
pubmed: 30777200
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Oct;28(10):1171-1181, e2
pubmed: 26209911
Circulation. 2004 May 11;109(18):2172-4
pubmed: 15117834
Eur J Radiol. 2015 May;84(5):840-8
pubmed: 25743248
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003;5(4):563-74
pubmed: 14664134
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Dec;10(8):iii3-7
pubmed: 19889656
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15;249:467-472
pubmed: 29121751
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jun 11;29:100560
pubmed: 32566723
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):307-15
pubmed: 25246506
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1419-1429
pubmed: 29361479
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619
pubmed: 22922416
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 15;157:15-21
pubmed: 34366114
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1433-1444
pubmed: 29454776
Am Heart J. 2007 Sep;154(3):415-23
pubmed: 17719283
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1448-1457
pubmed: 29248649
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Feb;29(2):254-60
pubmed: 9014975
Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6846-6857
pubmed: 31297633
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 15;151:1-9
pubmed: 34034906
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jun 16;43(12):2253-9
pubmed: 15193689
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;12(12):2445-2456
pubmed: 31202752
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Mar 10;17:25
pubmed: 25890093
J Nucl Cardiol. 2011 Dec;18(6):1095-102
pubmed: 21882082
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 3;42(5):895-901
pubmed: 12957439